Class-I TCP transcription factors are plant-specific developmental regulators. In this study, the role of one such rice gene, OsTCP19, in water-deficit and salt stress response was explored. Besides a general upregulation by abiotic stresses, this transcript was more abundant in tolerant than sensitive rice genotypes during early hours of stress. Stress, tissue and genotype-dependent retention of a small in-frame intron in this transcript was also observed. Overexpression of OsTCP19 in Arabidopsis caused upregulation of IAA3, ABI3 and ABI4 and downregulation of LOX2, and led to developmental abnormalities like fewer lateral root formation. Moreover, decrease in water loss and reactive oxygen species, and hyperaccumulation of lipid droplets in the transgenics contributed to better stress tolerance both during seedling establishment and in mature plants. OsTCP19 was also shown to directly regulate a rice triacylglycerol biosynthesis gene in transient assays. Genes similar to those up- or downregulated in the transgenics were accordingly found to coexpress positively and negatively with OsTCP19 in Rice Oligonucleotide Array Database. Interactions of OsTCP19 with OsABI4 and OsULT1 further suggest its function in modulation of abscisic acid pathways and chromatin structure. Thus, OsTCP19 appears to be an important node in cell signaling which crosslinks stress and developmental pathways.
Class-I TCP transcription factors are plant-specific developmental regulators. In this study, the role of one such rice gene, OsTCP19, in water-deficit and salt stress response was explored. Besides a general upregulation by abiotic stresses, this transcript was more abundant in tolerant than sensitive rice genotypes during early hours of stress. Stress, tissue and genotype-dependent retention of a small in-frame intron in this transcript was also observed. Overexpression of OsTCP19 in Arabidopsis caused upregulation of IAA3, ABI3 and ABI4 and downregulation of LOX2, and led to developmental abnormalities like fewer lateral root formation. Moreover, decrease in water loss and reactive oxygen species, and hyperaccumulation of lipid droplets in the transgenics contributed to better stress tolerance both during seedling establishment and in mature plants. OsTCP19 was also shown to directly regulate a ricetriacylglycerol biosynthesis gene in transient assays. Genes similar to those up- or downregulated in the transgenics were accordingly found to coexpress positively and negatively with OsTCP19 in RiceOligonucleotide Array Database. Interactions of OsTCP19 with OsABI4 and OsULT1 further suggest its function in modulation of abscisic acid pathways and chromatin structure. Thus, OsTCP19 appears to be an important node in cell signaling which crosslinks stress and developmental pathways.
Teosinte branched1, Cycloidea, Proliferating cell factor
(TCP)-domain proteins are plant specific regulators of growth and organ patterning.
These are basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors (TFs) but do not bind to
E-Box DNA sequence. Sequence divergence in the TCP-domain of these non-conventional bHLH
proteins further divides them into Class-I and -II TCP TFs, manifests position specific
preferences for certain bases in their otherwise similar DNA-binding sequence and allows
dimerization more freely between members of the same class12. The
abundance of Class-I and -II TCP DNA-binding element in promoter of contrasting groups
of genes creates functional antagonism between these two groups of proteins. While
Class-I TCP TFs generally promote cell division and proliferation, and support the
growth of organs and tissues, Class-II TCP proteins are known to function
oppositely3. Also, owing to overlapping expression pattern and
function of various Class-I TCP TFs, the phenotypes of their overexpression as well as
mutant lines are mostly feeble or undetectable45.In a wide variety of plants, TCP TFs regulate different developmental aspects through
their effect on similar molecular pathways that include cytokinin, auxin, jasmonic acid
(JA) and strigolactone6. These proteins also function by interacting with
other TFs57 and regulate gene expression by recruiting chromatin
modifiers like BRAHMA (BRM)8. TCP-regulated phenotypes include leaf
shape, branch pattern, epidermal cell differentiation and floral structure and
patterning6. TCP proteins have also been shown to integrate external
signals into developmental pathways as exemplified by dark-responsive mesocotyl
elongation in rice9.The intrinsic developmental program of plants always remains knotted to external cues and
is severely affected by abiotic stress conditions. Plants have developed mechanisms to
withstand such harsh conditions by activating enzymes, transcription regulators and
other factors that operate in pathways governed by hormones like abscisic acid (ABA) and
second messengers like Ca2+. Interestingly, knockdown of a subset of
Class-II TCP TFs by overexpression of mir319 increases tolerance to dehydration
and salinity stress in bentgrass10. Moreover,
Ca2+-triggered signaling in Arabidopsis is known to activate genes
through CAMTA-, DREB-, ABRE- and Class-I TCP-like factor binding sites in their promoter
regions11. Mutation disrupting the function of MSI1 (a
transcriptional repressor), not only induces stress and ABA-responsive genes but also
upregulates two Class-I TCP and a subset of Class-I TCP-regulated genes12. These reports do indicate a possible relation between pathways regulated by abiotic
stress and ABA and those governed by Class-I TCP TFs.In a previous study from our laboratory, based on microarray data, upregulation of
OsTCP19, a Class-I TCP TF, in response to dehydration, salinity and cold was
inferred13. The present work was undertaken to explore any possible
role of Class-I TCP TFs in stress signaling network in rice. The results of the present
work provide evidence about the possible mechanism by which OsTCP19 may confer salt and
water-deficit tolerance.
Results
Abiotic stress-responsiveness of OsTCP19
A previous microarray analysis from our laboratory pointed out an increase in
expression of a Class-I TCP TF gene, OsTCP19, within a few hours exposure
of rice seedlings to salt, drought and cold stress13 (GSE6901;
Supplementary Fig. S1a,b online). To substantiate this
observation and elucidate the role of this gene in stress tolerance, a detailed
qRT-PCR analysis was conducted and the expression profile of OsTCP19 from
stress-sensitive indica rice variety Pusa Basmati 1(PB1) was compared with that
from salt-tolerant Pokkali and drought-tolerant Nagina 22 (N22) rice genotypes
under salt and drought stress, respectively. Compared to the untreated control
samples (0 h), qRT-PCR analysis for shoots of 0, 0.5, 3, 6 and 24 h salt
stressed PB1 and Pokkali rice seedlings confirmed 5 to 6-fold upregulation of
this gene within 6 h of stress (Figure 1a,b). About 2-fold
upregulation of this gene within 3 h of salt stress was also observed for roots
of salt stressed PB1 and Pokkali seedlings (Figure 1d,e).
