James Allen Johnson1, Asal Mohamadi Johnson2. 1. 1Global Health Program, Rollins College, Winter Park, FL. 2. 2Department of Integrative Health Science, Stetson University, DeLand, FL.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A systematic literature review and subsequent meta-analysis were performed to investigate differences in childhood obesity between urban and rural areas in the United States. METHODS: A search of published studies comparing childhood obesity in urban and rural settings was undertaken by probing PubMed and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) for articles that met predetermined inclusion criteria. A subsequent meta-analysis was conducted to determine the combined effect size and significance of differences in childhood obesity between urban and rural areas. RESULTS: Ten studies were identified for systematic review, five of which contributed to the meta-analysis. All but one study suggested that residence in rural areas was associated with higher prevalence or increased odds of childhood obesity, compared to children living in urban areas. A meta-analysis of 74,168 pooled participants ages 2-19 found that rural children have 26% greater odds of obesity, compared to urban children (odds ratio=1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-1.32). CONCLUSIONS: Obesity rates are higher among rural children than urban children in the United States. To ensure successful targeted interventions and effective resource allocation, practitioners and policy makers alike should be cognizant of this disparity in childhood obesity.
BACKGROUND: A systematic literature review and subsequent meta-analysis were performed to investigate differences in childhood obesity between urban and rural areas in the United States. METHODS: A search of published studies comparing childhood obesity in urban and rural settings was undertaken by probing PubMed and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) for articles that met predetermined inclusion criteria. A subsequent meta-analysis was conducted to determine the combined effect size and significance of differences in childhood obesity between urban and rural areas. RESULTS: Ten studies were identified for systematic review, five of which contributed to the meta-analysis. All but one study suggested that residence in rural areas was associated with higher prevalence or increased odds of childhood obesity, compared to children living in urban areas. A meta-analysis of 74,168 pooled participants ages 2-19 found that rural children have 26% greater odds of obesity, compared to urban children (odds ratio=1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-1.32). CONCLUSIONS:Obesity rates are higher among rural children than urban children in the United States. To ensure successful targeted interventions and effective resource allocation, practitioners and policy makers alike should be cognizant of this disparity in childhood obesity.
Authors: Dominick J Lemas; Michelle I Cardel; Stephanie L Filipp; Jaclyn Hall; Rebecca Z Essner; Steven R Smith; Joseph Nadglowski; W Troy Donahoo; Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff; David R Nelson; William R Hogan; Elizabeth A Shenkman; Matthew J Gurka; David M Janicke Journal: Obes Res Clin Pract Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 2.288
Authors: Daniel R Taber; Jamie F Chriqui; Christopher M Quinn; Leah M Rimkus; Frank J Chaloupka Journal: Health Place Date: 2016-09-14 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Nicole Larson; Michael O'Connell; Cynthia S Davey; Caitlin Caspi; Martha Y Kubik; Marilyn S Nanney Journal: J Sch Health Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 2.118
Authors: Tarrah B Mitchell; David M Janicke; Ke Ding; Erin L Moorman; Molly C Basch; Crystal S Lim; Anne E Mathews Journal: J Pediatr Psychol Date: 2020-11-01