Literature DB >> 25929463

Postoperative three-dimensional cervical range of motion and neurological outcomes in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Cervical laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion.

Wei Yuan1, Yue Zhu2, Xinchun Liu1, Haitao Zhu1, Xiaoshu Zhou1, Renyi Zhou1, Cui Cui1, Jie Li1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Laminoplasty (LP) and laminectomy with fusion (LCF) are acceptable surgical options for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). This study focused on evaluating cervical range of motion (ROM) on a three-dimensional basis as well as neurological outcomes after LP and LCF.
METHODS: This prospective cohort study consisted of 38 patients undergoing LP (n=20) or LCF (n=18) from December 2010 to December 2012. Before surgery and at the 3rd, 6th, 12th month follow-up, patients were assessed with three-dimensional cervical ROM, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and complications.
RESULTS: The patients in both groups had significant ROM loss after surgery in six directions of motion. At the 12th month follow-up, the LP group preserved more ROM than LCF in all directions except bilateral rotations. Major reduction was observed in extension, as with only 59.8% and 54.3% ROM preserved in LP and LCF groups. However, the most preserved ROM was witnessed in rotation, especially in the LP group (90.8%). For JOA and VAS, both groups showed significant improvements postoperatively, and the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with OPLL had an obvious reduction in active cervical ROM following LP and LCF. Major reduction was observed in extension, and less impact was detected on rotation. Compared with LCF, LP had better ROM preserved. Both LP and LCF provided patients with significant neurological improvement.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical range of motion; Fusion; Laminectomy; Laminoplasty; Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25929463     DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg        ISSN: 0303-8467            Impact factor:   1.876


  15 in total

1.  Posterior decompression and fusion versus laminoplasty for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ping Xu; Guo-Dong Sun; Lu Xun; Shi-Shu Huang; Zhi-Zhong Li
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Reliability and validity of CODA motion analysis system for measuring cervical range of motion in patients with cervical spondylosis and anterior cervical fusion.

Authors:  Zhongyang Gao; Hui Song; Fenggang Ren; Yuhuan Li; Dong Wang; Xijing He
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Safety and efficacy of cervical laminoplasty using a piezosurgery device compared with a high-speed drill.

Authors:  Kunpeng Li; Wen Zhang; Bin Li; Hui Xu; Zhong Li; Dawei Luo; Jingtao Zhang; Jinzhu Ma
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 4.  Outcomes following Laminoplasty or Laminectomy and Fusion in Patients with Myelopathy Caused by Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Weerasak Singhatanadgige; Worawat Limthongkul; Frank Valone; Wicharn Yingsakmongkol; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2016-02-19

5.  Relationship of actual laminoplasty opening size and increment of the cross-sectional area based on single-door cervical laminoplasy.

Authors:  Xiao-Jiang Yang; Rui-Jun Tian; Xing Su; Shan-Bo Hu; Wei Lei; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 6.  Comparison of laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion in the treatment of multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lei Ma; Feng-Yu Liu; Li-Shuang Huo; Zheng-Qi Zhao; Xian-Ze Sun; Feng Li; Wen-Yuan Ding
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Outcome Evaluation of Modified Uninstrumented Open-door Cervical Laminoplasty for Ossified Posterior Longitudinal Ligament with Cervical Myelopathy.

Authors:  Charanjit Singh Dhillon; Shrikant Rajeshwari Ega; Raviraj Tantry; Narendra Reddy Medagam; Nilay Chhasatia; Chetan Pophale; Anand Khatavi
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 8.  A Systematic Review of Classification Systems for Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.

Authors:  Lindsay Tetreault; Hiroaki Nakashima; So Kato; Michael Kryshtalskyj; Nagoshi Nagoshi; Aria Nouri; Anoushka Singh; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-08-15

9.  The impact of ossification spread on cervical spine function in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

Authors:  Keiichi Katsumi; Takashi Hirai; Toshitaka Yoshii; Satoshi Maki; Kanji Mori; Narihito Nagoshi; Soraya Nishimura; Kazuhiro Takeuchi; Shuta Ushio; Takeo Furuya; Kei Watanabe; Norihiro Nishida; Kota Watanabe; Takashi Kaito; Satoshi Kato; Katsuya Nagashima; Masao Koda; Kenyu Ito; Shiro Imagama; Yuji Matsuoka; Kanichiro Wada; Atsushi Kimura; Tetsuro Ohba; Hiroyuki Katoh; Yukihiro Matsuyama; Hiroshi Ozawa; Hirotaka Haro; Katsushi Takeshita; Masahiko Watanabe; Morio Matsumoto; Masaya Nakamura; Masashi Yamazaki; Atsushi Okawa; Yoshiharu Kawaguchi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Comparison of anterior decompression and fusion versus laminoplasty in the treatment of multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Weijun Liu; Ling Hu; Po-Hsin Chou; Ming Liu; Wusheng Kan; Junwen Wang
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.