While this expression increases up to 9-fold (by 24 h) and 5-fold (by 5 and 6 h)
under water-deficit stress in shoots of PB1 and N22, respectively,
water-deprived roots of both these varieties only show marginal fluctuation in
transcript abundance (Figure 1g,h,j,k). Interestingly, a
comparison of the relative transcript level with respect to the reference gene
(UBQ5) expression (2−Δ
plot) indicated higher abundance of OsTCP19 in the tissues of
stress-tolerant varieties than the sensitive PB1 variety at least during early
hours of stress exposure (Figure 1c,f,i,l). These results
suggest a probable role of OsTCP19 in early response to abiotic
stresses.
Figure 1
OsTCP19 is upregulated under salt and water-deficit stress.
(a,b,d,e,g,h,j,k) qRT PCR analysis indicating fold-change in
expression (2−ΔΔCt plot) of
OsTCP19 in shoots and roots of PB1, Pokkali and N22 rice under
salt (200 mM NaCl) or water-deficit (air-drying) stress over their
respective controls (unstressed tissue, 0 h sample). Value of control sample
(not shown in the histogram) is equivalent to 1 and
‘*’ indicates data significantly different from
control sample (t-test, two tailed p-value ≤ 0.05).
(c,f,i,l) Comparison of the OsTCP19 transcript level under
water-deficit or salt stress in PB1, Pokkali and N22 rice varieties relative
to the reference gene (UBQ5) expression
(2–ΔCt plot).
‘*’ indicates data significantly different from
PB1 rice (t-test, two-tailed p-value ≤ 0.05). In all
cases, X-axis indicates different time points after stress subjection and
the error bars represent SD, and the p-value is mentioned over the
respective bars. All data were simulated from three independent set of
experiments (biological replicates). For each set of experiment, all
varieties of rice were grown and subjected to stress simultaneously.
Expression of OsTCP19 was also positively influenced by exogenous application of
stress-related hormones, namely, ABA, salicylic acid and methyl jasmonate (Supplementary Fig. S1c online). However, ABA caused most
consistent and intensified expression (about 5-fold) of this gene, indicating a
strong association of OsTCP19 with ABA-mediated abiotic stress-signaling
pathways. The untreated PB1 seedlings, incubated simply in fresh Yoshida medium
for the same duration as mentioned for stress or hormone treatments, did not
show any significant difference in OsTCP19 expression (Supplementary Fig. 1d online). This indicated that the alteration in
OsTCP19 expression is specific to stress and hormone treatments.
OsTCP19 from indica rice contains an alternatively spliced
intron
OsTCP19 was found to share more similarity with homologous protein sequences from
monocots than other plant groups (Supplementary Fig. S2a
online; Supplementary Table S1 online). Among
Arabidopsis sequences, TCP15 and TCP14 were found closest
(49–52% similarity) to OsTCP19 (Supplementary Fig.
S2b,c online). RGAP database annotates this gene as intronless.
However, its cloning using PB1 rice genomic DNA revealed the presence of an
in-frame 36 bp insertion just before the designated TCP-domain. Owing to broad
conservation in TCP-regulated pathways across plant species, this cloned
fragment was overexpressed in Arabidopsis thaliana (Col-0) under the
control of CaMV 35S promoter (p35S:OsTCP19) for evaluating its
role in stress tolerance (Supplementary Fig. S4a online).
The 36 bp insertion and the flanking regions bear little similarity to
Arabidopsis sequences. Hence, primers designed from the flanking
regions (36-i primers) were used in a RT-PCR analysis meant for recording the
level of expression of the transgene. This, however, resulted in amplification
of about 136 bp DNA fragment instead of 172 bp suggesting this insertion, which
begins and ends with GC and AG dinucleotides, is spliced and represents an
intron.Further RT-PCR analyses for studying the splicing of this gene using 36-i primers
detected higher abundance of the spliced form (OsTCP19s; 136 bp amplicon)
than the unspliced form (OsTCP19i; 172 bp amplicon) of OsTCP19 in
all tested samples of PB1 rice except 24 h salt stressed shoots and 3 h or more
water-deficit stressed roots (Figure 2a). As amino acid
stretch similar to that encoded by the 36 bp intron is present in homologous
proteins from other monocots (Supplementary Fig. S2d
online), higher abundance of OsTCP19i in other rice varieties
appeared possible. On further analysis, OsTCP19i was observed as the
major transcript form in all the stressed tissues of N22 whereas OsTCP19s
transcript seems scarcely detectable (Figure 2b). While
both forms were detected in unstressed Pokkali shoots, OsTCP19i was
significantly enriched under salt stress (Figure 2b).
Expression of OsTCP19s remained rather low in Pokkali roots. Any
possibility of genomic DNA contamination in these assays was ruled out by a
control RT-PCR using primers flanking an intron of OsEF1α
(LOC_Os03g08020) which only amplified DNA fragment (103 bp) of size
expected from cDNA. A graphical representation of this analysis is shown in
‘Supplementary Fig. S3 online’.
Thus, it appears that OsTCP19 from indica rice bears an alternatively
spliced GC-AG intron and its splicing is dependent on plant type, variety,
tissue and stress condition.
Figure 2
Splicing of OsTCP19 and subcellular localization of the encoded
proteins.
