Literature DB >> 25924816

Management of traumatic popliteal vascular injuries in a level I trauma center: A 6-year experience.

Jason D Sciarretta1, Francisco Igor B Macedo2, Christian A Otero1, Jose N Figueroa1, Louis R Pizano1, Nicholas Namias1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Popliteal vascular trauma remains a challenging entity, and carries the greatest risk of limb loss among the lower extremity vascular injuries. Operative management of traumatic popliteal vascular injuries continues to evolve. We aim at describing our experience with such complex injuries, with associated patterns of injury, diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, and outcomes.
METHODS: From January 2006 to September 2011, 191 adult trauma patients presented to an urban level I trauma center in Miami, Florida with traumatic lower extremity vascular injuries. Variables collected included age, gender, mechanism of injury, and clinical status at presentation. Surgical data included vessel injury, technical aspects of repair, associated complications and outcomes.
RESULTS: Forty-seven (24.6%) patients were diagnosed with traumatic popliteal vascular injuries. Mean age was 38.1 ± 16.1 years, and the majority of patients were males (43 patients, 91.4%). There were 21 (44.7%) penetrating injuries, and 26 (55.3%) blunt injuries. Vascular repair with saphenous venous interposition graft and PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene) grafting were performed in 36 (70.7%) and 2 (3.9%) patients, respectively. Blunt popliteal injuries were significantly more associated with major tissue loss, and length of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stays. The risk for amputation is increased with longer ICU stays and the use of PTFE grafting for vascular repair. The overall mortality rate in this series was 8.5%.
CONCLUSIONS: Blunt popliteal vascular injuries are associated with increased morbidity compared to penetrating trauma. Early restoration of blood perfusion, frequent use of interposition grafts with autogenous saphenous vein, and liberal use of fasciotomies play important role to achieve acceptable outcomes.
Copyright © 2015 IJS Publishing Group Limited. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blunt; Penetrating; Saphenous venous graft; Traumatic popliteal vascular injuries

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25924816     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.04.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  5 in total

Review 1.  Human iPS Cell-derived Tissue Engineered Vascular Graft: Recent Advances and Future Directions.

Authors:  Xiangyu Shi; Lile He; Shang-Min Zhang; Jiesi Luo
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 5.739

2.  Endovascular Repair of Blunt Popliteal Arterial Injuries.

Authors:  Shan Zhong; Xiquan Zhang; Zhong Chen; Peng Dong; Yequan Sun; Wei Zhu; Xiaolin Pan; Deming Qi
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  Evaluation, Surgical Management and Outcome of Traumatic Extremity Vascular Injuries: A 5-year Level-1 Trauma Centres Experience.

Authors:  Rashid Usman; Muhammad Jamil; Muhammad Faheem Anwer
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2018-09-25

Review 4.  Multidisciplinary team approach in the management of popliteal artery injury.

Authors:  Neal Cooper; Mazen Roshdy; Jason D Sciarretta; Christoph Kaufmann; Scott Duncan; John Davis; Francisco Igor Macedo
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2018-08-28

5.  Vascular injury-related in-hospital mortality in Ontario between 1991 and 2009.

Authors:  Abdulmajeed Altoijry; Thomas F Lindsay; K Wayne Johnston; Muhammad Mamdani; Mohammed Al-Omran
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.671

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.