Literature DB >> 25925905

Individual variations in ankle brachial index measurement among Turkish adults.

Orhan Demir1, Ilker Tasci2, Cengizhan Acikel3, Kenan Saglam1, Mustafa Gezer1, Ramazan Acar1, Birol Yildiz1, Fatih Bulucu1, Hasan Kutsi Kabul4, Mustafa Inanc Dogan1, Bayram Koc1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Variability of ankle brachial index (ABI) measured by the same observer in the same individual on three different occasions was examined. BASIC
METHODS: A single morning ABI was initially determined (measurement 1) with handheld Doppler device. One to four weeks apart, another morning (measurement 2) and afternoon (measurement 3) ABI was measured on the same day. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: A total of 161 adults were enrolled. Mean ABI was similar among the three measurements. ABI differed more than ≥0.15 in 15 individuals between measurement 1 and 3, in 10 subjects between measurement 1 and 2, and in 12 individuals between measurement 2 and 3. Intra-group correlation coefficients of reproducibility of ABI were 0.808 for single measurements (coefficient of the values lacking association with each other), and 0.927 for average measurements (coefficient of the values that were associated with each other).
CONCLUSIONS: Although reproducibility of ABI values was found satisfactory, up to 12% of participants displayed more than 0.15 alternations between measurements, either on the same day or more than a week apart.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Peripheral arterial disease; ankle-brachial index; reproducibility; variation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25925905     DOI: 10.1177/1708538115584506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vascular        ISSN: 1708-5381            Impact factor:   1.285


  3 in total

1.  Association between ankle brachial index and development of postoperative intensive care unit delirium in patients with peripheral arterial disease.

Authors:  Jihee Kang; Ji Hyun An; Hong Jin Jeon; Yang Jin Park
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  The ankle brachial index in people with and without diabetes: intra-tester reliability.

Authors:  Sarah Louise Casey; Sean Michael Lanting; Vivienne Helaine Chuter
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  The reliability of the ankle brachial index: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah Casey; Sean Lanting; Christopher Oldmeadow; Vivienne Chuter
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 2.303

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.