Literature DB >> 25932609

Preoperative identification of neurosurgery patients with a high risk of in-hospital complications: a prospective cohort of 418 consecutive elective craniotomy patients.

Elina Reponen1, Miikka Korja2,3, Tomi Niemi1, Marja Silvasti-Lundell1, Juha Hernesniemi2, Hanna Tuominen1.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Patients undergoing craniotomy are routinely assessed preoperatively, yet the role of these assessments in predicting outcome is poorly studied. This study aimed to identify preoperative factors predicting in-hospital outcome after cranial neurosurgery.
METHODS: The study cohort consisted of 418 consecutive adults undergoing elective craniotomy for any intracranial lesion. Apart from the age criteria (≥ 18 years), almost all patients were considered eligible for the study to increase external validity of the results. The studied preoperative assessments included various patient-related data, routine blood tests, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification system, and a local modification of the ASA classification (Helsinki ASA classification). Adverse outcomes were in-hospital mortality, in-hospital systemic or infectious complications, and in-hospital CNS deficits. Resource use was defined as length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit and overall LOS in the hospital.
RESULTS: The in-hospital mortality rate was 1.0%. In-hospital systemic or infectious complications and permanent or transient CNS deficits occurred in 6.7% and 11.2% of the patients, respectively. Advanced age (≥ 60-65 years), elevated C-reactive protein level (> 3 mg/L), and high Helsinki ASA score (Class 4) were associated with in-hospital systemic and infectious complications, and a combination of these could identify one-fourth of the patients with postoperative complications. Moreover, this combination of preoperative assessment parameters was significantly associated with increased resource use.
CONCLUSIONS: In this first prospective and unselected cohort study of outcome after elective craniotomy, simple preoperative assessments identified patients with a high risk of in-hospital systemic or infectious complications as well as extended resource use. Presented risk assessment methods may be widely applicable, also in low-volume centers, as they are based on composite predictors and outcome events.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ASA = American Society of Anesthesiologists; BMI = body mass index; CRP = C-reactive protein; ICU = intensive care unit; LOS = length of stay; PT = prothrombin time; craniotomy; elective; outcome; preoperative assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25932609     DOI: 10.3171/2014.11.JNS141970

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  8 in total

1.  The Utility of Routine Intensive Care Admission for Patients Undergoing Intracranial Neurosurgical Procedures: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cesar Cimonari de Almeida; M Dustin Boone; Yosef Laviv; Burkhard S Kasper; Clark C Chen; Ekkehard M Kasper
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.210

2.  The modified frailty index and 30-day adverse events in oncologic neurosurgery.

Authors:  Brett E Youngerman; Alfred I Neugut; Jingyan Yang; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright; Jeffrey N Bruce
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Factors associated with prolonged length of stay for elective hepatobiliary and neurosurgery patients: a retrospective medical record review.

Authors:  Siu Yin Lee; Soo-Hoon Lee; Jenny H H Tan; Howard S L Foo; Phillip H Phan; Alfred W C Kow; Sein Lwin; Penelope M Y Seah; Siti Zubaidah Mordiffi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Middle meningeal artery embolization to treat progressive epidural hematoma: a case report.

Authors:  Tae Joon Park; Sang Pyung Lee; Jinwook Baek; Kyoungsoo Ryou; Seong Hwan Kim
Journal:  J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg       Date:  2020-03-31

5.  Surgery on giant meningiomas in very old patients entails frequent postoperative intracranial hemorrhages and atypical histopathology.

Authors:  Roel H L Haeren; Ilari Rautalin; Christoph Schwartz; Miikka Korja; Mika Niemelä
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Mortality of surgically treated 80-year-old or older intracranial meningioma patients in comparison to matched general population.

Authors:  Ilari Rautalin; Christoph Schwartz; Mika Niemelä; Miikka Korja
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Does general comorbidity impact the postoperative outcomes after surgery for large and giant petroclival meningiomas?

Authors:  Alexandre Roux; Lucas Troude; Guillaume Baucher; Florian Bernard; Johan Pallud; Pierre-Hugues Roche
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 2.800

8.  Is surgery justified for 80-year-old or older intracranial meningioma patients? A systematic review.

Authors:  Ilari Rautalin; Mika Niemelä; Miikka Korja
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-04-04       Impact factor: 3.042

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.