Benjamin A Steinberg1,2, Melissa A Greiner1, Bradley G Hammill1, Lesley H Curtis1,2, Emelia J Benjamin3,4, Susan R Heckbert5, Jonathan P Piccini1,2. 1. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA. 2. Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA. 3. Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, Massachusetts, USA. 4. Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5. Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: Oral anticoagulation therapy prevents stroke and improves survival in patients with atrial fibrillation, but the therapy is underutilized. We sought to identify the prevalence of contraindications for oral anticoagulation and the proportion of patients potentially eligible for different agents. METHODS: We identified patients with nonacute atrial fibrillation in a nationally representative 5% sample of 2009 Medicare data. We divided the population into patients ineligible for any oral anticoagulant, patients eligible for warfarin only, and patients eligible for any anticoagulant. We compared patient characteristics and the use of anticoagulation among the subgroups. RESULTS: Among 86,671 patients with atrial fibrillation, 1872 (2.2%) were ineligible for anticoagulation because of an absolute contraindication, most frequently a history of intracranial hemorrhage (60%). Patients ineligible for any anticoagulant were the same age as the overall group (mean age, 80.5 vs. 80.4 years). However, they had higher rates of dementia (19% vs. 8.6%) and heart failure (59% vs. 43%) and higher mean CHADS2 scores (3.8 vs. 2.8). Of the remaining 84,799 patients eligible for anticoagulation, 7146 (8.4%) were eligible for warfarin only (most commonly because of mechanical heart valves [66%] and end-stage renal disease [12%]). Sixty-five percent of patients eligible for anticoagulation received warfarin, and the proportion was similar for patients with a relatively high risk of bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Older adults with atrial fibrillation rarely have absolute contraindications to oral anticoagulation therapy. Among patients without contraindications, most appeared to be eligible for any anticoagulant, and relatively high-risk features appeared not to influence warfarin use.
AIMS: Oral anticoagulation therapy prevents stroke and improves survival in patients with atrial fibrillation, but the therapy is underutilized. We sought to identify the prevalence of contraindications for oral anticoagulation and the proportion of patients potentially eligible for different agents. METHODS: We identified patients with nonacute atrial fibrillation in a nationally representative 5% sample of 2009 Medicare data. We divided the population into patients ineligible for any oral anticoagulant, patients eligible for warfarin only, and patients eligible for any anticoagulant. We compared patient characteristics and the use of anticoagulation among the subgroups. RESULTS: Among 86,671 patients with atrial fibrillation, 1872 (2.2%) were ineligible for anticoagulation because of an absolute contraindication, most frequently a history of intracranial hemorrhage (60%). Patients ineligible for any anticoagulant were the same age as the overall group (mean age, 80.5 vs. 80.4 years). However, they had higher rates of dementia (19% vs. 8.6%) and heart failure (59% vs. 43%) and higher mean CHADS2 scores (3.8 vs. 2.8). Of the remaining 84,799 patients eligible for anticoagulation, 7146 (8.4%) were eligible for warfarin only (most commonly because of mechanical heart valves [66%] and end-stage renal disease [12%]). Sixty-five percent of patients eligible for anticoagulation received warfarin, and the proportion was similar for patients with a relatively high risk of bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Older adults with atrial fibrillation rarely have absolute contraindications to oral anticoagulation therapy. Among patients without contraindications, most appeared to be eligible for any anticoagulant, and relatively high-risk features appeared not to influence warfarin use.
Authors: Laura G Qualls; Melissa A Greiner; Zubin J Eapen; Gregg C Fonarow; Roger M Mills; Winslow Klaskala; Adrian F Hernandez; Lesley H Curtis Journal: Clin Cardiol Date: 2013-10-01 Impact factor: 2.882
Authors: Luke Seaburg; Erik P Hess; Megan Coylewright; Henry H Ting; Christopher J McLeod; Victor M Montori Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-02-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Robert P Giugliano; Christian T Ruff; Eugene Braunwald; Sabina A Murphy; Stephen D Wiviott; Jonathan L Halperin; Albert L Waldo; Michael D Ezekowitz; Jeffrey I Weitz; Jindřich Špinar; Witold Ruzyllo; Mikhail Ruda; Yukihiro Koretsune; Joshua Betcher; Minggao Shi; Laura T Grip; Shirali P Patel; Indravadan Patel; James J Hanyok; Michele Mercuri; Elliott M Antman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-11-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Benjamin A Steinberg; Dajuanicia N Holmes; Jonathan P Piccini; Jack Ansell; Paul Chang; Gregg C Fonarow; Bernard Gersh; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Peter R Kowey; Michael D Ezekowitz; Daniel E Singer; Laine Thomas; Eric D Peterson; Elaine M Hylek Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2013-11-25 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Paweł Balsam; Agata Tymińska; Krzysztof Ozierański; Martyna Zaleska; Katarzyna Żukowska; Katarzyna Szepietowska; Kacper Maciejewski; Michał Peller; Marcin Grabowski; Piotr Lodziński; Łukasz Kołtowski; Anna Praska-Ogińska; Inna Zaboyska; Janusz Bednarski; Krzysztof J Filipiak; Grzegorz Opolski Journal: Cardiol J Date: 2018-11-08 Impact factor: 2.737
Authors: Benjamin A Steinberg; Nicholas G Ballew; Melissa A Greiner; Steven J Lippmann; Lesley H Curtis; Emily C O'Brien; Manesh R Patel; Jonathan P Piccini Journal: JACC Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2019-10-02