Literature DB >> 25929619

Using within-subject pattern classification to understand lifespan age differences in oscillatory mechanisms of working memory selection and maintenance.

Julian D Karch1, Myriam C Sander2, Timo von Oertzen3, Andreas M Brandmaier2, Markus Werkle-Bergner4.   

Abstract

In lifespan studies, large within-group heterogeneity with regard to behavioral and neuronal data is observed. This casts doubt on the validity of group-statistics-based approaches to understand age-related changes on cognitive and neural levels. Recent progress in brain-computer interface research demonstrates the potential of machine learning techniques to derive reliable person-specific models, representing brain behavior mappings. The present study now proposes a supervised learning approach to derive person-specific models for the identification and quantification of interindividual differences in oscillatory EEG responses related to working memory selection and maintenance mechanisms in a heterogeneous lifespan sample. EEG data were used to discriminate different levels of working memory load and the focus of visual attention. We demonstrate that our approach leads to person-specific models with better discrimination performance compared to classical person-nonspecific models. We show how these models can be interpreted both on an individual as well as on a group level. One of the key findings is that, with regard to the time dimension, the between-person variance of the obtained person-specific models is smaller in older than in younger adults. This is contrary to what we expected because of increased behavioral and neuronal heterogeneity in older adults.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; Lifespan age differences; Prediction; Single-trial analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25929619     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  6 in total

1.  Bridging the Nomothetic and Idiographic Approaches to the Analysis of Clinical Data.

Authors:  Adriene M Beltz; Aidan G C Wright; Briana N Sprague; Peter C M Molenaar
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2016-08

2.  Riemannian classification of single-trial surface EEG and sources during checkerboard and navigational images in humans.

Authors:  Cédric Simar; Robin Petit; Nichita Bozga; Axelle Leroy; Ana-Maria Cebolla; Mathieu Petieau; Gianluca Bontempi; Guy Cheron
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Individualized Modeling to Distinguish Between High and Low Arousal States Using Physiological Data.

Authors:  Ame Osotsi; Zita Oravecz; Qunhua Li; Joshua Smyth; Timothy R Brick
Journal:  J Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2020-01-22

4.  Predicting visual working memory with multimodal magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Yu Xiao; Ying Lin; Junji Ma; Jiehui Qian; Zijun Ke; Liangfang Li; Yangyang Yi; Jinbo Zhang; Zhengjia Dai
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 5.  Frontal alpha asymmetry as a diagnostic marker in depression: Fact or fiction? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nikita van der Vinne; Madelon A Vollebregt; Michel J A M van Putten; Martijn Arns
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 4.881

6.  Gaussian Process Panel Modeling-Machine Learning Inspired Analysis of Longitudinal Panel Data.

Authors:  Julian D Karch; Andreas M Brandmaier; Manuel C Voelkle
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-03-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.