Pravin U Dugel1, Roger L Novack, Karl G Csaky, Preston P Richmond, David G Birch, Ryo Kubota. 1. *Retinal Consultants of Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona; †Retina-Vitreous Associates Medical Group, Beverly Hills, California; ‡Texas Retina Associates, Dallas, Texas; §Central Florida Retina, Orlando, Florida; ¶Retina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, Texas; and **Acucela Inc, Seattle, Washington.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study assessed the safety, tolerability, and pharmacodynamics of emixustat hydrochloride (ACU-4429), a novel visual cycle modulator, in subjects with geographic atrophy associated with dry age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: Subjects were randomly assigned to oral emixustat (2, 5, 7, or 10 mg once daily) or placebo (3:1 ratio) for 90 days. Recovery of rod photoreceptor sensitivity after a photobleach was measured by electroretinography. Safety evaluations included analysis of adverse events and ophthalmic examinations. RESULTS:Seventy-two subjects (54 emixustat and 18placebo) were evaluated. Emixustat suppressed rod photoreceptor sensitivity in a dose-dependent manner. Suppression plateaued by Day 14 and was reversible within 7 days to 14 days after drug cessation. Most systemic adverse events were not considered treatment related. Dose-related ocular adverse events (chromatopsia, 57% emixustat vs. 17% placebo and delayed dark adaptation, 48% emixustat vs. 6% placebo) were mild to moderate in severity, and the majority resolved on study or within 7 days to 14 days after study drug cessation. Reversibility of these adverse events with long-term administration, however, is undetermined. CONCLUSION: In this Phase II study, emixustat produced a dose-dependent reversible effect on rod function that is consistent with the proposed mechanism of action. These results support further testing of emixustat for the treatment of geographic atrophy associated with dry age-related macular degeneration.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: This study assessed the safety, tolerability, and pharmacodynamics of emixustat hydrochloride (ACU-4429), a novel visual cycle modulator, in subjects with geographic atrophy associated with dry age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: Subjects were randomly assigned to oral emixustat (2, 5, 7, or 10 mg once daily) or placebo (3:1 ratio) for 90 days. Recovery of rod photoreceptor sensitivity after a photobleach was measured by electroretinography. Safety evaluations included analysis of adverse events and ophthalmic examinations. RESULTS: Seventy-two subjects (54 emixustat and 18 placebo) were evaluated. Emixustat suppressed rod photoreceptor sensitivity in a dose-dependent manner. Suppression plateaued by Day 14 and was reversible within 7 days to 14 days after drug cessation. Most systemic adverse events were not considered treatment related. Dose-related ocular adverse events (chromatopsia, 57% emixustat vs. 17% placebo and delayed dark adaptation, 48% emixustat vs. 6% placebo) were mild to moderate in severity, and the majority resolved on study or within 7 days to 14 days after study drug cessation. Reversibility of these adverse events with long-term administration, however, is undetermined. CONCLUSION: In this Phase II study, emixustat produced a dose-dependent reversible effect on rod function that is consistent with the proposed mechanism of action. These results support further testing of emixustat for the treatment of geographic atrophy associated with dry age-related macular degeneration.
Authors: Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg; Almut Bindewald-Wittich; Joanna Dolar-Szczasny; Jens Dreyhaupt; Sebastian Wolf; Hendrik P N Scholl; Frank G Holz Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: M Suter; C Remé; C Grimm; A Wenzel; M Jäättela; P Esser; N Kociok; M Leist; C Richter Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2000-12-15 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Da Sun; Rebecca M Schur; Avery E Sears; Song-Qi Gao; Wenyu Sun; Amirreza Naderi; Timothy Kern; Krzysztof Palczewski; Zheng-Rong Lu Journal: ACS Appl Bio Mater Date: 2020-04-03
Authors: Rajalekshmy Shyam; Aruna Gorusupudi; Kelly Nelson; Martin P Horvath; Paul S Bernstein Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-09-05 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Artur V Cideciyan; Malgorzata Swider; Sharon B Schwartz; Edwin M Stone; Samuel G Jacobson Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Eliav Blum; Jianye Zhang; Jordan Zaluski; David E Einstein; Edward E Korshin; Adam Kubas; Arie Gruzman; Gregory P Tochtrop; Philip D Kiser; Krzysztof Palczewski Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2021-06-03 Impact factor: 8.039