Tatyana E Fontenot1, Ahmad Deniwar1, Parisha Bhatia1, Zaid Al-Qurayshi2, Gregory W Randolph3, Emad Kandil4. 1. Department of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana. 2. School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana. 3. Division of Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts4Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mas. 4. Department of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana5Department of Otolaryngology, Tulane University School of Medicine. New Orleans, Louisiana.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Reoperation for recurrent papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) can be associated with a high rate of complications and failure to provide lasting remission. Percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) may be an effective nonsurgical management option for locally recurrent PTC. OBJECTIVE: This systematic analysis of the current literature compares the efficacy and complications related to PEI vs reoperative surgical intervention for treatment of locally recurrent PTC. DATA SOURCES: Original studies were identified using the keywords "thyroid/ethanol" and "recurrent thyroid cancer/repeat surgery." STUDY SELECTION: Studies evaluating reoperation or PEI for lymph node metastases in patients with primary surgery of total thyroidectomy with appropriate lymph node dissection where indicated were included in the analysis for both reoperation and PEI. Animal studies, single case reports, and studies with fewer than 10 lesions were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Outcomes included interval to detection of recurrence, success and failure rates, recurrence rates, complication rates, and follow-up duration. Between-group outcome differences were calculated using random-effects models, and pooled data cross-tabulation and logistic regression analysis were used. RESULTS: In all, 945 publications were identified, and 27 studies met the inclusion criteria. There were no studies that directly compared the 2 treatment techniques. A total of 1617 patients were included in this analysis; 168 (11.4%) were treated with PEI, and 1449 (88.6%) were treated with reoperation. Reoperation was successful in 94.8% of cases compared with an 87.5% success rate for PEI (odds ratio [OR], 2.58; 95% CI, 1.55-4.31; P < .001). The recurrence rates for PEI and reoperation at the site of the treated lesion or elsewhere in the neck were also similar (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.65-1.77; P = .78). Reoperation was associated with a 3.5% pooled risk of complications, while PEI incurred a pooled risk of 1.2% (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 0.72-12.3; P = .08). However, most studies did not report routine preoperative and postoperative laryngoscopies, an evaluation needed for accurate neural complication analysis associated with each procedure. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: High-quality, well-designed studies are needed to evaluate the feasibility of incorporating PEI into the treatment protocol of PTC. Although presently inferior to reoperation, PEI has the potential to be a widely accepted and effective nonsurgical treatment option for limited recurrent PTC in poor surgical candidates or patients seeking to avoid multiple reoperations.
IMPORTANCE: Reoperation for recurrent papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) can be associated with a high rate of complications and failure to provide lasting remission. Percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) may be an effective nonsurgical management option for locally recurrent PTC. OBJECTIVE: This systematic analysis of the current literature compares the efficacy and complications related to PEI vs reoperative surgical intervention for treatment of locally recurrent PTC. DATA SOURCES: Original studies were identified using the keywords "thyroid/ethanol" and "recurrent thyroid cancer/repeat surgery." STUDY SELECTION: Studies evaluating reoperation or PEI for lymph node metastases in patients with primary surgery of total thyroidectomy with appropriate lymph node dissection where indicated were included in the analysis for both reoperation and PEI. Animal studies, single case reports, and studies with fewer than 10 lesions were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Outcomes included interval to detection of recurrence, success and failure rates, recurrence rates, complication rates, and follow-up duration. Between-group outcome differences were calculated using random-effects models, and pooled data cross-tabulation and logistic regression analysis were used. RESULTS: In all, 945 publications were identified, and 27 studies met the inclusion criteria. There were no studies that directly compared the 2 treatment techniques. A total of 1617 patients were included in this analysis; 168 (11.4%) were treated with PEI, and 1449 (88.6%) were treated with reoperation. Reoperation was successful in 94.8% of cases compared with an 87.5% success rate for PEI (odds ratio [OR], 2.58; 95% CI, 1.55-4.31; P < .001). The recurrence rates for PEI and reoperation at the site of the treated lesion or elsewhere in the neck were also similar (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.65-1.77; P = .78). Reoperation was associated with a 3.5% pooled risk of complications, while PEI incurred a pooled risk of 1.2% (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 0.72-12.3; P = .08). However, most studies did not report routine preoperative and postoperative laryngoscopies, an evaluation needed for accurate neural complication analysis associated with each procedure. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: High-quality, well-designed studies are needed to evaluate the feasibility of incorporating PEI into the treatment protocol of PTC. Although presently inferior to reoperation, PEI has the potential to be a widely accepted and effective nonsurgical treatment option for limited recurrent PTC in poor surgical candidates or patients seeking to avoid multiple reoperations.
Authors: Soo Young Kim; Seok-Mo Kim; Hojin Chang; Bup-Woo Kim; Chi Young Lim; Yong Sang Lee; Hang-Seok Chang; Cheong Soo Park Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2017-06-29 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Ana P Kiess; Nishant Agrawal; James D Brierley; Umamaheswar Duvvuri; Robert L Ferris; Eric Genden; Richard J Wong; R Michael Tuttle; Nancy Y Lee; Gregory W Randolph Journal: Head Neck Date: 2015-12-30 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Carlos Gustavo Rivera-Robledo; David Velázquez-Fernández; Juan Pablo Pantoja; Mauricio Sierra; Bernardo Pérez-Enriquez; Raul Rivera-Moscoso; Mónica Chapa; Miguel F Herrera Journal: World J Surg Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Nathan Y Yu; Aditya Khurana; Daniel J Ma; Michelle A Neben-Wittich; Michael A Golafshar; Lisa A McGee; Jean-Claude M Rwigema; Robert L Foote; Samir H Patel Journal: Int J Part Ther Date: 2021-06-25