James F Holmes1, Joshua Freilich, Sandra L Taylor, David Buettner. 1. James F. Holmes, MD, MPH, is Professor; and Joshua Freilich, RN, MSN, MHA, is Assistant Nurse Manager, Department of Emergency Medicine, UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California. Sandra L. Taylor, PhD, is Senior Statistician, Clinical Translational Science Center, UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California. David Buettner, RN, MS, is Emergency Department Clinical Resource Nurse and Clinical Information System Analyst, Department of Emergency Medicine, UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Alerts embedded in electronic health records (EHRs) are designed to improve processes at the point of care. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine if an EHR alert-at emergency department (ED) triage-increases the ED triage nurse's utilization of triage protocols. METHODS:ED triage nurses were randomized to receive either a passive EHR alert or no intervention for patients with the following complaints: minor trauma with extremity injuries or female patients with abdominal pain. The EHR alert notified the nurse that the patient was eligible for diagnostic testing: radiographs for patients with injured extremities or urinalysis for female patients with abdominal pain. RESULTS: Twenty-eight nurses triaged 20,410 patients in the 6 months before the intervention and 19,157 in the 6 months after the intervention. Before the intervention, the urinalysis protocol was implemented in 101/624 (16.2%) patients triaged by the intervention group and 116/711 (16.3%) triaged by the control group. After the intervention, the urinalysis protocol was implemented in 146/530 (27.6%) patients triaged by the intervention group and 174/679 (25.6%) triaged by the control group. Before the intervention, the radiograph protocol was implemented in 58/774 (7.5%) patients triaged by the intervention group and 45/684 (6.6%) triaged by the control group. After the intervention, the radiograph protocol was implemented in 78/614 (12.7%) patients triaged by the intervention group and 79/609 (13.0%) triaged by the control group. CONCLUSION: The use of a passive EHR alert to promote ED triage protocols showed little benefit. Before the widespread implementation of EHR alerts for patient care, rigorous studies are required to determine the best alert methods and the impacts of such interventions.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Alerts embedded in electronic health records (EHRs) are designed to improve processes at the point of care. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine if an EHR alert-at emergency department (ED) triage-increases the ED triage nurse's utilization of triage protocols. METHODS: ED triage nurses were randomized to receive either a passive EHR alert or no intervention for patients with the following complaints: minor trauma with extremity injuries or female patients with abdominal pain. The EHR alert notified the nurse that the patient was eligible for diagnostic testing: radiographs for patients with injured extremities or urinalysis for female patients with abdominal pain. RESULTS: Twenty-eight nurses triaged 20,410 patients in the 6 months before the intervention and 19,157 in the 6 months after the intervention. Before the intervention, the urinalysis protocol was implemented in 101/624 (16.2%) patients triaged by the intervention group and 116/711 (16.3%) triaged by the control group. After the intervention, the urinalysis protocol was implemented in 146/530 (27.6%) patients triaged by the intervention group and 174/679 (25.6%) triaged by the control group. Before the intervention, the radiograph protocol was implemented in 58/774 (7.5%) patients triaged by the intervention group and 45/684 (6.6%) triaged by the control group. After the intervention, the radiograph protocol was implemented in 78/614 (12.7%) patients triaged by the intervention group and 79/609 (13.0%) triaged by the control group. CONCLUSION: The use of a passive EHR alert to promote ED triage protocols showed little benefit. Before the widespread implementation of EHR alerts for patient care, rigorous studies are required to determine the best alert methods and the impacts of such interventions.
Authors: Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Thomas R Fulda; Patricia J Byrns; Susan C Winckler; Michael T Rupp; Michelle A Chui Journal: J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash) Date: 2002 May-Jun
Authors: R Lecumberri; E Panizo; A Gomez-Guiu; S Varea; E García-Quetglas; M Serrano; A García-Mouriz; M Marqués; A Gómez-Outes; J A Páramo Journal: J Thromb Haemost Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 5.824
Authors: Gregory A Coté; John P Rice; William Bulsiewicz; John P Norvell; Keri Christensen; Anne Bobb; Michael Postelnick; Colin W Howden Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Kaveh G Shojania; Alison Jennings; Alain Mayhew; Craig R Ramsay; Martin P Eccles; Jeremy Grimshaw Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2009-07-08
Authors: Mika Lehto; Kaisu Pitkälä; Ossi Rahkonen; Merja K Laine; Marko Raina; Timo Kauppila Journal: Scand J Prim Health Care Date: 2021-04-14 Impact factor: 2.581