| Literature DB >> 25929957 |
Sylvie Lantuejoul1, Isabelle Rouquette2, Hélène Blons3, Nolwenn Le Stang4, Marius Ilie5, Hugues Begueret6, Valerie Grégoire7, Paul Hofman5, Audrey Gros6, Stephane Garcia8, Nathalie Monhoven9, Mojgan Devouassoux-Shisheboran10, Audrey Mansuet-Lupo11, Françoise Thivolet12, Martine Antoine13, Jean-Michel Vignaud9, Frederique Penault-Llorca14, Françoise Galateau-Sallé4, Anne McLeer-Florin15.
Abstract
Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements in lung adenocarcinoma result in kinase activity targetable by crizotinib. Although fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) is the reference diagnostic technique, immunohistochemistry (IHC) could be useful for pre-screening. Diagnostic yields of ALK IHC, FISH and quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR performed in 14 French pathology/molecular genetics platforms were compared. 547 lung adenocarcinoma specimens were analysed using 5A4 and D5F3 antibodies, two break-apart FISH probes and TaqMan kits. Clinicopathological data were recorded. 140 tumours were ALK rearranged (FISH with ≥15% of rearranged cells) and 400 were ALK FISH negative (<15%). FISH was not interpretable for seven cases. ALK patients were young (p=0.003), mostly females (p=0.007) and light/nonsmokers (p<0.0001). 13 cases were IHC negative but FISH ≥15%, including six cases with FISH between 15% and 20%; eight were IHC positive with FISH between 10% and 14%. Sensitivity and specificity for 5A4 and D5F3 were 87% and 92%, and 89% and 76%, respectively. False-negative IHC, observed in 2.4% of cases, dropped to 1.3% for FISH >20%. Variants were undetected in 36% of ALK tumours. Discordances predominated with FISH ranging from 10% to 20% of rearranged cells and were centre dependent. IHC remains a reliable pre-screening method for ALK rearrangement detection.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25929957 DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00119914
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Respir J ISSN: 0903-1936 Impact factor: 16.671