| Literature DB >> 25927715 |
Muzdalifat Abeid1,2, Projestine Muganyizi3,4, Siriel Massawe5, Rose Mpembeni6, Elisabeth Darj7,8, Pia Axemo9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Violence against women and children is globally recognized as a social and human rights concern. In Tanzania, sexual violence towards women and children is a public health problem. The aim of this study was to determine community knowledge of and attitudes towards rape and child sexual abuse, and assess associations between knowledge and attitudes and socio-demographic characteristics.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25927715 PMCID: PMC4419483 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-1757-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Measurement of knowledge and attitudes toward sexual violence
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Knowledge | |
| (1) Causes of sexual violence | The total score was 25. Respondents with score 0-66% was labeled as having poor knowledge on sexual violence and coded as 0, and all those who score 67-100% labeled as having good knowledge on sexual violence and coded as 1. |
| - Effects of alcohol/illicit drugs | |
| - Effects of pornographic films | |
| - Changes in our culture | |
| (2) Consequences of sexual violence | |
| - Health and physical effects | |
| - Mental and psychological effects | |
| - Reproductive health effects | |
| - Long term effect on the victim’s development | |
| (3) Perpetrators of sexual violence | |
| - Not known | |
| - Strangers in the community | |
| - Close friends | |
| - Close relatives | |
| (4) Sexual offense Special Provision Act (SOSPA) for Tanzania | |
| - Number of years of imprisonment for perpetrators | |
| (5) Expected services at the health facility | |
| - Contraception, HIV/AIDS prophylaxis, STI treatment, wound care, psychotherapy,legal verification | |
| Attitudes favoring male dominance | The maximum score for all 14 statements is 28. Respondent not believing in most of the statements and scored 21–28 was labeled as |
| (1) A man should show he is head of household | |
| (2) A decent wife obeys his husband | |
| (3) A wife is obliged to have sex with her husband | |
| (4) Marital disputes should not be exposed outside | |
| (5) Husband disciplines the wife by beating her | |
| Opinions on justifying husband beating his wife | |
| (1) Reason to hit: wife does not fulfill household duties | |
| (2) Reason to hit: wife refuses sex | |
| (3) Reason to hit: wife opposes his views/opinions | |
| (4) Reason to hit: wife is unfaithful | |
| (5) Reason to hit: wife is alcohol/drug abuse | |
| (6) Reason to hit: wife insults/disrespect | |
| Rape Myths | |
| (1) Reason women and girls are raped: the way they dress or act | |
| (2) Reason women and girls are raped: the place they work (bar, clubs, prostitute) | |
| (3) Reason women and girls are raped: they walk alone at night |
Socio-demographic characteristics of respondents
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
| 915 | 58.4 |
| Female | 653 | 41.6 |
| Male | ||
|
| ||
| 15 – 24 | 410 | 26.1 |
| 25 – 34 | 595 | 37.9 |
| 35 – 49 | 563 | 35.9 |
|
| ||
| No formal education | 142 | 9.1 |
| Primary Education | 1,308 | 83.4 |
| Secondary Education and above | 118 | 7.5 |
|
| ||
| Married/cohabiting | 969 | 62.2 |
| Single | 444 | 27.7 |
| Divorced/separated/widowed | 155 | 10.1 |
|
| ||
| Student | 56 | 3.6 |
| Salaried employed | 36 | 2.3 |
| Self-employed | 76 | 4.8 |
| Peasant/farmer | 1,370 | 87.4 |
| Others | 30 | 1.9 |
|
| ||
| Yes | 1,211 | 77.2 |
| No | 357 | 22.8 |
Descriptive statistics of knowledge towards sexual violence among respondents of rural Morogoro
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| <0.001 | |||
| Female | 915 | 382 (41.7%) | 533 (58.3%) | |
| Male | 653 | 339 (51.9%) | 314 (48.1%) | |
|
| 0.063 | |||
| 15 – 24 | 410 | 177 (43.2%) | 233 (56.8%) | |
| 25 – 34 | 595 | 263 (44.2%) | 332 (55.8%) | |
| 35 – 49 | 563 | 281 (49.9%) | 282 (50.1%) | |
|
| <0.001 | |||
| No formal Education | 142 | 44 (31.0%) | 98 (69.0%) | |
| Primary Education | 1,308 | 608 (46.5%) | 700 (53.5%) | |
| Secondary Education and above | 118 | 69 (58.5%) | 49 (41.0%) | |
|
| 0.007 | |||
| Married/cohabiting | 969 | 467 (48.2%) | 502 (51.8%) | |
| Single | 444 | 200 (45.0%) | 244 (55.0%) | |
| Divorced/separated/widowed | 155 | 54 (34.8%) | 101 (65.2%) | |
|
| 0.168 | |||
| Unemployed | 1,456 | 662 (45.5%) | 794 (54.5%) | |
| Employed | 112 | 59 (52.7%) | 53 (47.3%) | |
|
| 0.040 | |||
| Yes | 1,211 | 574 (47.4%) | 637 (52.6%) | |
| No | 357 | 147 (41.2%) | 210 (58.8%) | |
Figure 1Gender analysis of knowledge on sexual violence. Percentage of all women and men aged 18–49 who do not know about the circumstances that influence sexual violence, the consequences of sexual violence, the perpetrators of violence, the sexual offence special provision act (SOSPA), and the medical treatment of sexual violence.
Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis of knowledge on sexual violence among respondents of rural Morogoro
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Female | 915 | 382 (41.7%) | Ref | Ref | ||
| Male | 653 | 339 (51.9%) | 1.5 | (1.2-1.8) | 1.3 | (1.1-1.6) |
|
| ||||||
| 15 – 24 | 410 | 177 (43.2%) | Ref | Ref | ||
| 25 – 34 | 595 | 263 (44.2%) | 1.0 | (0.8-1.3) | 1.1 | (0.8-1.4) |
| 35 – 49 | 563 | 281 (49.9%) | 1.3 | (1.0-1.7) | 1.4 | (1.0-1.8) |
|
| ||||||
| No formal Education | 142 | 44 (31.0%) | Ref | Ref | ||
| Primary Education | 1,308 | 608 (46.5%) | 1.9 | (1.3-2.8) | 1.8 | (1.2-2.6) |
| Secondary Education and above | 118 | 69 (58.5%) | 3.1 | (1.9-5.2) | 3.1 | (1.8-5.3) |
|
| ||||||
| Divorced/separated/widow | 155 | 54 (34.8%) | Ref | Ref | ||
| Married/cohabiting | 969 | 467 (48.2%) | 1.7 | (1.2-2.5) | 1.6 | (1.1-2.2) |
| Single | 444 | 200 (45.0%) | 1.5 | (1.0-2.2) | 1.3 | (0.9-2.0) |
|
| ||||||
| Unemployed | 1,456 | 662 (45.5%) | Ref | Ref | ||
| Employed | 112 | 59 (52.7%) | 1.3 | (0.9-2.0) | 1.2 | (0.8-1.8) |
|
| ||||||
| No | 357 | 147 (41.2%) | Ref | Ref | ||
| Yes | 1,211 | 574 (47.4%) | 1.3 | (1.0-1.6) | 1.2 | (0.9-1.5) |
OR - Odds Ratio.
*Bivariate logistic regression.
**Multiple logistic regression: age, sex, education, marital status, occupation and radio ownership were included.
Descriptive statistics of acceptance of sexual violence among respondents of rural Morogoro
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| <0.001 | |||
| Female | 915 | 331 (36.2%) | 584 (63.8%) | |
| Male | 653 | 328 (50.2%) | 325 (49.8%) | |
|
| 0.164 | |||
| 15 – 24 | 410 | 162 (39.5%) | 248 (60.5%) | |
| 25 – 34 | 595 | 243 (40.8%) | 352 (59.2%) | |
| 35 – 49 | 563 | 254 (45.1%) | 309 (54.9%) | |
|
| <0.001 | |||
| No formal Education | 142 | 46 (32.4%) | 96 (67.6%) | |
| Primary Education | 1,308 | 542 (41.4%) | 766 (58.6%) | |
| Secondary Education and above | 118 | 71 (60.2%) | 47 (39.8%) | |
|
| < 0.001 | |||
| Married/cohabiting | 969 | 358 (36.9%) | 611 (63.1%) | |
| Single | 444 | 229 (51.6%) | 215 (48.4%) | |
| Divorced/separated/widowed | 155 | 72 (46.5%) | 83 (53.5%) | |
|
| 0.037 | |||
| Unemployed | 1,456 | 601 (41.3%) | 855 (58.7%) | |
| Employed | 112 | 58 (51.8%) | 54 (48.2%) | |
|
| 0.010 | |||
| Yes | 1,211 | 530 (43.8%) | 681 (56.2%) | |
| No | 357 | 129 (36.1%) | 228 (63.9%) | |
Figure 2Gender analysis of attitude towards sexual violence. Percentage of all women and men aged 18–49 who believed that a husband is justified in beating his wife for the reasons given, who also endorsed the rape myths, and favored male dominance.
Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis of attitude towards sexual violence among respondents of rural Morogoro
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Female | 915 | 331 (36.2%) | Ref | Ref | ||
| Male | 653 | 328 (50.2%) | 1.8 | (1.5-2.2) | 1.7 | (1.4-2.1) |
|
| ||||||
| 15 – 24 | 410 | 162 (39.5%) | Ref | Ref | ||
| 25 – 34 | 595 | 243 (40.8%) | 1.1 | (0.8-1.4) | 1.3 | (1.0-1.7) |
| 35 – 49 | 563 | 254 (45.1%) | 1.3 | (1.0-1.6) | 1.5 | (1.2-2.1) |
|
| ||||||
| No formal Education | 142 | 46 (32.4%) | Ref | Ref | ||
| Primary Education | 1,308 | 542 (41.4%) | 1.5 | (1.0-2.1) | 1.3 | (0.9-2.0) |
| Secondary Education and above | 118 | 71 (60.2%) | 3.2 | (1.9-5.2) | 2.3 | (1.3-4.0) |
|
| ||||||
| Married/cohabiting | 969 | 358 (36.9%) | Ref | Ref | ||
| Single | 444 | 229 (51.6%) | 1.8 | (1.4-2.3) | 1.8 | (1.4-2.3) |
| Divorced/separated/widow | 155 | 72 (46.5%) | 1.5 | (1.1-2.1) | 1.8 | (1.3-2.6) |
|
| ||||||
| Unemployed | 1,456 | 601 (41.3%) | Ref | Ref | ||
| Employed | 112 | 58 (51.8%) | 1.5 | (1.0-2.2) | 1.3 | (0.9-1.9) |
|
| ||||||
| No | 357 | 129 (36.1%) | Ref | Ref | ||
| Yes | 1,211 | 530 (43.8%) | 1.4 | (1.1-1.8) | 1.3 | (1.0-1.7) |
OR - Odds Ratio.
*Bivariate logistic regression.
**Multiple logistic regression, age, sex, education, marital status, occupation and radio ownership were included.