| Literature DB >> 25933197 |
Haiyan Tong1, Ana G Rappold, Melissa Caughey, Alan L Hinderliter, Maryann Bassett, Tracey Montilla, Martin W Case, Jon Berntsen, Philip A Bromberg, Wayne E Cascio, David Diaz-Sanchez, Robert B Devlin, James M Samet.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Exposure to ambient particulate matter (PM) induces endothelial dysfunction, a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Olive oil (OO) and fish oil (FO) supplements have beneficial effects on endothelial function.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25933197 PMCID: PMC4629741 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1408988
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Perspect ISSN: 0091-6765 Impact factor: 9.031
Characteristics of the participants before dietary restriction and supplementation.
| Characteristic | Olive oil ( | Fish oil ( | Naive ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (male/female; | 4/9 | 4/12 | 2/11 |
| Age (years) | 59.3 ± 1.1 | 57.4 ± 1.4 | 57.8 ± 1.3 |
| Postmenopausal ( | 8 | 11 | 10 |
| Race (white/black; | 11/2 | 10/6 | 10/3 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.3 ± 1.3 | 27.6 ± 1.1 | 24.9 ± 1.2 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 123 ± 3 | 122 ± 3 | 121 ± 2 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 77 ± 2 | 77 ± 2 | 76 ± 3 |
| Heart rate (bpm) | 71 ± 3 | 74 ± 2 | 66 ± 3 |
| Cholesterol | |||
| Total (mg/dL) | 214 ± 7 | 201 ± 12 | 210 ± 10 |
| LDL (mg/dL) | 125 ± 9 | 117 ± 10 | 120 ± 9 |
| VLDL (mg/dL) | 19 ± 3 | 19 ± 2 | 18 ± 2 |
| HDL (mg/dL) | 70 ± 6 | 64 ± 4 | 71 ± 6 |
| Triglyceride (mg/dL) | 94 ± 14 | 97 ± 10 | 93 ± 8 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 93 ± 2 | 88 ± 3 | 92 ± 2 |
| WBC (× 103/μL) | 5.46 ± 0.39 | 5.53 ± 0.25 | 5.21 ± 0.36 |
| RBC (× 106/μL) | 4.76 ± 0.17 | 4.45 ± 0.12 | 4.54 ± 0.07 |
| Platelets (× 103/μL) | 223.3 ± 12.2 | 245.9 ± 13.6 | 250.4 ± 13.6 |
| Neutrophils (%) | 55.3 ± 2.7 | 55.9 ± 2.9 | 50.5 ± 4.7 |
| Lymphocytes (%) | 34.6 ± 2.5 | 34.9 ± 2.9 | 29.8 ± 3.2 |
| Smoking history ( | |||
| Nonsmokers | 11 | 11 | 13 |
| Ex-smokers | 2 | 5 | 0 |
| Current smokers | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Medications ( | |||
| Statin | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| β-Adrenergic receptor blockers | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ACE inhibitors | 3 | 2 | 0 |
| Antidepressant | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| NSAIDs | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| HRT | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Data are mean ± SEM. Age, BMI, medication usage, blood pressure, blood cell counts, serum glucose, and lipids were not significantly different among the groups (ANOVA, | |||
Mean percent point difference per 100-μg/m3 increase in CAP concentration relative to baseline (before filtered-air exposure) measured immediately after (post) and 20 hr after (FU) CAP exposure in each group.
| End point | OO ( | FO ( | Naive ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Post-CAP | Follow-up | Post-CAP | Follow-up | Post-CAP | Follow-up | |
| BAU | ||||||
| FMD | –7.6 (–21.5, 6.3) | –5.4 (–25.8, 15.1) | –13.7 (–24.5, –2.9)* | –21.5 (–37.3, –5.6)* | –19.4 (–36.4, –2.3)* | –17.9 (–43.0, 7.2) |
| BAD | 0.2 (–0.5, 0.9) | –0.3 (–1.4, 0.8) | 0.2 (–0.3, 0.8) | –0.2 (–1.0, 0.7) | –0.4 (–1.3, 0.4) | 0.8 (–0.5, 2.2) |
| Blood markers | ||||||
| ET-1 | –4.7 (–14.8, 5.4) | –10.0 (–22.1, 2.1) | –0.4 (–7.8, 7.0) | 1.4 (–7.9, 10.8) | 8.3 (–3.7, 20.2) | 17.1 (2.2, 32.0)* |
| tPA | 11.6 (0.8, 22.2)* | 10.9 (0.1, 21.8)* | 2.2 (–6.4, 10.9) | 1.9 (–7.2, 11.1) | –0.50 (–12.8, 11.7) | 1.2 (–11.7, 14.0) |
