Literature DB >> 25930017

In vitro comparison of polymerisation kinetics and the micro-mechanical properties of low and high viscosity giomers and RBC materials.

Nicoleta Ilie1, Garry J P Fleming2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The study aims to characterise a low and high viscosity giomer bulk fill resin restorative with established low and high viscosity resin-based composite (RBC) restoratives at simulated clinical relevant specimen depths.
METHODS: The irradiance of a light curing unit (Bluephase 20i) was measured on a laboratory-grade spectrometer at distances up to 10mm from the light tip (in 1mm increments). Polymerization kinetics (real-time decrease of CC double bond and degree of cure, DC) and micro-mechanical properties (Vickers hardness/HV; Depth of cure/DOC; Indentation modulus/E) were assessed at varying specimen depths (0.1-6mm in 100μm steps for E, DOC and HV and 0.1, 2, 4 and 6mm for DC) for a 20s irradiation.
RESULTS: One and two-way ANOVA (α=0.05) were performed. The parameter material has a significant (p<0.001) effect on DC (ηP(2)=0.839), HV (ηP(2)=0.683), and E (ηP(2)=0.536), whereas the specimen depth influenced only DC (ηP(2)=0.584) but not HV (p=0.093) or E (p=0.133). The polymerisation kinetic could be described by an exponential sum function, distinguishing between the gel and the glass phase. The hardness drop out was lower than 20%, indicated a depth of cure of 6mm for all materials.
CONCLUSIONS: The low and high viscosity giomer bulk-fill restoratives fulfil the requirements of bulk-fill placement, since under the analysed irradiation conditions an adequate depth of cure of >4mm was identified. Variation of DC with specimen depth was low, with little variation at specimen depths of <4mm. The micro-mechanical properties of the giomer materials were higher compared with the conventional RBC materials.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bulk fill; Giomers; Hardness; Modulus of elasticity; Polymerisation kinetics; Resin based composite

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25930017     DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  7 in total

1.  Comparative Effect of Self- or Dual-Curing on Polymerization Kinetics and Mechanical Properties in a Novel, Dental-Resin-Based Composite with Alkaline Filler. Running Title: Resin-Composites with Alkaline Fillers.

Authors:  Nicoleta Ilie
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.623

2.  Structural and mechanical properties of a giomer-based bulk fill restorative in different curing conditions.

Authors:  Mustafa Sarp Kaya; Meltem Bakkal; Ali Durmus; Zehra Durmus
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 2.698

3.  A Deep Morphological Characterization and Comparison of Different Dental Restorative Materials.

Authors:  R Condò; L Cerroni; G Pasquantonio; M Mancini; A Pecora; A Convertino; V Mussi; A Rinaldi; L Maiolo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Polymerization kinetics of experimental resin composites functionalized with conventional (45S5) and a customized low-sodium fluoride-containing bioactive glass.

Authors:  Matej Par; Katica Prskalo; Tobias T Tauböck; Hrvoje Skenderovic; Thomas Attin; Zrinka Tarle
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Polymerization Kinetics and Development of Polymerization Shrinkage Stress in Rapid High-Intensity Light-Curing.

Authors:  Matej Par; Phoebe Burrer; Katica Prskalo; Saskia Schmid; Anna-Lena Schubiger; Danijela Marovic; Zrinka Tarle; Thomas Attin; Tobias T Tauböck
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.967

6.  Fracture resistance of posterior teeth restored with high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites in comparison to the incremental placement technique.

Authors:  Vibha Hegde; Amrita Vilas Sali
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct

7.  Evaluation of low-viscosity bulk-fill composites regarding marginal and internal adaptation.

Authors:  Kyung-Jin Park; Manon Pfeffer; Thomas Näke; Hartmut Schneider; Dirk Ziebolz; Rainer Haak
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 2.634

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.