Literature DB >> 2593192

Comparison of blood gases during transport using two methods of ventilatory support.

J M Hurst1, K Davis, R D Branson, J A Johannigman.   

Abstract

Transportation of critically ill patients requiring ventilatory support represents a common, yet difficult, problem faced by clinicians. We examined 28 patients requiring transport in a prospective, randomized fashion, comparing manual ventilation with ventilation provided by a transport ventilator. Patients were ventilated to their destination with one method and returned with the alternate method. After manual ventilation, all patients showed a marked respiratory alkalosis (pH increased from 7.39 to 7.51 and PaCO2 decreased from 39 to 30 torr). After ventilation with the transport ventilator, no appreciable changes in pH or PaCO2 were seen. Oxygenation remained stable with both methods. No patient suffered hemodynamic instability, although two patients in the manual ventilation group developed cardiac arrhythmias. We conclude that when ventilatory support is required during transport, a transport ventilator produces reliable control of ventilation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2593192     DOI: 10.1097/00005373-198912000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  9 in total

1.  Ventilation patterns in patients with severe traumatic brain injury following paramedic rapid sequence intubation.

Authors:  Daniel P Davis; Robyn Heister; Jennifer C Poste; David B Hoyt; Mel Ochs; James V Dunford
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.210

2.  Predictors for deterioration of respiratory function.

Authors:  G Marx; H Rückoldt; M Jankowski; M Leuwer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Evaluation of the impact of implementing the emergency medical services traumatic brain injury guidelines in Arizona: the Excellence in Prehospital Injury Care (EPIC) study methodology.

Authors:  Daniel W Spaite; Bentley J Bobrow; Uwe Stolz; Duane Sherrill; Vatsal Chikani; Bruce Barnhart; Michael Sotelo; Joshua B Gaither; Chad Viscusi; P David Adelson; Kurt R Denninghoff
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 4.  Recommendations for the intra-hospital transport of critically ill patients.

Authors:  Benoît Fanara; Cyril Manzon; Olivier Barbot; Thibaut Desmettre; Gilles Capellier
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Smart Bag vs. Standard bag in the temporary substitution of the mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Robin Lovat; Christine Watremez; Michel Van Dyck; Olivier Van Caenegem; Franck Verschuren; Philippe Hantson; Luc-Marie Jacquet
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Deterioration of respiratory function after intra-hospital transport of critically ill surgical patients.

Authors:  C Waydhas; G Schneck; K H Duswald
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  [Intrahospital transport of critically ill patients].

Authors:  M Löw; U Jaschinski
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 8.  Invasive mechanical ventilation in the emergency department.

Authors:  Başak Bayram; Emre Şancı
Journal:  Turk J Emerg Med       Date:  2019-03-29

9.  Intra-hospital transport of critically ill patients with rapid response team and risk factors for cardiopulmonary arrest: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hyun Ju Min; Hyung-Jun Kim; Dong Seon Lee; Yun Young Choi; Miae Yoon; Dayoon Lee; Jun Yeun Cho; Jong Sun Park; Young-Jae Cho; Ho Il Yoon; Jae Ho Lee; Choon-Taek Lee; Yeon Joo Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.