| Literature DB >> 25926815 |
Stephen A Wood1, Maya Almaraz2, Mark A Bradford3, Krista L McGuire4, Shahid Naeem5, Christopher Neill6, Cheryl A Palm7, Katherine L Tully8, Jizhong Zhou9.
Abstract
Tropical smallholder agriculture is undergoing rapid transformation in nutrient cycling pathways as international development efforts strongly promote greater use of mineral fertilizers to increase crop yields. These changes in nutrient availability may alter the composition of microbial communities with consequences for rates of biogeochemical processes that control nutrient losses to the environment. Ecological theory suggests that altered microbial diversity will strongly influence processes performed by relatively few microbial taxa, such as denitrification and hence nitrogen losses asEntities:
Keywords: GeoChip; carbon mineralization; denitrification; fertilization; microbial diversity; smallholder agriculture; tropics
Year: 2015 PMID: 25926815 PMCID: PMC4396515 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00090
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Means and SD for variables included in structural equation models among the three categories of nutrient addition: low fertilizer, high fertilizer, and agroforestry.
| Farm type | Denitrification | C mineralization | Taxonomic diversity | Functional diversity | Sand | Silt | Clay | pH | C | N | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H’ | |||||||||||
| Low fertilizer | 0.61 | 1.04 | 10.02 | 8.88 | 53.76 | 14.40 | 31.74 | 5.41 | 1.83 | 0.20 | 16.63 |
| High fertilizer | 0.48 | 0.99 | 9.78 | 8.99 | 56.00 | 9.71 | 34.15 | 5.06 | 1.95 | 0.22 | 19.13 |
| Agroforestry | 1.00 | 1.27 | 9.79 | 9.05 | 58.58 | 10.46 | 30.86 | 5.47 | 1.72 | 0.18 | 7.00 |
Model results and goodness of fit statistics for structural equation models.
| Denitrification | C Mineralization | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denitrification∼ | C mineralization∼ | ||||||||
| Agroforestry | 0.63 | 0.00 | Agroforestry | 0.47 | 0.00 | ||||
| Functional diversity | -0.18 | 0.31 | Functional diversity | -0.08 | 0.72 | ||||
| N addition | -0.33 | 0.10 | N addition | -0.01 | 0.95 | ||||
| Taxonomic diversity | -0.24 | 0.18 | Taxonomic diversity | -0.23 | 0.35 | ||||
| Taxonomic diversity∼ | Taxonomic diversity∼ | ||||||||
| N Addition | -0.35 | 0.06 | N Addition | -0.31 | 0.18 | ||||
| pH | -0.41 | 0.00 | pH | -0.40 | 0.01 | ||||
| Functional diversity∼ | Functional diversity∼ | ||||||||
| Agroforestry | 0.50 | 0.01 | Agroforestry | 0.48 | 0.03 | ||||
| 21 | 21 | ||||||||
| 5 | 5 | ||||||||
| χ2 | 2.14 | χ2 | 2.62 | ||||||
| Pχ2 | 0.83 | Pχ2 | 0.76 | ||||||
| RMSEA | 0.00 | RMSEA | 0.00 | ||||||
| P RMSEA | 0.85 | PRMSEA | 0.75 | ||||||