(a,b) RT-PCR analysis using primers flanking an intron of OsTCP19 and
OsEF1α for unstressed (0 h) and stressed (0.5-24 h)
tissues of indica rice seedlings (as indicated). M indicates the marker
lane. The black and grey arrows correspond to band size of 172 bp and 136
bp, respectively. (c) ClustalW alignment showing region of mutation (black
arrows) at the intron boundaries of mOsTCP19i relative to
OsTCP19s and OsTCP19i, and the corresponding change in
protein sequence (grey arrow). The numbers correspond to the respective
nucleotide or amino acid position. (d) RT-PCR analysis of tobacco leaves
infiltrated with Agrobacterium cells bearing construct
p35S:OsTCP19s (lane s) and p35S:mOsTCP19i (lane m) using
primers flanking OsTCP19 intron. (e,f) Fluorescence microscopy of onion
epidermal cells expressing either YFP, YFP-mOsTCP19i or
YFP-OsTCP19s as indicated (scale bar = 50 µm). (g)
Higher resolution images of nuclear YFP fluorescence (scale bar = 10
µm).
For further characterization, OsTCP19s was cloned from PB1 rice seedlings.
The 5’ and 3’ intron boundaries of OsTCP19i were also
mutated (5’GC≫GG, 3’AG≫AA) to
restrict its splicing (mOsTCP19i) which, however, resulted in an Ala to
Gly transition in the protein sequence (Figure 2c). This
mutant construct was validated experimentally and only unspliced transcripts
could be detected in tobacco leaf cells transiently expressing mOsTCP19i under
the regulation of CaMV 35S promoter (Figure 2d). Particle
bombardment of constructs bearing these ORFs fused to C-terminus of YFP
(p35S:YFP-mOsTCP19i and p35S:YFP-OsTCP19s) on onion epidermal
cells revealed the nuclear enrichment for both the proteins (Figure 2e). Control construct, p35S:YFP, generates
fluorescence dispersed throughout the cell (Figure 2f). In
addition to their presence in the whole nucleus, both these proteins were also
detected in the form of multiple nuclear bodies (NB; Figure
2g) indicating the role of OsTCP19 in transcription as well as other
nuclear phenomena.
Phenotype and stress response of p35S:OsTCP19
Arabidopsis transgenics
For functional analysis, four T3 generation p35S:OsTCP19 transgenic lines,
L1, L5, L6 and L8, homozygous for single insertion were selected. During
screening of T0 seeds, a line negative for hygromycin selection marker was also
picked. This line, NT, was used as a negative control besides wild-type, WT,
plants in various analyses. As mentioned before, OsTCP19s but not
OsTCP19i transcripts could be detected by RT-PCR analysis in the
transgenic seedlings grown on only MS medium (control) or supplemented with 125
mM NaCl or 350 mM mannitol (Figure 3a). Moreover, the
expression was rather low in L5 compared to other transgenic lines, whereas no
specific amplification was obtained for WT and NT plants.
Figure 3
Phenotypes of p35S:OsTCP19 Arabidopsis transgenic plants.
(a) Semi-qRT-PCR using 36-i primers depicting amplification of 136 bp
fragments in transgenics (L1, L5, L6, L8) but not in NT and WT plants under
control (C; unstressed), salt stress (N; 125 mM NaCl) and water-deficit
stress (M; 350 mM mannitol). ACT2 was used as endogenous control. (b)
Root growth in 10-day-old transgenic, NT and WT seedlings. The analysis was
performed with a total of 250–300 plants grown in three
independent batches. (c) LR formation in 15-day-old transgenic and WT
seedlings grown in glass vials containing 0.2% phytagel or Petri plates
containing 0.8% agar as solidification base. Histogram was plotted from the
analysis of at least 100 plants grown in three independent batches in Petri
plates. (d) RH in 15-day-old seedlings of transgenic and WT plants. (e)
Trichomes in ~11 cm long inflorescence stem of transgenic and WT plants.
Error bars in the histograms indicate SD. ‘*’
indicates data significantly different from WT (t-test, two-tailed
p-value ≤ 0.05). In all histograms, the p-value is mentioned over
the respective bars.
Although both transgenic and non-transgenic plants displayed similar efficiency
and rate of germination (Supplementary Fig. S4b online),
slower initial growth of the transgenic lines was clearly inferred and was
evident by reduced rate of root elongation till 15 days after germination (DAG;
Figure 3b, Supplementary Fig. S4e
online). Strikingly, by 15 DAG, the transgenic plants displayed
significantly fewer numbers of lateral roots (LRs) as compared to WT plants
(Figure 3c). The transgenic plants visually appeared
to have higher number of trichomes on the inflorescence stem and more root hairs
(RHs; Figure 3d,e), indicating a possible role of
OsTCP19 in epidermal cell differentiation as well. In addition, early
flowering was observed in the transgenic lines grown on MS-agar medium inside
vertically oriented Petri plates (Supplementary Fig. S4c
online). However, this phenotype could not be inferred convincingly in
plants grown in pots containing Soilrite mix. Therefore, constitutive
overexpression of OsTCP19 in Arabidopsis affects initial seedling
growth, LR development, trichome and RH formation, and condition-dependent early
flowering.The seeds of WT, NT and transgenic plants had no major difference in germination
response under salt and water-deficit stress (Supplementary Fig.
S4f online). However, following germination, seedling establishment,
growth and biomass accumulation were strikingly better in transgenic lines than
WT or NT plants under higher (125 mM NaCl or 350 mM mannitol) but not lower (100
mM NaCl or 200 mM mannitol) degree of stress (Figure
4a–d; Supplementary Fig. S4g,h
online). These results suggest a role for OsTCP19 in
stress-responsive post-germination growth, seedling establishment and biomass
accumulation but not in germination per se. In a different experiment,
when 12-day-old unstressed plants were transferred and observed for further 33
days in vertically oriented Petri plates containing MS-agar medium supplemented
with 100 mM NaCl, better efficiency of flowering was found in transgenic than WT
plants (Supplementary Fig. S4d online). This probably is
related to mechanisms that caused early flowering in unstressed plants (Supplementary Fig. S4c online).
Figure 4
Abiotic stress tolerance of p35S:OsTCP19 Arabidopsis transgenic
plants.
