| Literature DB >> 25925864 |
Md Ashraf Ali1,2, Mir Imam Ibne Wahed3, Naznin Ara Khatune4, Bytul Mokaddesur Rahman5, Ranjan Kumar Barman6, Md Rafiqul Islam7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus is a global health problem and constantly increasing day by day. The number of diabetic people in world is expected to rise to 366 million in 2030. The available drugs for diabetes, insulin or oral hypoglycemic agents have one or more side effects and search for new antidiabetic drugs with minimal or no side effects from medicinal plants is a challenging for us. The present study was undertaken to investigate the antidiabetic and antioxidant activity of Semecarpus anacardium (Linn.) (abbreviated as SF).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25925864 PMCID: PMC4436845 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-015-0662-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Survival rate of animals after 15 days of treatment with SA extract
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal control (NC) | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100 |
| Diabetic Control (DC) | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40 |
| Diabetic standard (DS) | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100 ** |
| SA 100 (100 mg/kg) | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60 * |
| SA 200 (200 mg/kg) | 5 | 4 | 1 | 80 * |
| SA 400 (400 mg/kg) | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100 ** |
Data expressed in percentages (%). (n = 5). (p < 0.001) Control group received 0.5% methyl cellulose and standard group received 150 mg/kg Metformin.
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared with diabetic control.
Figure 1Time course of changes in blood sugar levels in the treatment period of 15 days. Data expressed in Mean ± Standard Error. (n = 5). Control group received 0.5% MC and standard group received 150 mg/kg Metformin, *p < 0.05 compared with diabetic control.
Effect of SA extract on body weight changes in normal and diabetic rats
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | 174.2 ± 6.5 | 176.5 ± 4.23 | 178.4 ± 2.25 | 180.2 ± 4.32 | 183.8 ± 3.56 | 186.4 ± 5.78 |
| DC | 166.4 ± 3.9 | 167.4 ± 4.0 | 168.6 ± 4.2 | 170.4 ± 3.7 | 174.8 ± 3.8 | 175.0 ± 4.4 |
| DS | 156.6 ± 4.5 | 157.6 ± 4.2 | 157.8 ± 4.4 | 159.4 ± 5.7 | 163.1 ± 4.5 | 157.4 ± 3.2 |
| SA 100 | 156.6 ± 4.4 | 152.8 ± 5.3 | 150.8 ± 7.5 | 150.4 ± 8.3 | 147.8 ± 9.4 | 146.2 ± 9.5 |
| SA 200 | 153.4 ± 5.6 | 153.75 ± 4.6 | 154.51 ± 8.5 | 156.7 ± 3.3 | 163.5 ± 5.6 | 166.6 ± 6.0 |
| SA 400 | 157.2 ± 6.5 | 158.2 ± 7.5 | 159.5 ± 5.3 | 161.5 ± 6.8 | 170.6 ± 3.4 | 172.4 ± 3.7 |
Data expressed in Mean ± Standard Error. (n = 5). Control group received 0.5% methyl cellulose and standard group received 150 mg/kg Metformin.
Effect of SA extract on organ weight in alloxan diabetic rats (gm)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | 0.62 ± 0.05 | 4.87 ± 0.25 | 1.1 ± 0.06 | 0.38 ± 0.02 | 1.15 ± 0.07 |
| DC | 0.51 ± 0.04 | 3.35 ± 0.4 | 1.08 ± 0.0 | 0.39 ± 0.1 | 1.15 ± 0.5 |
| DS | 0.49 ± 0.03 | 4.32 ± 0.23* | 0.98 ± 0 | 0.47 ± 0.04 | 1.35 ± 0.13 |
| SA 100 | 0.54 ± 0.08 | 4.13 ± 0.33 | 0.97 ± 0.05 | 0.41 ± 0.41 | 1.27 ± 0.12 |
| SA 200 | 0.52 ± 0.03 | 5.25 ± 0.3* | 1.05 ± 0.06 | 0.52 ± 0.04 | 1.17 ± 0.2 |
| SA 400 | 0.55 ± 0.16 | 5.47 ± 0.08* | 1.05 ± 0.02 | 0.53 ± 0.07 | 1.29 ± 0.22 |
Data expressed in Mean ± Standard Error. (n = 5). *p < 0.05 compared with diabetic control.
Effect of SA extract on lipid profile in normal and diabetic rats (mg/dl)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | 168.5 ± 4.8 | 140 ± 2.1 | 110 ± 3.7 | 43 ± 1.4 |
| DC | 210 ± 3.4†† | 182 ± 3.9†† | 132 ± 4.2† | 25 ± 3.0† |
| DS | 155.5 ± 4.2** | 135 ± 5.3** | 105 ± 3.2* | 40 ± 2.8* |
| SA 100 | 182 ± 4.6* | 175 ± 2.6 | 125 ± 3.1 | 28 ± 1.7 |
| SA 200 | 178 ± 3.8* | 165 ± 4.3 | 121 ± 5.3 | 31 ± 2.1 |
| SA 400 | 170 ± 5.6** | 150 ± 2.8** | 115 ± 2.5* | 37 ± 1.9* |
Data expressed in Mean ± Standard Error. (n = 5). *p < 0.05, and **p < 0.01 compared with diabetic control, †p < 0.05 and †† p < 0.01 compared with normal control.
Figure 2Effect of SA extract on liver glycogen content in normal and diabetic rats. Data expressed in Mean ± Standard Error. (n = 5). *p < 0.05 compared with diabetic control.
Effect of SA extract on SGOT and SGPT levels in alloxan diabetic rats
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Normal Control (NC) | 18 ± 4.02 | 21.5 ± 0.39 |
| Diabetic Control (DC) | 38 ± 2.83† | 42.6 ± 0.6† |
| Standard (DS) | 20.5 ± 3.07* | 22.2 ± 0.51* |
| SA 100 (100 mg/kg) | 27.0 ± 2.14* | 29.3 ± 0.14* |
| SA 200 (200 mg/kg) | 24.7 ± 3.5* | 25.8 ± 0.32* |
| SA 400 (400 mg/kg) | 22.4 ± 2.65* | 23.1 ± 0.26* |
Data expressed in Mean ± Standard Error. (n = 5). *p < 0.05 compared with diabetic control, †p < 0.05 compared with normal control.
Effects of bark extract on Hb (%) and RBC
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Normal Control (NC) | 13.3 ± 0.8 | 5.2 ± 0.1 |
| Diabetic Control (DC) | 12.6 ± 0.5 | 5.2 ± 0.1 |
| Standard (DS) | 12.5 ± 0.5 | 5.4 ± 0.04 |
| SA 100 (100 mg/kg) | 11.5 ± 0.5 | 4.8 ± 0.1 |
| SA 200 (200 mg/kg) | 10.4 ± 0.3† | 4.8 ± 0.1† |
| SA 400 (400 mg/kg) | 9.6 ± 0.6†* | 4.7 ± 0.1* |
Data expressed in Mean ± Standard Error. (n = 5). *p < 0.05 compared with diabetic control, †p < 0.05 compared with normal control.
Figure 3DPPH free radical scavenging activity (%) at various concentrations (μg/mL) of SA barks extract and ascorbic acid.
Phytochemical test results of stem bark extract
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EE of | + | - | + | + | + | + | + |
EE: Ethanol-Extract; Sign (+) indicates present and sign (−) indicates absent.
Figure 4Total phenol and flavonoid content of SA extract represented as equivalent of gallic acid and quercetin respectively. Each values represented as means ± SE (n = 3).