Literature DB >> 25929506

Cost and outcomes of assessing patients with chest pain in an Australian emergency department.

Louise Cullen1, Jaimi Greenslade2, Katharina Merollini2, Nicholas Graves2, Christopher J K Hammett3, Tracey Hawkins3, Martin P Than4, Anthony F T Brown3, Christopher B Huang5, Seyed E Panahi5, Emily Dalton3, William A Parsonage3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to characterise the demographics, length of admission, final diagnoses, long-term outcome and costs associated with the population who presented to an Australian emergency department (ED) with symptoms of possible acute coronary syndrome (ACS). DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospectively collected data on ED patients presenting with suspected ACS between November 2008 and February 2011 was used, including data on presentation and at 30 days after presentation. Information on patient disposition, length of stay and costs incurred was extracted from hospital administration records. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were mean and median cost and length of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes were diagnosis of ACS, other cardiovascular conditions or non-cardiovascular conditions within 30 days of presentation.
RESULTS: An ACS was diagnosed in 103 (11.1%) of the 926 patients recruited. 193 patients (20.8%) were diagnosed with other cardiovascular-related conditions and 622 patients (67.2%) had non-cardiac-related chest pain. ACS events occurred in 0 and 11 (1.9%) of the low-risk and intermediate-risk groups, respectively. Ninety-two (28.0%) of the 329 high-risk patients had an ACS event. Patients with a proven ACS, high-grade atrioventricular block, pulmonary embolism and other respiratory conditions had the longest length of stay. The mean cost was highest in the ACS group ($13 509; 95% CI, $11 794-$15 223) followed by other cardiovascular conditions ($7283; 95% CI, $6152-$8415) and non-cardiovascular conditions ($3331; 95% CI, $2976-$3685).
CONCLUSIONS: Most ED patients with symptoms of possible ACS do not have a cardiac cause for their presentation. The current guideline-based process of assessment is lengthy, costly and consumes significant resources. Investigation of strategies to shorten this process or reduce the need for objective cardiac testing in patients at intermediate risk according to the National Heart Foundation and Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand guideline is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25929506     DOI: 10.5694/mja14.00472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  17 in total

1.  The Utility of Endoscopic Biopsies in Patients with Normal Upper Endoscopy.

Authors:  Anouar Teriaky; Abdullah AlNasser; Carolyn McLean; James Gregor; Brian Yan
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-07-10

2.  Change to costs and lengths of stay in the emergency department and the Brisbane protocol: an observational study.

Authors:  Qinglu Cheng; Jaimi H Greenslade; William A Parsonage; Adrian G Barnett; Katharina Merollini; Nicholas Graves; W Frank Peacock; Louise Cullen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Clinical features and prognosis of patients with acute non-specific chest pain in emergency and cardiology departments after the introduction of high-sensitivity troponins: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Nivethitha Ilangkovan; Hans Mickley; Axel Diederichsen; Annmarie Lassen; Thomas L Sørensen; Hussam Mahmoud Sheta; Peter B Stæhr; Christian Backer Mogensen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Evaluation and management of patients with acute chest pain in China (EMPACT): protocol for a prospective, multicentre registry study.

Authors:  Wen Zheng; Jiali Wang; Feng Xu; Jiaqi Zheng; He Zhang; Jingjing Ma; Guangmei Wang; Hao Wang; Derek P Chew; Yuguo Chen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  The organisational value of diagnostic strategies using high-sensitivity troponin for patients with possible acute coronary syndromes: a trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Paul Jülicher; Jaimi H Greenslade; William A Parsonage; Louise Cullen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Received care compared to ADP-guided care of patients admitted to hospital with chest pain of possible cardiac origin.

Authors:  Michael Perera; Leena Aggarwal; Ian A Scott; Bentley Logan
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2018-09-03

7.  Comparison of nine coronary risk scores in evaluating patients presenting to hospital with undifferentiated chest pain.

Authors:  Henry Wamala; Leena Aggarwal; Anne Bernard; Ian A Scott
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2018-12-13

8.  Cost-minimisation analysis alongside a pilot study of early Tissue Doppler Evaluation of Diastolic Dysfunction in Emergency Department Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes (TEDDy-NSTEACS).

Authors:  Vijay S Gc; Mohamad Alshurafa; David J Sturgess; Joseph Ting; Kye Gregory; Ana Sofia Oliveira Gonçalves; Jennifer A Whitty
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Clinical and cost-effectiveness of adapted cognitive behaviour therapy for non-cardiac chest pain: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Peter Tyrer; Helen Tyrer; Richard Morriss; Michael Crawford; Sylvia Cooper; Min Yang; Boliang Guo; Roger T Mulder; Samuel Kemp; Barbara Barrett
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2017-05-16

10.  Comparison of outcomes in emergency department patients with suspected cardiac chest pain: two-centre prospective observational study in Southern China.

Authors:  Huilin Jiang; Yunmei Li; Junrong Mo; Xiaohui Chen; Min Li; Peiyi Lin; Kevin K C Hung; Timothy H Rainer; Colin A Graham
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 2.298

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.