OBJECTIVE: Helicobacter pylori (HP) is the world's most common infectious agent. Despite conventional therapy consisting of proton pump inhibitor (PPI), amoxicillin (AMO) and clarithromycin (CLA), approximately half of the patients remain infected. We compared the PPI-based triple therapy with quadruple treatment (BPMT) including bismuth citrate (BS), PPI, metronidazole (MET) and tetracycline (TET). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-three patients who used triple therapy (LAC) consisting of lansoprazole (L), AMO and CLA and 42 patients who used quadruple therapy (BPMT) for 14 days between May 2008 and November 2013 were included in the study. The LAC group included patients who received 30 mg L 2×1, 1000 mg AMO 2×1, and 500 mg CLA 2×1 for 14 days, whereas the BPMT group was designed from patients who received 600 mg BS 2×1, 40 mg omeprazole (O) 2×1 or 30 mg L 2×1, 500 mg MET 3×1 and 500 mg TET 4×1. RESULTS: Demographic characteristics and endoscopic findings were similar in both groups. The eradication rate was 53.4% in the LAC group and 78.5% in the BPMT group (p<0.05). Compliance problems and side effects were significantly higher in the BPMT group as compared to the LAC group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Due to high antibiotic resistance in Turkey, the efficacy of LAC treatment has reduced. The BPMT protocol should be kept in mind in the first line of treatment, since it provides a higher eradication rate.
OBJECTIVE:Helicobacter pylori (HP) is the world's most common infectious agent. Despite conventional therapy consisting of proton pump inhibitor (PPI), amoxicillin (AMO) and clarithromycin (CLA), approximately half of the patients remain infected. We compared the PPI-based triple therapy with quadruple treatment (BPMT) including bismuth citrate (BS), PPI, metronidazole (MET) and tetracycline (TET). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-three patients who used triple therapy (LAC) consisting of lansoprazole (L), AMO and CLA and 42 patients who used quadruple therapy (BPMT) for 14 days between May 2008 and November 2013 were included in the study. The LAC group included patients who received 30 mg L 2×1, 1000 mg AMO 2×1, and 500 mg CLA 2×1 for 14 days, whereas the BPMT group was designed from patients who received 600 mg BS 2×1, 40 mg omeprazole (O) 2×1 or 30 mg L 2×1, 500 mg MET 3×1 and 500 mg TET 4×1. RESULTS: Demographic characteristics and endoscopic findings were similar in both groups. The eradication rate was 53.4% in the LAC group and 78.5% in the BPMT group (p<0.05). Compliance problems and side effects were significantly higher in the BPMT group as compared to the LAC group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Due to high antibiotic resistance in Turkey, the efficacy of LAC treatment has reduced. The BPMT protocol should be kept in mind in the first line of treatment, since it provides a higher eradication rate.
Authors: W M Wong; Q Gu; S K Lam; F M Y Fung; K C Lai; W H C Hu; Y K Yee; C K Chan; H H X Xia; M F Yuen; B C Y Wong Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2003-02-15 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Wai Man Wong; Jiaqing Huang; Harry H X Xia; Fiona M Y Fung; Teresa S M Tong; Kess L Cheung; Vicky Y K Ho; Kam Chuen Lai; Chi Kuen Chan; Annie O O Chan; Chee-Kin Hui; Shiu Kum Lam; Benjamin C Y Wong Journal: J Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 4.029
Authors: Benjamin Chun-Yu Wong; Shiu Kum Lam; Wai Man Wong; Jian Shun Chen; Ting Ting Zheng; Rui E Feng; Kam Chuen Lai; Wayne Hsing Cheng Hu; Siu Tsan Yuen; Suet Yi Leung; Daniel Yee Tak Fong; Joanna Ho; Chi Kong Ching; Jun Shi Chen Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-01-14 Impact factor: 56.272