Maka Tsulukidze1, Stuart W Grande1, Rachel Thompson2, Kenneth Rudd1, Glyn Elwyn3. 1. The Dartmouth Center for Health Care Delivery Science, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States of America. 2. The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States of America. 3. The Dartmouth Center for Health Care Delivery Science, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States of America; The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States of America; The Scientific Institute for Quality Improvement, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The phenomenon of patients covertly recording clinical encounters has generated controversial media reports. This study aims to examine the phenomenon and analyze the underlying issues. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a qualitative analysis of online posts, articles, blogs, and forums (texts) discussing patients covertly recording clinical encounters. Using Google and Google Blog search engines, we identified and analyzed 62 eligible texts published in multiple countries between 2006 and 2013. Thematic analysis revealed four key themes: 1) a new behavior that elicits strong reactions, both positive and negative, 2) an erosion of trust, 3) shifting patient-clinician roles and relationships, and 4) the existence of confused and conflicting responses. When patients covertly record clinical encounters - a behavior made possible by various digital recording technologies - strong reactions are evoked among a range of stakeholders. The behavior represents one consequence of an erosion of trust between patients and clinicians, and when discovered, leads to further deterioration of trust. Confused and conflicting responses to the phenomenon by patients and clinicians highlight the need for policy guidance. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes strong reactions, both positive and negative, to the phenomenon of patients covertly recording clinical encounters. The availability of smartphones capable of digital recording, and shifting attitudes to patient-clinician relationships, seems to have led to this behavior, mostly viewed as a threat by clinicians but as a welcome and helpful innovation by some patients, possibly indicating a perception of subordination and a lack of empowerment. Further examination of this tension and its implications is needed.
BACKGROUND: The phenomenon of patients covertly recording clinical encounters has generated controversial media reports. This study aims to examine the phenomenon and analyze the underlying issues. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a qualitative analysis of online posts, articles, blogs, and forums (texts) discussing patients covertly recording clinical encounters. Using Google and Google Blog search engines, we identified and analyzed 62 eligible texts published in multiple countries between 2006 and 2013. Thematic analysis revealed four key themes: 1) a new behavior that elicits strong reactions, both positive and negative, 2) an erosion of trust, 3) shifting patient-clinician roles and relationships, and 4) the existence of confused and conflicting responses. When patients covertly record clinical encounters - a behavior made possible by various digital recording technologies - strong reactions are evoked among a range of stakeholders. The behavior represents one consequence of an erosion of trust between patients and clinicians, and when discovered, leads to further deterioration of trust. Confused and conflicting responses to the phenomenon by patients and clinicians highlight the need for policy guidance. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes strong reactions, both positive and negative, to the phenomenon of patients covertly recording clinical encounters. The availability of smartphones capable of digital recording, and shifting attitudes to patient-clinician relationships, seems to have led to this behavior, mostly viewed as a threat by clinicians but as a welcome and helpful innovation by some patients, possibly indicating a perception of subordination and a lack of empowerment. Further examination of this tension and its implications is needed.
Authors: Tom Delbanco; Jan Walker; Jonathan D Darer; Joann G Elmore; Henry J Feldman; Suzanne G Leveille; James D Ralston; Stephen E Ross; Elisabeth Vodicka; Valerie D Weber Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2010-07-20 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Paul J Barr; Michelle D Dannenberg; Craig H Ganoe; William Haslett; Rebecca Faill; Saeed Hassanpour; Amar Das; Roger Arend; Meredith C Masel; Sheryl Piper; Haley Reicher; James Ryan; Glyn Elwyn Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2017-07-06
Authors: Stuart W Grande; Mary Ganger Castaldo; Elizabeth Carpenter-Song; Ida Griesemer; Glyn Elwyn Journal: Health Expect Date: 2016-09-07 Impact factor: 3.377