Literature DB >> 25931910

Can horizontal diameter of colorectal tumor help predict prognosis?

Ahmet Ziya Balta1, Yavuz Özdemir1, İlker Sücüllü1, Serhat Tolga Derici1, Mahir Bağcı2, Dilaver Demirel3, Mehmet Levhi Akın1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the relationship between the horizontal tumor diameter and prognosis.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients' records were analyzed retrospectively. Patient data, including age, gender, vertical penetration, anatomic location, differentiation of the tumor, tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage, survival rate, and disease-free survival, were analyzed to find out if there was any correlation with horizontal tumor diameter.
RESULTS: A total of 439 colorectal cancer patients were enrolled. Patients were stratified into two groups according to the horizontal tumor diameter (≤4.5 cm vs. >4.5 cm). Poorly differentiated tumors were significantly larger than other differentiation groups (p=0.003). The horizontal diameter increased with increase in T-stage (p<0.001). Similarly, the number of positive lymph nodes increased significantly as the size of the horizontal tumor diameter increased (p<0.001). The relationship between TNM staging and the horizontal diameter of tumors in both groups was examined, and it was found that the progression of tumor stage was accompanied by increased horizontal diameter (p<0.001). It was also found that the horizontal tumor diameter was not correlated with local recurrence (p=0.063). However, distant metastasis was higher in patients with a tumor larger than 4.5 cm (p=0.02). Although the disease-free survival was shorter in patients with a horizontal tumor diameter more than 4.5 cm, the difference was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: There is a significant relation between horizontal diameter of the tumor and depth of the tumor, lymph node involvement, overall survival, and distant metastasis. Horizontal diameter of the tumor can possibly be used as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colon; horizontal diameter; prognosis; rectum; tumor

Year:  2014        PMID: 25931910      PMCID: PMC4379853          DOI: 10.5152/UCD.2014.2701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg        ISSN: 1300-0705


  28 in total

1.  Determining prognostic factors for gastric cancer using the regression tree method.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Yamamura; Toshifusa Nakajima; Keiichiro Ohta; Atsushi Nashimoto; Kuniyoshi Arai; Masahiro Hiratsuka; Mitsuru Sasako; Yasuhiro Kodera; Masashi Goto
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Number of lymph node metastases is better predictor of prognosis than level of lymph node metastasis in patients with node-positive colon cancer.

Authors:  On Suzuki; Yoshiaki Sekishita; Tuneo Shiono; Koichi Ono; Masaru Fujimori; Satoshi Kondo
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Prognostic value of the lymph node ratio in node positive colon cancer.

Authors:  M De Ridder; V Vinh-Hung; Y Van Nieuwenhove; A Hoorens; A Sermeus; G Storme
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  A worldwide approach to the TNM staging system: collaborative efforts of the AJCC and UICC.

Authors:  Frederick L Greene; Leslie H Sobin
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  The clinicopathological characteristics and outcome of patients with right colon cancer.

Authors:  H Tomoda; A Taketomi; H Baba; S Kohnoe; Y Seo; T Saito
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 6.  Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review.

Authors:  George J Chang; Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas; John M Skibber; Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Histopathologic criteria for local excision of colorectal cancer: multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Y Adachi; K Yasuda; K Kakisako; K Sato; N Shiraishi; S Kitano
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Predictive histopathologic factors for lymph node metastasis in patients with nonpedunculated submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Kenji Tominaga; Yukihiro Nakanishi; Satoshi Nimura; Kimio Yoshimura; Yoshihiro Sakai; Tadakazu Shimoda
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Tumor size is associated with the systemic inflammatory response but not survival in patients with primary operable colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Joseph Em Crozier; Donald C McMillan; Colin S McArdle; Wilson J Angerson; John H Anderson; Paul G Horgan; Ruth F McKee
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.029

10.  Size does not determine the grade of malignancy of early invasive colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Takahisa Matsuda; Yutaka Saito; Takahiro Fujii; Toshio Uraoka; Takeshi Nakajima; Nozomu Kobayashi; Fabian Emura; Akiko Ono; Tadakazu Shimoda; Hiroaki Ikematsu; Kuang I Fu; Yasushi Sano; Takahiro Fujimori
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more
  2 in total

1.  Smaller tumor size is associated with poor survival in T4b colon cancer.

Authors:  Ben Huang; Yang Feng; Shao-Bo Mo; San-Jun Cai; Li-Yong Huang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Advanced imaging of colorectal cancer: From anatomy to molecular imaging.

Authors:  Roberto García-Figueiras; Sandra Baleato-González; Anwar R Padhani; Ana Marhuenda; Antonio Luna; Lidia Alcalá; Ana Carballo-Castro; Ana Álvarez-Castro
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2016-04-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.