Literature DB >> 25929599

Distinct neural processes are engaged in the modulation of mimicry by social group-membership and emotional expressions.

Birgit Rauchbauer1, Jasminka Majdandžić1, Allan Hummer2, Christian Windischberger2, Claus Lamm3.   

Abstract

People often spontaneously engage in copying each other's postures and mannerisms, a phenomenon referred to as behavioral mimicry. Social psychology experiments indicate that mimicry denotes an implicit affiliative signal flexibly regulated in response to social requirements. Yet, the mediating processes and neural underpinnings of such regulation are largely unexplored. The present functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study examined mimicry regulation by combining an automatic imitation task with facial stimuli, varied on two social-affective dimensions: emotional expression (angry vs happy) and ethnic group membership (in- vs out-group). Behavioral data revealed increased mimicry when happy and when out-group faces were shown. Imaging results revealed that mimicry regulation in response to happy faces was associated with increased activation in the right temporo-parietal junction (TPJ), right dorsal premotor cortex (dPMC), and right superior parietal lobule (SPL). Mimicry regulation in response to out-group faces was related to increased activation in the left ventral premotor cortex (vPMC) and inferior parietal lobule (IPL), bilateral anterior insula, and mid-cingulate cortex (MCC). We suggest that mimicry in response to happy and to out-group faces is driven by distinct affiliative goals, and that mimicry regulation to attain these goals is mediated by distinct neuro-cognitive processes. Higher mimicry in response to happy faces seems to denote reciprocation of an affiliative signal. Higher mimicry in response to out-group faces, reflects an appeasement attempt towards an interaction partner perceived as threatening (an interpretation supported by implicit measures showing that out-group members are more strongly associated with threat). Our findings show that subtle social cues can result in the implicit regulation of mimicry. This regulation serves to achieve distinct affiliative goals, is mediated by different regulatory processes, and relies on distinct parts of an overarching network of task-related brain areas. Our findings shed new light on the neural mechanisms underlying the interplay between implicit action control and social cognition.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Affiliation; Chameleon effect; Emotional expressions; Imitation; Mimicry

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25929599     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  19 in total

1.  The influence of group membership on cross-contextual imitation.

Authors:  Oliver Genschow; Simon Schindler
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

2.  Converging electrophysiological evidence for a processing advantage of social over nonsocial feedback.

Authors:  Daniela M Pfabigan; Shihui Han
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Interplay of self-other distinction and cognitive control mechanisms in a social automatic imitation task: An ERP study.

Authors:  B Rauchbauer; C Lorenz; C Lamm; D M Pfabigan
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Dynamic emotional expressions do not modulate responses to gestures.

Authors:  Harry Farmer; Raqeeb Mahmood; Samantha E A Gregory; Polina Tishina; Antonia F de C Hamilton
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2020-12-10

5.  The Modulation of Mimicry by Ethnic Group-Membership and Emotional Expressions.

Authors:  Birgit Rauchbauer; Jasminka Majdandžić; Stefan Stieger; Claus Lamm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Young Children's Motor Interference Is Influenced by Novel Group Membership.

Authors:  Johanna E van Schaik; Hinke M Endedijk; Janny C Stapel; Sabine Hunnius
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-08

7.  The Emotional Modulation of Facial Mimicry: A Kinematic Study.

Authors:  Antonella Tramacere; Pier F Ferrari; Maurizio Gentilucci; Valeria Giuffrida; Doriana De Marco
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-01-18

8.  Moving higher and higher: imitators' movements are sensitive to observed trajectories regardless of action rationality.

Authors:  Paul A G Forbes; Antonia F de C Hamilton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Status and Power Do Not Modulate Automatic Imitation of Intransitive Hand Movements.

Authors:  Harry Farmer; Evan W Carr; Marita Svartdal; Piotr Winkielman; Antonia F de C Hamilton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Group Dynamics in Automatic Imitation.

Authors:  Ilka H Gleibs; Neil Wilson; Geetha Reddy; Caroline Catmur
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.