Literature DB >> 25931911

The growing role of laparoscopic repair in patients with early diagnosed peptic ulcer perforation.

Muhammet Ferhat Çelik1, Ahmet Cem Dural1, Cevher Akarsu1, Mustafa Gökhan Ünsal1, İlhan Gök1, Osman Köneş1, Murat Gönenç1, Halil Alış1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopy is gaining more importance in emergency abdominal surgery. Peptic ulcer perforation (PUP) constitutes a significant portion of surgical emergencies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the methods and results of patients who underwent surgery due to PUP in our department.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who were admitted to the hospital in the early period and received Graham-patch (GP) repair due to PUP from January 2009 to January 2013 were divided into two groups as laparoscopic (group L) or open (group O) surgery. Demographic data of the patients, duration of the operation, conversion to open surgery, length of hospital stay, secondary interventions, re-admissions, morbidity and mortality rates were retrospectively evaluated. Patients with conversion to open surgery were included in Group O.
RESULTS: Two hundred and nineteen patients were included in the study, 148 of which were in Group O (including the 47 patients with conversion), and 71 in group L. In patients with early admission, the rate of laparoscopically completed GP was 19.6% in the first year of the study, whereas this rate was 61.8% in the fourth year (p<0.001). The rate of conversion to open surgery was 50% in 2009, and 24.4% in 2012 (p=0.028). Length of hospital stay was shorter in group L (p=0.35). The complication rate was 4.2% in patients who had laparoscopic procedures, and was 6.1% in patients who underwent open surgery (p=0.57). Seventy-three percent (n=11) of re-hospitalized patients in the perioperative period (n=15) were treated conservatively. When costs related to secondary interventions and re-hospitalization were included, there was no significant difference between laparoscopic and open surgery groups in terms of cost (p=0.06).
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery for PUP is a reliable method and has been used increasingly over the years in our department. The operative time is longer, the length of hospital stay is shorter, the complication rates are less than open surgery, and the conversion rate is significantly reduced. Laparoscopic GP is feasible in early-admitted patients with PUP, due to the above-mentioned advantages. We believe the rate of conversion to open surgery decreases with increasing experience in laparoscopy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Graham-patch; Laparoscopy; peptic ulcer perforation

Year:  2014        PMID: 25931911      PMCID: PMC4379850          DOI: 10.5152/UCD.2014.2640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg        ISSN: 1300-0705


  11 in total

1.  Laparoscopic approach to acute abdomen from the Consensus Development Conference of the Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e nuove tecnologie (SICE), Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani (ACOI), Società Italiana di Chirurgia (SIC), Società Italiana di Chirurgia d'Urgenza e del Trauma (SICUT), Società Italiana di Chirurgia nell'Ospedalità Privata (SICOP), and the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Luca Ansaloni; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Carlo Bergamini; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Michele Carlucci; Giafranco Cocorullo; Alessio Corradi; Boris Franzato; Massimo Lupo; Vincenzo Mandalà; Antonino Mirabella; Graziano Pernazza; Micaela Piccoli; Carlo Staudacher; Nereo Vettoretto; Mauro Zago; Emanuele Lettieri; Anna Levati; Domenico Pietrini; Mariano Scaglione; Salvatore De Masi; Giuseppe De Placido; Marsilio Francucci; Monica Rasi; Abe Fingerhut; Selman Uranüs; Silvio Garattini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The simple suture laparoscopic repair of peptic ulcer perforation without an omental patch.

Authors:  M Ates; A Dirican
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  P Mouret; Y François; J Vignal; X Barth; R Lombard-Platet
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 4.  Therapeutic management of perforated gastro-duodenal ulcer: literature review.

Authors:  C Mouly; R Chati; M Scotté; J-M Regimbeau
Journal:  J Visc Surg       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 2.043

5.  Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Wing T Siu; Heng T Leong; Bonita K B Law; Chun H Chau; Anthony C N Li; Kai H Fung; Yuk P Tai; Michael K W Li
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Management strategies, early results, benefits, and risk factors of laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Raimundas Lunevicius; Matas Morkevicius
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Laparoscopic approach in abdominal emergencies: a 5-year experience at a single center.

Authors:  A Agrusa; G Romano; G Di Buono; A Dafnomili; G Gulotta
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec

Review 8.  Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease.

Authors:  Alvaro Sanabria; Maria Isabel Villegas; Carlos Hernando Morales Uribe
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-02-28

9.  Comparison between open and laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer disease.

Authors:  Ricky H Bhogal; Ruvinder Athwal; Damien Durkin; Mark Deakin; Chandra N V Cheruvu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of the perforated peptic ulcer: the LAMA Trial.

Authors:  Mariëtta J O E Bertleff; Jens A Halm; Willem A Bemelman; Arie C van der Ham; Erwin van der Harst; Hok I Oei; J F Smulders; E W Steyerberg; Johan F Lange
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  1 in total

1.  Assessment of PULP score in predicting 30-day perforated duodenal ulcer morbidity, and comparison of its performance with Boey and ASA, a retrospective study.

Authors:  Tamer Saafan; Walid El Ansari; Omer Al-Yahri; Ammar Eleter; Hisham Eljohary; Rashad Alfkey; Mustafa Hajjar; Ali Toffaha; Abdelrahman El Osta
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2019-05-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.