Literature DB >> 25926088

Comparison of Effects of Low- versus High-Dose Heparin on Access-Site Complications during Transradial Coronary Angiography: A Double-Blind Randomized Study.

Aleks Degirmencioglu1, Ali Buturak, Ertugrul Zencirci, Gultekin Karakus, Tolga Sinan Güvenc, Ahmet Akyol, Aycan Esen, Yasemin Demirci, Ilke Sipahi, Sinan Dagdelen, Tugrul Norgaz, Sevket Gorgulu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Although heparin is highly effective in reducing the rate of radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization, the optimal heparin dose is still controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two different heparin doses during transradial coronary angiography.
METHODS: 490 consecutive patients undergoing transradial coronary angiography were prospectively enrolled into this double-blind randomized trial. A total of 202 patients enrolled in the low-dose (LD; 2,500 U of heparin) group and 202 patients enrolled in the high-dose (HD; 5,000 U of heparin) group were included in the final analysis. The primary endpoint of the study was radial artery occlusion. Bleeding and hematomas were the secondary outcome measures.
RESULTS: At day 7, radial artery occlusion occurred in 5.9% of the patients in the LD group and in 5.4% of the patients in the HD group (p = 0.83). Bleeding during deflation of the transradial band occurred in 6.4% of the patients in the LD group and in 18.3% of the patients in the HD group; the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Higher-dose heparin was found to be an independent predictor of bleeding (p = 0.007).
CONCLUSION: A lower dose of heparin (i.e. 2,500 U) decreases bleeding during transradial band deflation without an increase in radial artery occlusion.
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25926088     DOI: 10.1159/000377621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiology        ISSN: 0008-6312            Impact factor:   1.869


  4 in total

1.  Transradial approach for coronary angiogram: something not to be neglected.

Authors:  Surender Deora; Sanjay Shah; Tejas Patel
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2015-07-30

2.  The Open (Radial) Artery Hypothesis: How We Can Preserve a Better Arterial Access Site.

Authors:  Amit N Vora; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  Cardiology       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 1.869

Review 3.  Radial Artery and Ulnar Artery Occlusions Following Coronary Procedures and the Impact of Anticoagulation: ARTEMIS (Radial and Ulnar ARTEry Occlusion Meta-AnalysIS) Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  George Hahalis; Konstantinos Aznaouridis; Gregory Tsigkas; Periklis Davlouros; Ioanna Xanthopoulou; Nikolaos Koutsogiannis; Ioanna Koniari; Marianna Leopoulou; Olivier Costerousse; Dimitris Tousoulis; Olivier F Bertrand
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  Different dose of heparin in preventing radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary angiography: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ling Zhao; Yanlei Pang; Huijing Zhang; Yong Li; Qun Zheng; Fengde Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 1.889

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.