Literature DB >> 25930243

Perspectives of Canadian Stakeholders on Criteria for Appropriateness for Total Joint Arthroplasty in Patients With Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis.

Gillian Hawker1, Eric R Bohm2, Barbara Conner-Spady3, Carolyn De Coster3, Michael Dunbar4, Allan Hennigar4, Lynda Loucks5, Deborah A Marshall3, Marie-Pascale Pomey6, Claudia Sanmartin7, Tom Noseworthy3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: As rates of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) for osteoarthritis (OA) rise, there is a need to ensure appropriate use. We undertook this study to develop criteria for appropriate use of TJA.
METHODS: In prior work, we used qualitative methods to separately assess OA patients' and arthroplasty surgeons' perceptions regarding appropriateness of patient candidates for TJA. The current study reviewed the appropriateness themes that emerged from each group, and a series of statements were developed to reflect each unique theme or criterion. A group of arthroplasty surgeons then indicated their level of agreement with each statement using electronic voting. Where ≤70% agreed or disagreed, the criterion was discussed and revised, and revoting occurred. In standardized telephone interviews, OA patient focus group participants indicated their level of agreement with each revised criterion.
RESULTS: Qualitative research in 58 OA patients and 14 arthroplasty surgeons identified 11 appropriateness criteria. Member-checking in 15 surgeons (including 5 who had participated in the qualitative study) resulted in agreement on 6 revised criteria. These included evidence of arthritis on joint examination, patient-reported symptoms negatively impacting quality of life, an adequate trial of appropriate nonsurgical treatment, realistic patient expectations of surgery, mental and physical readiness of patient for surgery, and patient-surgeon agreement that potential benefits exceed risks. Thirty-six of the original 58 OA patient focus group participants (62.1%) participated in the member-check interviews and endorsed all 6 criteria.
CONCLUSION: Patients and surgeons jointly endorsed 6 criteria for assessment of TJA appropriateness in OA patients. Prospective validation of these criteria (assessed preoperatively) as predictive of postoperative patient-reported outcomes is under way and will inform development of a surgeon-patient decision-support tool for assessment of TJA appropriateness.
© 2015, American College of Rheumatology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25930243     DOI: 10.1002/art.39124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol        ISSN: 2326-5191            Impact factor:   10.995


  19 in total

1.  Prevalence of similar or worse symptom and osteoarthritis severity of index and contralateral knees prior to knee arthroplasty: A cross-sectional multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Daniel L Riddle
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Support Tools for Preference-Sensitive Decisions in Healthcare: Where Are We? Where Do We Go? How Do We Get There?

Authors:  Jan Ostermann; Derek S Brown; Janine A van Til; Nick Bansback; France Légaré; Deborah A Marshall; Meenakshi Bewtra
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Arthroscopic meniscal surgery: a national society treatment guideline and consensus statement.

Authors:  S G F Abram; D J Beard; A J Price
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  Diagnostic validity and triage concordance of a physiotherapist compared to physicians' diagnoses for common knee disorders.

Authors:  S Décary; M Fallaha; B Pelletier; P Frémont; J Martel-Pelletier; J-P Pelletier; D E Feldman; M-P Sylvestre; P-A Vendittoli; F Desmeules
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Patient expectations and satisfaction 6 and 12 months following total hip and knee replacement.

Authors:  Barbara L Conner-Spady; Eric Bohm; Lynda Loucks; Michael J Dunbar; Deborah A Marshall; Tom W Noseworthy
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Utilization and Short-Term Outcomes of Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States and Canada: An Analysis of New York and Ontario Administrative Data.

Authors:  Peter Cram; Bruce E Landon; John Matelski; Vicki Ling; Therese A Stukel; J Michael Paterson; Rajiv Gandhi; Gillian A Hawker; Bheeshma Ravi
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 10.995

7.  Presurgery osteoarthritis severity over 10 years in 2 Ontario prospective total knee replacement cohorts: a cohort study.

Authors:  Aileen M Davis; Selahadin Ibrahim; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Dorcas E Beaton; Bert M Chesworth; Rajiv Gandhi; Nizar N Mahomed; Anthony V Perruccio; Vaishnav Rajgopal; Rosalind Wong; James P Waddell
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2018-07-19

8.  Defining and evaluating a novel outcome measure representing end-stage knee osteoarthritis: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Driban; Lori Lyn Price; John Lynch; Michael Nevitt; Grace H Lo; Charles B Eaton; Timothy E McAlindon
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 2.980

9. 

Authors:  Codie A Primeau; Trevor B Birmingham; Kristyn M Leitch; Kevin R Willits; Robert B Litchfield; Peter J Fowler; Jacquelyn D Marsh; Bert M Chesworth; Stephanie N Dixon; Dianne M Bryant; J Robert Giffin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 16.859

10.  Optimizing the interprofessional workforce for centralized intake of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid disease: case study.

Authors:  Esther Suter; Arden Birney; Paola Charland; Renee Misfeldt; Stephen Weiss; Jane Squire Howden; Jennifer Hendricks; Theresa Lupton; Deborah Marshall
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2015-05-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.