Literature DB >> 25931163

No increase in prevalence of somatization in functional vs organic dyspepsia: a cross-sectional survey.

D J Gracie1,2, P Bercik3, D G Morgan4, C Bolino3, M I Pintos-Sanchez3, P Moayyedi3, A C Ford1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Psychological factors are associated with functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorders. Literature suggests that somatization is associated with functional dyspepsia (FD). However, the relationship between organic dyspepsia (OD), FD, and FD subtypes and somatization is poorly described. We aimed to examine this issue in a cross-sectional study of secondary care patients.
METHODS: Demographic and GI symptom data were collected from 4224 adult patients via the Rome III questionnaire. Somatization data were collected using the patient health questionnaire-12. Mean somatization score and number of somatic symptoms were compared between patients with organic and FD, and between FD subtypes using analysis of variance. The same comparison was undertaken for the proportion of patients reporting individual somatic symptoms. KEY
RESULTS: Exactly, 783 patients met criteria for dyspepsia, of whom 231 (29.5%) had organic disease following upper GI endoscopy. Mean somatization scores and number of somatic symptoms were no higher in functional vs OD (p = 0.23; p = 0.19). In addition, while the prevalence of somatization in FD was relatively high, there was no difference in severity of somatization in FD subgroups. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Somatization is associated with functional and OD to the same degree. Overall severity of somatization did not appear to vary according to FD subtype.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  epigastric pain; postprandial distress; somatization; symptom severity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25931163     DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  6 in total

1.  The challenges of evolving Rome criteria for functional dyspepsia.

Authors:  Craig A Friesen; Jennifer V Schurman
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-09-14

Review 2.  Functional Dyspepsia: Advances in Diagnosis and Therapy.

Authors:  Nicholas J Talley
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 4.519

3.  Rome III, Rome IV, and Potential Asia Symptom Criteria for Functional Dyspepsia Do Not Reliably Distinguish Functional From Organic Disease.

Authors:  Zhongcao Wei; Qian Yang; Qi Yang; Juan Yang; Xinxing Tantai; Xin Xing; Cailan Xiao; Yanglin Pan; Na Liu; Jinhai Wang
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 4.396

4.  Developing the Patient Health Questionnaire-8 for a greater impact on the quality of life of patients with functional dyspepsia compared to Somatic Symptom Scale-8.

Authors:  Chaoqun Yuan; Guizhen Yong; Xi Wang; Ting Xie; Chunyan Wang; Yuan Yuan; Guobin He
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Predictive value of alarm symptoms in patients with Rome IV dyspepsia: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Zhong-Cao Wei; Qian Yang; Qi Yang; Juan Yang; Xin-Xing Tantai; Xin Xing; Cai-Lan Xiao; Yang-Lin Pan; Jin-Hai Wang; Na Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Somatic Complaints Are Significantly Associated with Chronic Uninvestigated Dyspepsia and Its Symptoms: A Large Cross-sectional Population Based Study.

Authors:  Zahra Heidari; Ammar Hassanzadeh Keshteli; Awat Feizi; Hamid Afshar; Payman Adibi
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 4.924

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.