Literature DB >> 25925102

Sexual selection's impacts on ecological specialization: an experimental test.

Karin S Pfennig1, David W Pfennig2, Cody Porter2, Ryan A Martin3.   

Abstract

In many species, individuals specialize on different resources, thereby reducing competition. Such ecological specialization can promote the evolution of alternative ecomorphs-distinct phenotypes adapted for particular resources. Elucidating whether and how this process is influenced by sexual selection is crucial for understanding how ecological specialization promotes the evolution of novel traits and, potentially, speciation between ecomorphs. We evaluated the population-level effects of sexual selection (as mediated by mate choice) on ecological specialization in spadefoot toad tadpoles that express alternative ecomorphs. We manipulated whether sexual selection was present or reversed by mating females to their preferred versus non-preferred males, respectively. We then exposed their tadpoles to resource competition in experimental mesocosms. The resulting distribution of ecomorphs was similar between treatments, but sexual selection generated poorer trait integration in, and lower fitness of, the more specialized carnivore morph. Moreover, disruptive and directional natural selection were weaker in the sexual selection present treatment. Nevertheless, this effect on disruptive selection was smaller than previously documented effects of ecological opportunity and competitor density. Thus, sexual selection can inhibit adaptation to resource competition and thereby hinder ecological specialization, particularly when females obtain fitness benefits from mate choice that offset the cost of producing competitively inferior offspring.
© 2015 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  competition; disruptive selection; mate choice; resource polymorphism; speciation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25925102      PMCID: PMC4424646          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  35 in total

1.  Sexual selection can constrain sympatric speciation.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick; Scott L Nuismer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Environment-dependent selection on mate choice in a natural population of birds.

Authors:  Matthew R Robinson; G Sander van Doorn; Lars Gustafsson; Anna Qvarnström
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 3.  Disruptive selection and then what?

Authors:  Claus Rueffler; Tom J M Van Dooren; Olof Leimar; Peter A Abrams
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  The roles of natural and sexual selection during adaptation to a novel environment.

Authors:  Howard D Rundle; Stephen F Chenoweth; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Estimating evolutionary parameters when viability selection is operating.

Authors:  Jarrod D Hadfield
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Evolutionary diversification in stickleback affects ecosystem functioning.

Authors:  Luke J Harmon; Blake Matthews; Simone Des Roches; Jonathan M Chase; Jonathan B Shurin; Dolph Schluter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Factors influencing progress toward sympatric speciation.

Authors:  X Thibert-Plante; A P Hendry
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 2.411

Review 8.  Ecology, sexual selection and speciation.

Authors:  Martine E Maan; Ole Seehausen
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2011-03-06       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 9.  Magic traits in speciation: 'magic' but not rare?

Authors:  Maria R Servedio; G Sander Van Doorn; Michael Kopp; Alicia M Frame; Patrik Nosil
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 17.712

10.  A maternal effect mediates rapid population divergence and character displacement in spadefoot toads.

Authors:  David W Pfennig; Ryan A Martin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.