(a–c) Post-germination growth and seedling establishment of WT, NT
and transgenic plants (15 DAG) in response to salt and water-deficit stress
under horizontal and vertical growth conditions. (d) Ratio of total biomass
accumulated (per 100 seeds sown) by different transgenic, WT or NT lines
under abiotic stresses (as indicated) to that under control condition. (e)
Analysis of water-deficit (water withholding) and salt (200 mM NaCl)
tolerance level in 2-week stresses plants (24-day-old) that were allowed to
recover for 1 week. (f,g) Percentage of plant recovered or survived at the
end of recovery phase. Error bars in the histograms represent SD.
‘*’ indicates data significantly different from WT
(t-test, two-tailed p-value ≤ 0.05). The p-value is
mentioned over the respective bars of the histograms. All analyses were
performed with plants grown in three independent batches (biological
replicates). For each independent set of experiment, the data was either
simulated from six Petri plates (for a–d) or 50 plants (for
e–g).
Compared to WT, detached leaves of 22-day-old plants of transgenic lines L1 and
L8 suffered less cell death after 15 h incubation in salt solution which was
evident by weaker staining using Evans blue (Supplementary Fig.
S5a online). Decrease in the rate of water loss in detached leaves of
transgenic plants was also clearly revealed by monitoring the time-dependent
loss in fresh weight (Supplementary Fig. S5b online). When
stressed with 200 mM NaCl or by water-withholding for two weeks, the 24-day-old
L1 and L8 transgenic lines displayed better survival and appeared healthier than
WT plants (Figure 4e). Not only better relative water
content (RWC) but also reduced reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation, as
revealed by H2DCFDA staining, was observed in the leaves of 12-day
stressed transgenic plants (Supplementary Fig. S5c-e
online). Within 1-week of irrigation with RO water, while nearly 80% L8
and 60% L1 transgenics recovered from water-deficit stress, this recovery was
confined only to 25–30% WT plants (Figure
4e,f). None of the tested plant lines showed recovery from salt stress
during 1-week of irrigation with RO water. Nonetheless, the transgenics
displayed a slower rate of death since significantly more number of transgenics
bearing green and expanded leaves was observed towards the end of this recovery
phase than the WT plants (Figure 4e,g). Plants grown only
under control condition do not display any distinct difference between them
(Figure 4e).
Overexpression of OsTCP19 affects ABA, auxin and JA signaling in
Arabidopsis
Since OsTCP19 overexpression transgenics were compromised in LR
development, it was decided to explore the underlying changes in gene expression
to gain knowledge about the role of OsTCP19 in the signaling
network. Moreover, as TCP TFs influence the expression of genes of
various hormonal pathways, important regulators of LR development belonging to
such pathways were picked for expression analysis in the transgenics. Inhibition
of various auxin responsive factors (ARFs) by many AUX/IAAs and modulation of
PIN transporters are known to cause reduction in LR formation14.
Elevation of endogenous cytokinin level and inhibition of jasmonate signaling
also attenuates LR formation1516. Consistent with these
reports, genes for four AUX/IAAs (IAA3, IAA12, IAA14,
IAA28), two PIN transporters (PIN1 and PIN2), three
isopentenyltransferases (IPT1, IPT2 and IPT5; involved in
cytokinin biosynthesis) and two lipoxygenases (LOX1 and LOX2;
involved in JA biosynthesis) were selected for expression analysis. ABA also
mediates LR inhibition through ABI417. Although ABI3 (a B3 domain
containing TF) fine tunes the auxin-mediated LR formation, it works in close
association with ABI4 (an AP2 TF) along with ABI5 in many ABA-dependent
signaling pathways1819. Hence, these three genes were also
considered. As ethylene also inhibits lateral root formation20,
five well characterized ERFs (RAP2.2, RAP2.3, RAP2.12,
HRE1 and TINY2) were also added to the list of genes for
transcript analysis.To ensure robustness of the data, transcript level of these genes were monitored
in three different transgenic lines (L1, L6 and L8) and results were considered
significant only if all these lines exhibited similar trend compared to WT.
ABI3, ABI4 and IAA3 transcripts were enriched by 2 or
more folds in the transgenic plants compared to WT (Figure
5). About 3-fold downregulation of LOX2 was also observed in
these transgenic lines. Coexpression analysis (using ‘Abiotic
stress’ option; correlation coefficient cut off 0.5) in RiceOligonucleotide array database (ROAD) also shows that expression of
OsTCP19 positively correlates with nine IAAs, thirteen
AP2 (like ABI4) and one B3 domain protein (like ABI3). In
addition, a negative correlation between OsTCP19 and a LOX gene
(similar to ArabidopsisLOX2) was observed (Supplementary Table S2 online).
This further suggests that OsTCP19 negatively influences auxin and JA
signaling, and affects expression of similar class of genes in
Arabidopsis and rice. Presence of Class-I TCP binding sites (site-II
elements) in the promoter of many of these genes points to a possibility of
direct regulation by OsTCP19 (Supplementary Fig. S6a
online).
Figure 5
Fold-change in expression of different genes in transgenics (L8, L6 and L1)
over WT plants.
The analyzed genes and the respective hormonal pathways are mentioned for
each histogram. The error bars represent the SD. ‘*’
indicates data significantly different from WT (t-test, two-tailed
p-value ≤ 0.05). The p-value is mentioned over the respective
bars of the histograms. The analysis was performed with 15-day old
seedlings grown on MS medium in three independent batches (biological
replicates). For each independent set of experiment, the sampling was done
from a single Petri plate supporting the growth all transgenic and WT
plants.
