Literature DB >> 25932151

Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements and Gd-DTPA enhanced-imaging in staging hepatic fibrosis in rats.

Yi-Ping Zhao1, Dong-Mei Guo1, Hui Liu2, Wen-Hong Liu3, Wen-Ying Mu1, Peng Zhang1.   

Abstract

To evaluate the utility of ADC values and Gd-DTPA equilibrium phase MR imaging in staging hepatic fibrosis in rats. 48 rats were allocated into experimental and control groups. Experimental rats were subcutaneously injected with a mixture of CCl4. From 4th-12th weeks, MR images were obtained, which include pre-enhanced phase imaging, DWI and equilibrium phase imaging. Then the rat groups were subdivided according to the stages of fibrosis (S0, S1, S2, S3 and S4) after histopathological analysis. The original MRI data were forwarded to the workstation to obtain apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps at b value of 500 s/mm(2). Pre-enhanced phase and equilibrium phase signal intensities and relative contrast enhancement index (RCEI) were measured as well. Lastly, the ADC values and RCEI of the experimental group were compared with each other and with the control group. All statistical analyses were carried out with SPSS, where P < 0.05 is considered to represent a significant difference. Hepatic ADC values are significantly different between the experimental and control groups (P = 0). There is a statistically significant difference between the experimental and control groups on RCEI (P = 0). Comparing the S1, S2, S3 and S4 groups, there is a statistically significant difference between the mild group (S1 and S2) and the severe group (S4) in terms of ADC values and RCEI (all P < 0.05). A statistically significant difference is also found between the moderate group (S3) and the severe group in ADC values. As the degree of fibrosis increases, there are a reduction in ADC values and an increase in RCEI. Comparing the groups with ADC values and enhancement index, there are statistically significant differences in sensitivity and specificity on diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis. The ADC values have the best sensitivity (93.1%) and specificity (83.3%). Quantitative ADC values and RCEI may be helpful to the staging of rat fibrosis, but their application in human is controversial.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hepatic fibrosis staging; apparent diffusion coefficient; equilibrium phase imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; rat model

Year:  2015        PMID: 25932151      PMCID: PMC4402798     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med        ISSN: 1940-5901


  26 in total

1.  Utility of diffusion-weighted imaging in the evaluation of liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Ayse Ahsen Bakan; Ercan Inci; Selim Bakan; Suut Gokturk; Tan Cimilli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Influence of perfusion on hepatic MR diffusion measurement.

Authors:  K G Hollingsworth; D J Lomas
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  Magnetic resonance-based total liver volume and magnetic resonance-diffusion weighted imaging for staging liver fibrosis in mini-pigs.

Authors:  Hang Li; Tian-Wu Chen; Xiao-Li Chen; Xiao-Ming Zhang; Zhen-Lin Li; Nan-Lin Zeng; Li Zhou; Li-Ying Wang; Hong-Jie Tang; Chun-Ping Li; Li Li; Xian-Yong Xie
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Assessment of chronic hepatitis and fibrosis: comparison of MR elastography and diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Daniel R Ganger; Josh Levitsky; Laura A Sternick; Robert J McCarthy; Zongming E Chen; Charles W Fasanati; Bradley Bolster; Saurabh Shah; Sven Zuehlsdorff; Reed A Omary; Richard L Ehman; Frank H Miller
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Can Doppler sonography grade the severity of hepatitis C-related liver disease?

Authors:  Adrian K P Lim; Nayna Patel; Robert J Eckersley; Yu-Ting Kuo; Robert D Goldin; Howard C Thomas; David O Cosgrove; Simon D Taylor-Robinson; Martin J K Blomley
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 6.  GI epidemiology: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  P Angulo
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 8.171

7.  Magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging in the diagnosis of diffuse liver diseases in rats.

Authors:  Sheng Guan; Kang-rong Zhou; Wei-dong Zhao; Wei-jun Peng; Feng Tang; Jian Mao
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 2.628

8.  Staging hepatic fibrosis: comparison of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging--preliminary observations.

Authors:  Haruo Watanabe; Masayuki Kanematsu; Satoshi Goshima; Hiroshi Kondo; Minoru Onozuka; Noriyuki Moriyama; Kyongtae T Bae
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  The value of liver and spleen ADC measurements in the diagnosis and follow up of hepatic fibrosis in chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Ö Tokgöz; I Unal; G Gedikli Turgut; S Yildiz
Journal:  Acta Clin Belg       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 1.264

10.  The hepatocyte phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI in the evaluation of hepatic fibrosis and early liver cirrhosis in a rat model: an experimental study.

Authors:  Chunmei Ma; Ailian Liu; Yuanyuan Wang; Xiaoling Geng; Li Hao; Qingwei Song; Bo Sun; Heqing Wang; Gang Zhao
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 5.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.