Literature DB >> 25932601

Determination of the biomechanical effect of an interspinous process device on implanted and adjacent lumbar spinal segments using a hybrid testing protocol: a finite-element study.

Deniz U Erbulut1,2, Iman Zafarparandeh1, Chaudhry R Hassan1, Ismail Lazoglu1, Ali F Ozer2.   

Abstract

OBJECT The authors evaluated the biomechanical effects of an interspinous process (ISP) device on kinematics and load sharing at the implanted and adjacent segments. METHODS A 3D finite-element (FE) model of the lumbar spine (L1-5) was developed and validated through comparison with published in vitro study data. Specifically, validation was achieved by a flexible (load-control) approach in 3 main planes under a pure moment of 10 Nm and a compressive follower load of 400 N. The ISP device was inserted between the L-3 and L-4 processes. Intact and implanted cases were simulated using the hybrid protocol in all motion directions. The resultant motion, facet load, and intradiscal pressure after implantation were investigated at the index and adjacent levels. In addition, stress at the bone-implant interface was predicted. RESULTS The hybrid approach, shown to be appropriate for adjacent-level investigations, predicted that the ISP device would decrease the range of motion, facet load, and intradiscal pressure at the index level relative to the corresponding values for the intact spine in extension. Specifically, the intradiscal pressure induced after implantation at adjacent segments increased by 39.7% and by 6.6% at L2-3 and L4-5, respectively. Similarly, facet loads at adjacent segments after implantation increased up to 60% relative to the loads in the intact case. Further, the stress at the bone-implant interface increased significantly. The influence of the ISP device on load sharing parameters in motion directions other than extension was negligible. CONCLUSIONS Although ISP devices apply a distraction force on the processes and prevent further extension of the index segment, their implantation may cause changes in biomechanical parameters such as facet load, intradiscal pressure, and range of motion at adjacent levels in extension.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ALE = adjacent-level effect; FE = finite element; FN = flying node; IDP = intradiscal pressure; ISL = interspinous ligament; ISP = interspinous process; ROM = range of motion; SSL = supraspinous ligament; interspinous device; lumbar spine; posterior stabilization

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25932601     DOI: 10.3171/2014.12.SPINE14419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  9 in total

1.  Biomechanical analysis of a new lumbar interspinous device with optimized topology.

Authors:  Chen-Sheng Chen; Shih-Liang Shih
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Biomechanical Comparison of Spinal Fusion Methods Using Interspinous Process Compressor and Pedicle Screw Fixation System Based on Finite Element Method.

Authors:  Jisoo Choi; Sohee Kim; Dong-Ah Shin
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2016-02-29

3.  Finite element simulation and clinical follow-up of lumbar spine biomechanics with dynamic fixations.

Authors:  Yolanda Más; Luis Gracia; Elena Ibarz; Sergio Gabarre; Diego Peña; Antonio Herrera
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Biomechanical comparison of noncontiguous cervical disc arthroplasty and noncontiguous cervical discectomy and fusion in the treatment of noncontinuous cervical degenerative disc disease: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Xiangyao Sun; Siyuan Sun; Tongtong Zhang; Chao Kong; Wei Wang; Shibao Lu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Automated Pipeline to Generate Anatomically Accurate Patient-Specific Biomechanical Models of Healthy and Pathological FSUs.

Authors:  Sebastiano Caprara; Fabio Carrillo; Jess G Snedeker; Mazda Farshad; Marco Senteler
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-01-28

6.  Biomechanical effects of osteoporosis on adjacent segments after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: A finite element study.

Authors:  Chenchen Zhang; Minmin Chang; Renwen Zhang; Shujie Tang
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.088

7.  Influence of posterior pedicle screw fixation at L4-L5 level on biomechanics of the lumbar spine with and without fusion: a finite element method.

Authors:  Emre Sengul; Ramazan Ozmen; Mesut Emre Yaman; Teyfik Demir
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  The application of finite element analysis to determine the optimal UIV of growing-rod treatment in early-onset scoliosis.

Authors:  Aixing Pan; Hongtao Ding; Junjie Wang; Zhuo Zhang; Hongbo Zhang; Yuzeng Liu; Yong Hai
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-02

9.  Lumbar Single-Level Dynamic Stabilization with Semi-Rigid and Full Dynamic Systems: A Retrospective Clinical and Radiological Analysis of 71 Patients.

Authors:  Ali Fahir Ozer; Tunc Oktenoglu; Emrah Egemen; Mehdi Sasani; Atilla Yilmaz; Deniz Ufuk Erbulut; Onur Yaman; Tuncer Suzer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2017-08-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.