OsTCP19 influences lipid droplet synthesis and
metabolism
Under abiotic stress, upregulation of triacylglycerol (TAG) biosynthesis gene
diacylglycerolacetyl transferase (DGAT1) by ABI4 leads to
accumulation of lipid droplets (LDs) in vegetative tissue of
Arabidopsis21. Incidentally, dgat1Arabidopsis
mutants are hypersensitive to abiotic stresses during seedling establishment
which is in contrast to that observed in case of p35S:OsTCP19
Arabidopsis transgenics22. By qRT-PCR analysis, about 1.5
times higher expression of DGAT1 in the transgenic (L1 and L8) than WT
plants was observed (Figure 6a) and appears to be
consistent with the increase in ABI4 expression. Nile red staining of
leaf protoplasts revealed hyperaccumulation of LDs in transgenic line L8
(relative to WT; Figure 6b). Further analysis revealed
increased expression of two other stress-responsive TAG biosynthesis genes21, DGAT2 and phospholipid:diacylglycerol acyltransferase
1 PDAT1), in transgenic lines by ca.
1.5-fold and 2-fold, respectively (Figure 6a,c). A
LD-associated Arabidopsis protein Caleosin 3 (CLO3 or RD20; a
peroxygenase) is known to play an important role in abiotic stress
signaling23. Analysis in ROAD suggests positive correlation
between expression of OsTCP19 and two caleosin genes, one of them
(LOC_Os03g12230) being highly similar to ArabidopsisCLO3 (Supplementary Table S2 online). Higher
expression of this gene was also observed in p35S:OsTCP19 transgenics
compared to WT Arabidopsis plants (Figure 6c).
Figure 6
OsTCP19 influences LD accumulation.
(a,c) Fold-change in expression of AtDGAT1,
AtDGAT2, PDAT1 and CLO3 in p35S:OsTCP19 (L1 and L8) over WT
Arabidopsis plants. (b) Fluorescence microscopy images of Nile
red stained LDs in leaf protoplasts of transgenic (L8-D) and wild
type (WT-D) plants. The image of the same protoplasts under bright field is
also shown (L8-B and WT-B). (d) Expression analysis of uidA gene in
tobacco leaves transiently transformed with constructs as indicated. Error
bar in the histograms represents SD and ‘*’ indicates
data significantly different from the respective controls (t-test,
two-tailed p-value ≤ 0.05). The p-value is mentioned over the
respective bars of the histograms. All analyses were performed with 15-day
old seedlings grown on MS medium in three independent batches (biological
replicates). For each independent set of experiment, the sampling was done
from a single Petri plate supporting the growth all transgenic and WT
plants.
The OsDGAT gene (LOC_Os02g48350) was observed to coexpress with
OsTCP19 in ROAD (Supplementary Table S2 online).
Its promoter also contains three distinct Class-I TCP TF binding sites (Supplementary Fig. S6b online). Using promoter:GUS
construct bearing 1097 bp DNA region upstream of start codon of this gene
(pOsDGAT:uidA) and effector constructs prepared using ORF encoding
OsTCP19s activation of OsDGAT expression by OsTCP19 was
demonstrated by agroinfiltration of tobacco leaves. Construct bearing a rice
gene encoding a member of secretory phosphatases (p35S:OsPHOS;
LOC_Os01g57240) and unrelated to nuclear activities was used as
control effector. Nearly 2-fold upregulation of uidA was inferred by
qRT-PCR analysis for leaf zones co-expressing OsTCP19s compared to those
co-expressing the control effector (Figure 6d). In this
analysis, the plant selection marker of these vectors, hptII, was used as
reference gene. OsTCP19i and mOsTCP19i also caused activation of OsDGAT
to essentially similar levels (Figure 6d). All these data
indicate that OsTCP19 plays an important role in stress signaling by
influencing LD biosynthesis as well as its metabolism.
OsTCP19 interacts with OsABI4 and OsULT1
p35S:OsTCP19
Arabidopsis transgenics showed better seedling establishment and survival
under abiotic stresses and conditional early flowering which contradict the
established activities of the upregulated genes ABI3 and ABI4212425. This led to hypothesize a model involving
condition-dependent regulation of ABI3 and ABI4 beyond
transcriptional level in the transgenic plants and might involve physical
interaction of these proteins with OsTCP19. A bimolecular fluorescence
complementation (BiFC) assay was carried out to test this hypothesis in rice
using constructs bearing N-terminus of YFP fused to N-terminus of
OsABI4 (LOC_Os05g28350; p35S:YFPn-OsABI4) and
C-terminus of YFP fused to C-terminus of OsTCP19s
(p35S:OsTCP19s-YFPc). On particle bombardment, YFP fluorescence was
detected exclusively in nucleus of the transformed onion epidermal cells. Thus,
it indicated a nucleus-specific interaction between OsTCP19 and OsABI4 (Figure 7a). This also substantiates the hypothesis that
OsTCP19 can modulate the activity of OsABI4 and control pathways in rice as
observed in Arabidopsis.
Figure 7
BiFC analysis showing nucleus specific interaction of OsTCP19 with OsABI4 and
OsULT1.
(a) Fluorescence microscopy images of onion epidermal cells cotransfected
with p35S:YFPn-OsABI4 and p35S:OsTCP19s-YFPc constructs (scale
bar = 100 µm). (b) Similar analysis for cells
cotransfected with p35S:YFPn-OsULT1 and p35S:YFPc-OsTCP19s
(scale bar = 50 µm).
A subset of NB localizing proteins in metazoans is known to contain
SAND-domain26. OsTCP19 was envisaged to interact with few
such proteins based on the presence SAND-domain containing proteins in plants
and localization of OsTCP19 to NBs. Two functionally redundant SAND-domain
containing transcriptional regulators, ULT1 and ULT2, regulate set of genes
including those belonging to KNOX1 group which, interestingly, are also the
targets of many Class-I TCP proteins527. This further suggests
a possibility of interaction between OsTCP19 and ULT-like genes from rice. BiFC
analysis in onion epidermal cells using constructs bearing N-terminus YFP
fused to N-terminus of OsULT1 (LOC_Os01g57240;
p35S:YFPn-OsULT1) and C-terminus YFP fused to N-terminus of
OsTCP19s (p35S:YFPc-OsTCP19s) revealed strong YFP
fluorescence in the nucleus (Figure 7b). Thus, OsTCP19 can
interact with ULT-like proteins which are known coregulators of transcription.
