| Literature DB >> 25925682 |
Patrick J Hanley1, Jan J Melenhorst2, Sarah Nikiforow3, Phillip Scheinberg2, James W Blaney4, Gail Demmler-Harrison5, C Russell Cruz6, Sharon Lam1, Robert A Krance7, Kathryn S Leung8, Caridad A Martinez8, Hao Liu4, Daniel C Douek9, Helen E Heslop7, Cliona M Rooney10, Elizabeth J Shpall11, A John Barrett2, John R Rodgers12, Catherine M Bollard13.
Abstract
Adoptive transfer of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific T cells derived from adult seropositive donors can effectively restore antiviral immunity after transplantation. However, CMV-seronegative donors lack CMV-specific memory T cells, which restricts the availability of virus-specific T cells for immunoprophylaxis. We demonstrate the feasibility of deriving CMV-specific T cells from naïve cells for T cell therapy. Naïve T cells primed to recognize CMV were restricted to different, atypical epitopes than T cells derived from CMV-seropositive individuals; however, these two cell populations had similar avidities. CMV-seropositive individuals also had T cells recognizing these atypical epitopes, but these cells had a lower avidity than those derived from the seronegative subjects, which suggests that high-avidity T cells to these epitopes may be lost over time. Indeed, recipients of cord blood (CB) grafts who did not develop CMV were found by clonotypic analysis to have T cells recognizing atypical CMVpp65 epitopes. Therefore, we examined unmanipulated CB units and found that T cells with T cell receptors restricted by atypical epitopes were the most common, which may explain why these T cells expanded. When infused to recipients, naïve donor-derived virus-specific T cells that recognized atypical epitopes were associated with prolonged periods of CMV-free survival and complete remission. These data suggest that naïve-derived T cells from seronegative patients may be an additional source of cells for CMV immunoprophylaxis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25925682 PMCID: PMC4479400 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa2546
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Transl Med ISSN: 1946-6234 Impact factor: 17.956