Literature DB >> 25929298

Correlation between OCT-derived intrastent dimensions and fractional flow reserve measurements after coronary stent implantation and impact on clinical outcome.

Sebastian Reith1, Simone Battermann, Martin Hellmich, Nikolaus Marx, Mathias Burgmaier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Insufficient stent expansion, vessel wall injury, and tissue prolapse, all frequently unrecognized by coronary angiography, are predictors of future major adverse cardiac event (MACE) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) provides accurate visualization of these features of inadequate stent deployment, whereas reduced fractional flow reserve (FFR) values after PCI indicate functional significance of a residual intrastent stenosis.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship of OCT-derived intrastent lumen dimensions and FFR-derived hemodynamic relevance immediately after coronary stent implantation and to evaluate the clinical impact of these parameters at follow-up.
METHODS: In 66 stable patients with a coronary de novo lesion, treated by stent implantation, post-stenting FFR and OCT data were compared and related to MACE at follow-up.
RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between remaining OCT-derived intrastent percent area stenosis (%AS) and post-stent FFR (r² = 0.491; P<.001). According to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, both final FFR and intrastent %AS predicted MACE at 20 months (FFR: area under the curve [AUC] = 0.768; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.562-0.973; and optimal cut-off = 0.905; %AS: AUC = 0.807; 95%CI, 0.613-1.000; and optimal cut-off = 16.85%) with moderate diagnostic efficiency. Intrastent %AS (16.60 ± 4.75% vs 7.01 ± 3.49%; P<.001) and the 20-month cumulative incidence of MACE (35.9% vs 5.3%; P=.01) were significantly greater in patients with FFR ≤0.905 (n = 26; 39.4%) compared with FFR >0.905 (n = 40; 60.6%).
CONCLUSION: OCT-derived residual intrastent %AS is associated with decreased FFR following stent implantation and both are predictors for clinical outcome at follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25929298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol        ISSN: 1042-3931            Impact factor:   2.022


  7 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of imaging anatomy in predicting functional significance of coronary stenoses determined by fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Miao Chu; Neng Dai; Junqing Yang; Jelmer Westra; Shengxian Tu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  A Practical Approach to Assessing Stent Results with IVUS or OCT.

Authors:  Daisuke Hachinohe; Satoru Mitomo; Luciano Candilio; Azeem Latib
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

Review 3.  Impact of impaired fractional flow reserve after coronary interventions on outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mathias Wolfrum; Gregor Fahrni; Giovanni Luigi de Maria; Guido Knapp; Nick Curzen; Rajesh K Kharbanda; Georg M Fröhlich; Adrian P Banning
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  A randomized controlled trial of a physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention optimization strategy: Rationale and design of the TARGET FFR study.

Authors:  Damien Collison; John D McClure; Colin Berry; Keith G Oldroyd
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 5.  Physiologic Assessment after Coronary Stent Implantation.

Authors:  Doyeon Hwang; Seokhun Yang; Jinlong Zhang; Bon Kwon Koo
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 3.243

6.  Prognostic Implications of Fractional Flow Reserve After Coronary Stenting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Doyeon Hwang; Bon-Kwon Koo; Jinlong Zhang; Jiesuck Park; Seokhun Yang; Minsang Kim; Jun Pil Yun; Joo Myung Lee; Chang-Wook Nam; Eun-Seok Shin; Joon-Hyung Doh; Shao-Liang Chen; Tsunekazu Kakuta; Gabor G Toth; Zsolt Piroth; Nils P Johnson; Nico H J Pijls; Abdul Hakeem; Barry F Uretsky; Yohei Hokama; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Hong-Seok Lim; Tsuyoshi Ito; Akiko Matsuo; Lorenzo Azzalini; Massoud A Leesar; Tara Neleman; Nicolas M van Mieghem; Roberto Diletti; Joost Daemen; Damien Collison; Carlos Collet; Bernard De Bruyne
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-09-01

7.  Analysis of the clinical value of fractional flow reserve for prognosis evaluation of patients of percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Qingxia Zhao; Zheng Ji; Xia Li; Yali Di; Haojun An; Bin Wei; Liming Yang; Wensheng Chen
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.447

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.