Similar analyses also indicate interaction of OsABI4 and OsULT1 with the protein
encoded by the unspliced form of OsTCP19 (Supplementary Fig. S7,
S8 online). No true fluorescence was observed when BiFC assays were
done for various negative controls (Supplementary Fig. S9
online). Interaction of OsABI4 and OsULT1 with OsTCP19s was also
observed in yeast two-hybrid assays, thus substantiating BiFC data (Supplementary Fig. S10 online).
Discussion
Nuclear localization of TCP proteins is expected as they belong to TF family. Besides
whole nucleus, OsTCP19 was also localized in NBs. Apart from general eukaryotic NBs
(like speckles, histone locus body, stress granules etc.)28, those
containing cyclophillin, HYL1, phytochrome and AKIP1 are known to exist in
plants29. However, the nature of NBs where OsTCP19s and OsTCP19i
localize remains to be determined.ULT1 and ULT2 are trithorax group (trxG) factors30 and function by
recruiting trxG proteins like ATX1, which is a histone H3 lysine 4
tri-methyltransferase and regulator of dehydration response in
Arabidopsis31. TrxG proteins antagonise the activity of
polycomb group (PcG) gene repression complexes which include MSI1, a negative
regulator of stress signaling and Class-I TCP regulated pathways12.
Hence, the interaction between OsTCP19 and OsULT1 might suggest the existence of a
regulatory module comprised of few Class-I TCP TFs, ULT1- and ATX1-like proteins
that can configure the abiotic stress signal network.The decrease in LR number in p35S:OsTCP19
Arabidopsis transgenic plants were attributed to upregulation of ABI4
and IAA3 and downregulation of LOX2. These expression changes could
even explain slow initial root growth and increased formation of trichomes and RHs
in the transgenics323334. Reduction in LR number is considered as
an adaptive response towards drought stress tolerance35. RHs bear
membrane integrated H+-ATPases which mediate root-to-shoot signaling
and maintain osmoregulation and water content under drought stress36.
Trichomes aid in reducing transpiration and behave as a sink for glutathione which
contributes in combating oxidative stress and water loss under harsh environmental
conditions37. Thus, the phenotypes displayed by
p35S:OsTCP19 transgenics also contribute to abiotic stress tolerance.
Earlier, it has been found that TCP14/15 regulate trichome formation
and disturbances in TCP20 activity severely affect roots elongation in
Arabidopsis3839.Earlier studies reveal better drought tolerance for mutants of jasmonate signaling in
plants40. Jasmonate signaling promotes ROS production41 which though aids in generating stress responses but is deleterious
to plants at higher concentration42. Hence, by regulating LOX2
expression, OsTCP19 might assist in keeping a partial check over ROS
concentration. This in turn provides an optimum chance for survival under
environmental stresses. Upregulation of IAA3 in the transgenic plants might
have negated the effect of increased expression of ABI3 which usually has a
role in auxin-mediated LR formation1419. Interestingly,
OsTCP19 upregulates under cold stress (as per microarray data) and
ABI3 also provides freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis43. Few Class-I TCPs are known to regulate the expression of
IAA3 (e.g. AtTCP15) positively and LOX2 negatively (e.g. AtTCP20)
by binding to their promoter sequences in Arabidopsis344.
Presence of Class-I TCP binding sites in upstream region of similar genes which are
positively or negatively coexpressed with OsTCP19 imply the conservation of
similar regulatory pathways in rice.Knowledge about the role of LDs in vegetative tissues is limited. Recent studies have
shown hyperaccumulation of LDs in vegetative tissues of Arabidopsis in
response to various abiotic stresses and hormones treatments21.
Similar accumulation of TAG has also been reported for monocots under abiotic
stress45. Despite a positive correlation between the increase in
LDs and inhibition of seedling establishment, LDs are still considered to have a
role in seed germination and seedling establishment under various stresses. This is
evident from Arabidopsisdgat1 mutant plants which are compromised in these traits22.
Elevated expression of DGAT1 during both cell division (in shoot and root apical
meristem) and senescence (of leaves) suggests a contrasting role for LD in these
processes4647. Thus, it is being hypothesized that by serving
as a rich source of energy and nutrients to sustain cell division, increased levels
of TAG in p35S:OsTCP19
Arabidopsis plants might support seedling establishment under conditions
severely affecting normal metabolic pathways, like abiotic stresses.OsTCP19 caused hyperaccumulation of LDs by increasing the expression of
multiple abiotic stress-upregulated TAG biosynthesis genes like DGAT1,
DGAT2 and PDAT1, and this is partly dependent on ABI4 as it
directly activates DGAT1 in association with ABI521. In the
present study, two-fold increase in the activity of OsDGAT promoter due to
direct activation by OsTCP19 was also observed. A higher activation might depend on
relative abundance of other endogenous factors which probably were limiting during
the transient assays in tobacco leaves. An earlier study also reported the failure
of many Class-I TCP proteins from rice to cause any transactivation in cultured
tobacco cells or mesophyll protoplasts by co-transfection assays1. In
another case, AtTCP20-EAR (AtTCP20 fused to EAR repression domain) failed to repress
PCNA in Arabidopsis transgenics, although binding of AtTCP20 to PCNA promoter
has been shown by in vitro and in vivo assays38.Recent studies revealed that LDs per se could be of little importance and, in
fact, the associated proteins and the process of lipid metabolism decide their
function48. Expression of CLO3 was increased in
p35S:OsTCP19
Arabidopsis plants. This Ca2+-binding LD-associated caleosin
protein upregulates in vegetative tissue under abiotic stresses and plays a role in
drought tolerance by reducing transpiration23. The expression of a
similar gene from rice also correlates (as per ROAD) with that of OsTCP19.
