Xinjun Li1, Jan Sundquist2,3, Tsuyoshi Hamano4, Bengt Zöller2, Kristina Sundquist2,3. 1. Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University/Region Skåne CRC, Building 28, Floor 11, Jan Waldenströms gata 35, Skåne University Hospital, 205 02, Malmö, Sweden. xinjun.li@med.lu.se. 2. Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University/Region Skåne CRC, Building 28, Floor 11, Jan Waldenströms gata 35, Skåne University Hospital, 205 02, Malmö, Sweden. 3. Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. 4. Centre for Community-based Health Research and Education (COHRE), Organization for the Promotion of Project Research, Shimane University, Izumo, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study is to examine whether there is an association between neighbourhood deprivation and incidence of congenital heart disease (CHD), after accounting for family- and individual-level potential confounders. METHODS: All children aged 0 to 11 years and living in Sweden (n = 748,951) were followed between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2010. Data were analysed by multilevel logistic regression, with family- and individual-level characteristics at the first level and level of neighbourhood deprivation at the second level. RESULTS: During the study period, among a total of 748,951 children, 1499 (0.2%) were hospitalised with CHD. Age-adjusted cumulative hospitalisation rates for CHD increased with increasing level of neighbourhood deprivation. In the study population, 1.8 per 1000 and 2.2 per 1000 children in the least and most deprived neighbourhoods, respectively, were hospitalised with CHD. The incidence of hospitalisation for CHD increased with increasing neighbourhood-level deprivation across all family and individual-level socio-demographic categories. The odds ratio (OR) for hospitalisation for CHD for those living in high-deprivation neighbourhoods versus those living in low-deprivation neighbourhoods was 1.23 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.04-1.46). In the full model, which took account for age, paternal and maternal individual-level socio-economic characteristics, comorbidities (e.g. maternal type 2 diabetes, OR = 3.03; maternal hypertension, OR = 2.01), and family history of CHD (OR = 3.27), the odds of CHD were slightly attenuated but did not remain significant in the most deprived neighbourhoods (OR = 1.20, 95% CI = 0.99-1.45, p = 0.057). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the largest so far on neighbourhood influences on CHD, and the results suggest that deprived neighbourhoods have higher rates of CHD, which represents important clinical knowledge. However, the association does not seem to be independent of individual- and family-level characteristics.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study is to examine whether there is an association between neighbourhood deprivation and incidence of congenital heart disease (CHD), after accounting for family- and individual-level potential confounders. METHODS: All children aged 0 to 11 years and living in Sweden (n = 748,951) were followed between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2010. Data were analysed by multilevel logistic regression, with family- and individual-level characteristics at the first level and level of neighbourhood deprivation at the second level. RESULTS: During the study period, among a total of 748,951 children, 1499 (0.2%) were hospitalised with CHD. Age-adjusted cumulative hospitalisation rates for CHD increased with increasing level of neighbourhood deprivation. In the study population, 1.8 per 1000 and 2.2 per 1000 children in the least and most deprived neighbourhoods, respectively, were hospitalised with CHD. The incidence of hospitalisation for CHD increased with increasing neighbourhood-level deprivation across all family and individual-level socio-demographic categories. The odds ratio (OR) for hospitalisation for CHD for those living in high-deprivation neighbourhoods versus those living in low-deprivation neighbourhoods was 1.23 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.04-1.46). In the full model, which took account for age, paternal and maternal individual-level socio-economic characteristics, comorbidities (e.g. maternal type 2 diabetes, OR = 3.03; maternal hypertension, OR = 2.01), and family history of CHD (OR = 3.27), the odds of CHD were slightly attenuated but did not remain significant in the most deprived neighbourhoods (OR = 1.20, 95% CI = 0.99-1.45, p = 0.057). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the largest so far on neighbourhood influences on CHD, and the results suggest that deprived neighbourhoods have higher rates of CHD, which represents important clinical knowledge. However, the association does not seem to be independent of individual- and family-level characteristics.
Authors: E van Doorslaer; A Wagstaff; H Bleichrodt; S Calonge; U G Gerdtham; M Gerfin; J Geurts; L Gross; U Häkkinen; R E Leu; O O'Donnell; C Propper; F Puffer; M Rodríguez; G Sundberg; O Winkelhake Journal: J Health Econ Date: 1997-02 Impact factor: 3.883
Authors: James L Mills; James Troendle; Mary R Conley; Tonia Carter; Charlotte M Druschel Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2010-04-07 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: K Bammann; W Gwozdz; A Lanfer; G Barba; S De Henauw; G Eiben; J M Fernandez-Alvira; E Kovács; L Lissner; L A Moreno; M Tornaritis; T Veidebaum; I Pigeot Journal: Pediatr Obes Date: 2012-08-08 Impact factor: 4.000
Authors: Philip J Lupo; Elaine Symanski; Peter H Langlois; Christina C Lawson; Sadia Malik; Suzanne M Gilboa; Laura J Lee; A J Agopian; Tania A Desrosiers; Martha A Waters; Paul A Romitti; Adolfo Correa; Gary M Shaw; Laura E Mitchell Journal: Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol Date: 2012-09-03
Authors: Shabnam Peyvandi; Rebecca J Baer; Christina D Chambers; Mary E Norton; Satish Rajagopal; Kelli K Ryckman; Anita Moon-Grady; Laura L Jelliffe-Pawlowski; Martina A Steurer Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2020-04-19 Impact factor: 5.501