V C C Cheng1, P H Chau2, W M Lee3, S K Y Ho3, D W Y Lee3, S Y C So4, S C Y Wong4, J W M Tai3, K Y Yuen5. 1. Department of Microbiology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China; Infection Control Team, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China. 2. School of Nursing, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. 3. Infection Control Team, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China. 4. Department of Microbiology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China. 5. Department of Microbiology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China. Electronic address: kyyuen@hkucc.hku.hk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Unlike direct contact with patients' body, hand hygiene practice is often neglected by healthcare workers (HCWs) and visitors after contact with patients' environment. Contact with hospital environmental items may increase risk of pathogen transmission. AIM: To enumerate the number of hand-touch contacts by patients, HCWs and visitors with any hospital environmental items. METHODS: All contact-episodes between person and item were recorded by direct observation in a six-bed cubicle of acute wards for 33 working days. High-touch and mutual-touch items with high contact frequencies by HCWs, patients, and visitors were analysed. FINDINGS: In total, 1107 person-episodes with 6144 contact-episodes were observed in 66 observation hours (average: 16.8 person-episodes and 93.1 contact-episodes per hour). Eight of the top 10 high-touch items, including bedside rails, bedside tables, patients' bodies, patients' files, linen, bed curtains, bed frames, and lockers were mutually touched by HCWs, patients, and visitors. Bedside rails topped the list with 13.6 contact-episodes per hour (mean), followed by bedside tables (12.3 contact-episodes per hour). Using patients' body contacts as a reference, it was found that medical staff and nursing staff contacted bedside tables [rate ratio (RR): 1.741, 1.427, respectively] and patients' files (RR: 1.358, 1.324, respectively) more than patients' bodies, and nursing staff also contacted bedside rails (RR: 1.490) more than patients' bodies. CONCLUSION: Patients' surroundings may be links in the transmission of nosocomial infections because many are frequently touched and mutually contacted by HCWs, patients, and visitors. Therefore, the focus of hand hygiene education, environmental disinfection, and other system changes should be enhanced with respect to high-touch and mutual-touch items.
BACKGROUND: Unlike direct contact with patients' body, hand hygiene practice is often neglected by healthcare workers (HCWs) and visitors after contact with patients' environment. Contact with hospital environmental items may increase risk of pathogen transmission. AIM: To enumerate the number of hand-touch contacts by patients, HCWs and visitors with any hospital environmental items. METHODS: All contact-episodes between person and item were recorded by direct observation in a six-bed cubicle of acute wards for 33 working days. High-touch and mutual-touch items with high contact frequencies by HCWs, patients, and visitors were analysed. FINDINGS: In total, 1107 person-episodes with 6144 contact-episodes were observed in 66 observation hours (average: 16.8 person-episodes and 93.1 contact-episodes per hour). Eight of the top 10 high-touch items, including bedside rails, bedside tables, patients' bodies, patients' files, linen, bed curtains, bed frames, and lockers were mutually touched by HCWs, patients, and visitors. Bedside rails topped the list with 13.6 contact-episodes per hour (mean), followed by bedside tables (12.3 contact-episodes per hour). Using patients' body contacts as a reference, it was found that medical staff and nursing staff contacted bedside tables [rate ratio (RR): 1.741, 1.427, respectively] and patients' files (RR: 1.358, 1.324, respectively) more than patients' bodies, and nursing staff also contacted bedside rails (RR: 1.490) more than patients' bodies. CONCLUSION:Patients' surroundings may be links in the transmission of nosocomial infections because many are frequently touched and mutually contacted by HCWs, patients, and visitors. Therefore, the focus of hand hygiene education, environmental disinfection, and other system changes should be enhanced with respect to high-touch and mutual-touch items.
Authors: Michael G Schmidt; Hubert H Attaway; Sarah E Fairey; Jayna Howard; Denise Mohr; Stephanie Craig Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2019-12-13 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Shi Chen; Suzanne Lenhart; Judy D Day; Chihoon Lee; Michael Dulin; Cristina Lanzas Journal: Math Med Biol Date: 2018-09-11 Impact factor: 1.854
Authors: T Latha; Anil K Bhat; H Manjunatha Hande; Chiranjay Mukhopadhyay; Elsa Sanatombi Devi; Baby S Nayak; Anice George Journal: Indian J Orthop Date: 2022-08-20 Impact factor: 1.033
Authors: Tanya Purwar; Shamya Dey; Osama Zaid Ali Al-Kayyali; Aaron Floyd Zalar; Ali Doosttalab; Luciano Castillo; Victor M Castano Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-13 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Tina Z Wang; Matthew S Simon; Lars F Westblade; Lisa Saiman; E Yoko Furuya; David P Calfee Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2020-10-06 Impact factor: 3.254