Literature DB >> 25926672

Re-engineering shared decision-making.

Muriel R Gillick.   

Abstract

Shared decision-making is widely accepted as the gold standard of clinical care. Numerous obstacles to achieving shared decision-making have been identified, including patient factors, physician factors and systemic factors. Until now, the paradigm is seldom successfully implemented in clinical practice, raising questions about the practicality of the process recommended for its use. A re-engineered model is proposed in which physicians elicit and prioritise patients' goals of care and then help translate those goals into treatment options, after clarifying the patient's underlying health status. Preliminary evidence suggests that each step of this revised process is feasible and that patients and physicians are comfortable with this strategy. Adoption of this model, after further testing, would allow the goal of shared decision-making to be realised. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autonomy; Decision-making; Paternalism

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25926672     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  9 in total

1.  Mammography decision making: Trends and predictors of provider communication in the Health Information National Trends Survey, 2011 to 2014.

Authors:  Laura M Spring; Megan R Marshall; Erica T Warner
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Comparison of Goals of Care Between Hemodialysis Patients and Their Health Care Providers: A Survey.

Authors:  Ariel Lefkowitz; Blair Henry; Jennifer Bottoms; Jeffery Myers; David M J Naimark
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2016-11-24

3.  Key components of shared decision making models: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hanna Bomhof-Roordink; Fania R Gärtner; Anne M Stiggelbout; Arwen H Pieterse
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Patient values informing medical treatment: a pilot community and advance care planning survey.

Authors:  S Milnes; C Corke; N R Orford; M Bailey; J Savulescu; D Wilkinson
Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 3.568

5.  Evaluation of the Use of Shared Decision Making in Breast Cancer: International Survey.

Authors:  Marta Maes-Carballo; Manuel Martín-Díaz; Luciano Mignini; Khalid Saeed Khan; Rubén Trigueros; Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Shared Decision-making in Urologic Practice: Results From the 2019 AUA Census.

Authors:  Giulia Ippolito Lane; Chad Ellimoottil; Lauren Wallner; William Meeks; Rachel Mbassa; James Quentin Clemens
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 7.  Shared decision-making for older adults with cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Warren D Backman; Sharon A Levine; Nanette K Wenger; John Gordon Harold
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 2.882

8.  Drug prescription goals in primary care: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Louis Bernard; René Ecochard; François Gueyffier; Laurent Letrilliart
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 9.  Shared decision making in breast cancer treatment guidelines: Development of a quality assessment tool and a systematic review.

Authors:  Marta Maes-Carballo; Isabel Muñoz-Núñez; Manuel Martín-Díaz; Luciano Mignini; Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas; Khalid Saeed Khan
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 3.377

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.