Min Zhang1, Xiaojie Zhang2, Cangshang Zheng3. 1. Department of Stomatology, The Second People's Hospital of Shenzhen Shenzhen 518035, China ; The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University Shenzhen, China. 2. Department of Stomatology, The Second People's Hospital of Shenzhen Shenzhen 518035, China. 3. Department of Stomatology, The Second People's Hospital of Shenzhen Shenzhen 518035, China ; Shenzhen University School of Medicine Shenzhen 518040, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To observe the impact on maxillary growth of the use of buccal fat pads to pack palate relaxing incisions. METHODS: We recruited 30 patients aged 3-4 years with a complete cleft palate. Half (15) of the patients underwent reparative surgery that entailed packing buccal fat pads into the bilateral raw bony surfaces and served as the experimental group. The remaining 15 patients underwent reparative surgery that entailed packing and fixing relaxing incisions with iodoform gauze and served as the control group. After a 5-year follow-up, the differences in data from X-ray cephalometry and upper dental models in the two groups were analyzed using the T test. RESULTS: A significant difference (P < 0.05) in maxillary growth was observed between the two groups of children with cleft palate. CONCLUSION: The results supported the use of buccal fat pads to pack relaxing incisions which led to improved maxillary development in patients with cleft palate.
OBJECTIVE: To observe the impact on maxillary growth of the use of buccal fat pads to pack palate relaxing incisions. METHODS: We recruited 30 patients aged 3-4 years with a complete cleft palate. Half (15) of the patients underwent reparative surgery that entailed packing buccal fat pads into the bilateral raw bony surfaces and served as the experimental group. The remaining 15 patients underwent reparative surgery that entailed packing and fixing relaxing incisions with iodoform gauze and served as the control group. After a 5-year follow-up, the differences in data from X-ray cephalometry and upper dental models in the two groups were analyzed using the T test. RESULTS: A significant difference (P < 0.05) in maxillary growth was observed between the two groups of children with cleft palate. CONCLUSION: The results supported the use of buccal fat pads to pack relaxing incisions which led to improved maxillary development in patients with cleft palate.
Authors: Katelyn J Kotlarek; Michael S Jaskolka; Xiangming Fang; Charles Ellis; Silvia S Blemker; Bruce Horswell; Paul Kloostra; Jamie L Perry Journal: Cleft Palate Craniofac J Date: 2021-05-11