Similar CLO3-regulated pathways in rice may get affected by
OsTCP19.In the present study, early flowering of the transgenics in vertically oriented Petri
plates revealed the condition-dependent activity of OsTCP19. Earlier studies
reported condition-dependent contrasting functions for TCP14 and TCP15 in
Arabidopsis49. This study postulates a conditional
regulation of ABI4 activity by OsTCP19 and was substantiated by the interaction
between these proteins. This hypothesis seems to fit in a model that will allow
increased tolerance to dehydration and salinity, and phenotype like early flowering
to occur despite higher expression of ABI4 and ABI3. Interestingly,
mutants of TCP14 show hypersensitivity to ABA during germination and
expression of a dominant repressor form of TCP15 affects seedling establishment in
Arabidopsis4450. Although, genes of similar classes were
found to coexpress with OsTCP19 in rice, none were direct homologue of
ABI3 or ABI4. However, a conditional upregulation of these genes
by OsTCP19 remains possible due to disturbances in other hormone (like auxin)
pathways17.Based on many reports, ABI4 was chosen as a target of direct regulation by OsTCP19.
First, ABI4 is known to regulate ABI3 expression in many signaling
pathways18. Second, ABI4 is a dynamic transcription factor which
can switch its activity from activator to repressor in a conditional manner51. Third, it can serve as a link between cytokinin and ABA
signaling17. Coincidently, Class-I TCP TFs also play a role in
cytokinin-dependent pathways and, in the present study too, OsTCP19
transcript levels were upregulated by exogenous ABA application. Moreover, ABI4 from
monocots are functionally similar to that from Arabidopsis525354. These reports and the present results together suggest a
role for OsTCP19 in fine-tuning ABA signaling by regulating the expression and
activity of key proteins like ABI4.In short, the present study assigns a role for OsTCP19 in calibrating and
crosslinking the developmental and stress-response pathways by interfering with
auxin and JA acid pathways and manipulation of the ABA-signaling network. It could
partly mediate this by recruiting trxG factor for activation of the target genes and
by interacting with key regulators like ABI4. Its role in stress tolerance is
mediated by the accumulation of LDs and associated proteins besides reduction in
cell death, water loss and ROS production. The phenotypes displayed by the
transgenics, stress tolerance assays and expression analysis together indicate an
extensive role of OsTCP19 in water-deficit stress signaling. However, it
might be involved in shaping the early signaling pathways in response to various
abiotic stresses. In conclusion, this study unravels the role of a rice gene,
OsTCP19 and extends the role of Class-I TCP TFs in abiotic stress
response and ABA signaling.
Methods
Plant material and growth conditions
Sterilized (70% ethanol, 1 min; 3.5% NaOCl, 40 min) seeds of PB1, Pokkali and N22
indica rice were grown in liquid Yoshida medium55 under 12 h
light condition. 10-day-old seedlings were subjected to different treatments (as
mentioned in results) in hydroponic culture system in the presence of Yoshida
medium. Sterilized (70% ethanol, 30 sec; 0.6% NaOCl and 0.001% Tween-20, 10 min)
Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 seeds were germinated and grown on
Murashige and Skoog (MS; Duchefa) medium containing 1% sucrose and 0.8% purified
agar under continuous illumination at 21oC following
stratification. For salt and water-deficit treatments, NaCl (100 mM or 125 mM)
or mannitol (200 mM or 350 mM) were provided as additives to Arabidopsis
growing medium. When required, 6-8 leaf stage, healthy plants were transferred
to pots containing Soilrite (a combination of Vermiculture, Perlite and Spagnum
moss; 1:1:1 ratio) and irrigated with RO water. During assessment of stress
tolerance in pots, either irrigation was stopped or was done with 200 mM NaCl
solution every four days. For recovery from these stresses, plant were irrigated
with normal RO water and observed for one week. Samples were either processed
for further analysis or stored under frozen condition till use. All experiments
were done with at least three biological replicates.
In
silico analysis
Details about the databases and software used for doing various in silico
analyses are mentioned in ‘Supplementary Table S3
online’.
Gene expression analysis
RNA was extracted from different samples using Trizol (Sigma). cDNA was
synthesized using ‘Applied biosystems High capacity cDNA synthesis
kit’ (Life technologies). Expression analysis of genes or their
splice forms was achieved either by qRT-PCR following manufacturer’s
protocol (‘Applied biosystems 7500 fast real time machine’
and ‘Applied biosystems fast SYBR green mix’, Life
technologies) or semi-qRT-PCR under standard PCR conditions followed by gel
electrophoresis. Sequences of all primers used for the analyses are mentioned in
‘Supplementary Table S4 online’.
For qRT-PCR analysis either rice Ubiquitin5 (UBQ5; for rice
samples) or ArabidopsisActin2 (ACT2; for Arabidopsis samples) were used as
reference genes. The Ct values obtained for various samples were first
normalized with that for the respective reference gene (ΔCt). To
obtain fold change in expression (as per the case), the ΔCt values of
various genes for different samples were again normalized to that for unstressed
tissue (0 h samples) or the wild type plants (ΔΔCt). The
final values for fold change in expression were derived by calculating
2–ΔΔCt. To compare the
abundance of OsTCP19 transcripts across various rice varieties,
2–ΔCt were calculated which represent
the relative expression level of the gene with respect to the reference
gene.
Preparation of different constructs
OsTCP19 was cloned in TA-cloning vector (pGEMT-easy, Promega) following
its amplification by PCR using PB1 rice genomic DNA and primers flanking the ORF
(Supplementary Table S5 online, S.No. 1-2). By
incorporating NcoI and SpeI sites as overhangs in the concerned
primers (Supplementary Table S5 online, S.No. 3-4), the ORF
with its stop codon was PCR amplified from OsTCP19_PGEMT plasmid and
mobilized into pCAMBIA1302 vector (www.cambia.org) between CaMV 35S promoter and mGFP using
the facility of these restriction sites to create p35S:OsTCP19 construct.