| PAI-1 | 0.1 (–6.6, 6.8) | –4.4 (–15.5, 6.6) | –0.6 (–5.6, 4.4) | –2.3 (–10.9, 6.3) | 6.3 (–1.7, 14.4) | 6.2 (–7.4, 19.7) |
| D-dimer | –4.1 (–24.0, 15.8) | –11.6 (–22.6, –0.5)* | –1.9 (–16.5, 12.6) | 1.4 (–7.2, 10.0) | –16.9 (–40.4, 6.7) | –2.9 (–16.5, 10.6) |
| Plasminogen | –6.7 (–16.3, 2.9) | –5.3 (–14.3, 3.6) | –3.1 (–10.4, 4.2) | 1.2 (–5.7, 8.2) | –2.0 (–13.6, 9.6) | –3.7 (–14.6, 7.3) |
| vWF | 4.5 (–2.5, 11.7) | 0.4 (–20.7, 21.5) | 0.3 (–4.9, 5.5) | 7.0 (–9.4, 23.4) | –0.1 (–8.5, 8.3) | –0.6 (–26.5, 25.2) |
| Fibrinogen | 1.0 (–3.8, 5.8) | 0.4 (–4.0, 4.8) | 0.2 (–3.4, 3.8) | 2.7 (–0.7, 6.2) | 5.0 (–0.8, 10.8) | 2.3 (–3.1, 7.8) |
| CRP | 0.7 (–24.4, 25.9) | 3.7 (–14.4, 21.8) | –1.7 (–20.7, 17.2) | –5.0 (–19.1, 9.1) | –2.5 (–32.8, 27.7) | 9.5 (–12.7, 31.7) |
| ICAM-1 | 0.8 (–29.1, 30.7) | –0.5 (–17.4, 16.3) | –1.8 (–24.3, 20.6) | –1.7 (–14.8, 11.3) | 0.3 (–35.6, 36.3) | 7.3 (–13.3, 27.9) |
| VCAM-1 | 0.1 (–28.4, 28.7) | –0.7 (–20.0, 18.6) | –2.4 (–23.9, 19.0) | –3.2 (–18.2, 11.8) | 2.1 (–32.1, 36.5) | 5.5 (–18.1, 29.2) |
| IL-6 | –1.4 (–12.3, 9.3) | –1.0 (–12.3, 10.2) | –3.9 (–12.2, 4.3) | –1.7 (–10.5, 7.0) | –4.7 (–17.7, 8.4) | –9.2 (–23.0, 4.6) |
| IL-8 | –1.1 (–5.7, 3.4) | 1.2 (–4.0, 6.5) | –0.1 (–3.6, 3.4) | 0.3 (–3.8, 4.4) | 3.7 (–1.8, 9.2) | –3.3 (–9.8, 3.1) |
| TNFα | 1.8 (–1.5, 5.2) | 0.2 (–3.5, 4.0) | –0.04 (–2.6, 2.5) | 0.6 (–2.3, 3.5) | –0.3 (–4.3, 3.7) | –3.9 (–8.6, 0.6) |
| End points are summarized as mean and 95% confidence interval. Abbreviations: BAD, baseline diameter of brachial artery; BAU, brachial artery ultrasound; CAP, concentrated ambient air pollution particles; CRP, c-reactive protein; ET-1, endothelin-1; FMD, flow-mediated dilation; FO, fish oil group; ICAM-1, intercellular adhesion molecule 1; Il, interleukin; OO, olive oil group; PAI-1, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1; TNFα, tumor necrosis factor α; tPA, tissue-type plasminogen activator; VCAM-1, vascular cell adhesion protein 1; vWF, von Willebrand factor. * | ||||||
Figure 1Effect of concentrated ambient particle (CAP) exposure on parameters of brachial artery ultrasound. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD; A) and baseline diameter (BAD; B) of the brachial artery were measured by ultrasound before, immediately after exposure to filtered-air and CAP (post), and again the next morning (follow-up) as described in “Methods.” Symbols represent differences between CAP and filtered-air exposure, expressed as average percent point differences per 100-μg/m3 increase in CAP, relative to the baseline; bars indicate 95% CIs.
Figure 2Effect of concentrated ambient particle (CAP) exposure on plasma markers of fibrinolysis. Blood was collected before and immediately after exposure (post) to filtered air and CAP, and again the next morning (follow-up), and markers of fibrinolysis, tPA (A) and D-dimer (B), were assayed by ELISA as described in “Methods.” Symbols represent differences between CAP and filtered-air exposure, expressed as average percent point differences per 100-μg/m3 increase in CAP, relative to the baseline; bars indicate 95% CIs.
Figure 3Effect of concentrated ambient particle (CAP) exposure on plasma endothelin-1 levels. Blood was collected before and immediately after exposure (post) to filtered air and CAP, and again the next morning (follow-up) and assayed for endothelin-1 by ELISA as described in “Methods.” Symbols represent differences between CAP and filtered-air exposure, expressed as average percent point differences per 100-μg/m3 increase in CAP, relative to the baseline; bars indicate 95% CIs.