Applying ‘Phusion site directed mutagenesis kit’ (Thermo
scientific) and primers as described in ‘Supplementary
Table S5 online (S.No. 7-8)’, a mutated version of
OsTCP19 (mOsTCP19i) was created by replacing the first GC and
last AG dinucleotides of the intron to GG and AA, respectively. OsABI4
(LOC_Os05g28350; homologous to ABI4 from Zea mays and
Arabidopsis), OsULT1 (LOC_Os01g57240; homologous to
ArabidopsisULT1 and ULT2) and spliced OsTCP19 form were amplified from
PB1 cDNA using primer as mentioned in Supplementary Table S5
online (S.No. 1-2, 9-10, 13-14). As per manufacturer’s
instructions, primers were designed (Supplementary Table S5
online, S.No. 5-6, 11-12, 15-16) and following PCR the ORFs of
OsULT1, OsABI4 and OsTCP19 (spliced, unspliced and
mutated forms) were first cloned in pENTR-D-Topo entry vector (Invitrogen, Life
Technologies) and then mobilized into various destination vectors (Supplementary Table S6 online, S.No. 1-13) by recombination using
‘Invitrogen LR clonase II mix’ (Life technologies).
Similarly, 1097 bp genomic fragment upstream of OsDGAT
(LOC_Os02g48350) was also amplified and cloned in Gateway vector for
the preparation of pOsDGAT:uidA construct (Supplementary
Table S5 online, S.No 17-20; Supplementary Table S6
online, S.No. 17).
Yeast Two-Hybrid analysis
OsABI4 and OsULT1 were cloned in PGBKT7-DEST (bait vector) and
OsTCP19s in PGADT7-DEST (prey vector) by gateway cloning to create
OsABI4-BD, OsULT1-BD and OsTCP19-AD, respectively (Supplementary Table S6 online, S.No 14-16). Pairwise
co-transformation of these constructs into Saccharomyces cerevisiae AH109
cells was conducted using EZ-transformation kit (MP biomedical) and were then
selected and grown on appropriate medium to check their interactions as per BD
Matchmaker protocol (Clontech).
Subcellular localization and BiFC analysis
For subcellular localization, construct p35S:YFP-OsTCP19s or
p35S:YFP-mOsTCP19i was bombarded on onion epidermal cells as
described56 and imaged by fluorescence microscopy (Eclipse
80i, Nikon). For BiFC, any of the p35S:OsTCP19s-YFPc,
p35S:OsTCP19i-YFPc, p35S-mOsYFP19i-YFPc,
p35S:YFPc-OsTCP19s, p35S:YFPc-OsTCP19i or
p35S:YFPc-mOsTCP19i construct was co-expressed in onion epidermal
cells by particle bombardment and visualized by fluorescence or confocal
microscopy (AOBS TCS-SP2, Leica). Experiments were validated from at least three
separate sets of bombardment, each done with four different onion peels.
Agrobacterium-mediated Arabidopsis transformation
Arabidopsis plants transformation was done using Agrobacterium
tumefaciens strain GV3101 bearing p35S:OsTCP19 construct by
floral dip method as described by Giri et al56.
Transgenic selection was done on hygromycin (15 mg/ml) containing medium. During
selection of T1 plants, a plant line negative for hygromycin
resistance was selected and maintained as a negative control plant (NT).
Visualization of oil bodies
Protoplasts isolated from leaves of 15-day-old plants57 were
stained for 10 min with 0.1% Nile red (stock solution in acetone) in MMG buffer
followed by two brief washings. The protoplasts were then visualized by
fluorescence microscopy (Nikon 80i) using FITC filter.
Analysis of abiotic stress-related parameters
To examine post-germination biomass accumulation of seedlings, the ratio for the
total weight of seedlings developed from hundred seeds under stress and control
condition was calculated. Measurements of relative water content (RWC) and the
analysis of cell death by Evan’s blue staining in the leaves of
Arabidopsis plants were done according to Ji et al.58. The
percentage water loss measurements from excised leaves were done according to
Saez et al.59. ROS accumulation, was studied by staining
leaves with 100 µM
2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate
(H2DCFDA) in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.2 and imaging the fluorescing
stomata using a fluorescence microscope. Fluorescence signal from more than
fifty stomata per leaf were quantified in ImageJ software for preparing a
graphic representation of the data. Data presented are average of three
replicates in each case.
Agroinfiltration of tobacco leaves
This was achieved by injecting a mix of equal proportion of Agrobacterium
tumefaciens strain LBA4404 bearing pDGAT:uidA construct and those
bearing either p35S:OsPHOS, p35S:OsTCP19s, p35S:OsTCP19i or
p35S:OsmTCP19i into tobacco leaves as described by Pandey et
al60. Each analysis was performed in leaves from
three different plants.
Author Contributions
Authors contributions PM and AKT conceived and designed the experiments, and
analyzed all the data. PM performed all the experiments, wrote the initial
manuscript draft and prepared all the figures. AKT did final corrections in the
manuscript.
Authors: Ireneusz Slesak; Marta Libik; Barbara Karpinska; Stanislaw Karpinski; Zbigniew Miszalski Journal: Acta Biochim Pol Date: 2007-02-27 Impact factor: 2.149
Authors: Selahattin Danisman; Aalt D J van Dijk; Andrea Bimbo; Froukje van der Wal; Lars Hennig; Stefan de Folter; Gerco C Angenent; Richard G H Immink Journal: J Exp Bot Date: 2013-10-15 Impact factor: 6.992
Authors: Simon C Groen; Zoé Joly-Lopez; Adrian E Platts; Mignon Natividad; Zoë Fresquez; William M Mauck; Marinell R Quintana; Carlo Leo U Cabral; Rolando O Torres; Rahul Satija; Michael D Purugganan; Amelia Henry Journal: Plant Cell Date: 2022-02-03 Impact factor: 11.277
Authors: Benjamin J Spears; Samuel A McInturf; Carina Collins; Meghann Chlebowski; Leland J Cseke; Jianbin Su; David G Mendoza-Cózatl; Walter Gassmann Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2022-09-28 Impact factor: 8.005