Literature DB >> 25924657

Concurrent exome-targeted next-generation sequencing and single nucleotide polymorphism array to identify the causative genetic aberrations of isolated Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome.

Mei-Jou Chen1, Shin-Yi Wei1, Wei-Shiung Yang2, Tsai-Tzu Wu3, Huei-Ying Li4, Hong-Nerng Ho1, Yu-Shih Yang1, Pei-Lung Chen5.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Can the use of whole-exome sequencing (WES) together with single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array help to identify novel causative genes of isolated Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome? SUMMARY ANSWER: OR4M2 (olfactory receptor, family 4, subfamily M, member 2) and PDE11A (phosphodiesterase 11A) gene loss-of-function variants as well as deletions at 15q11.2, 19q13.31, 1p36.21, and 1q44 were identified as possible commonly altered regions in patients with type 1 MRKH. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The isolated form of Müllerian aplasia is the most common subtype of MRKH syndrome, which invariably leads to difficulties producing offspring in affected women. However, there is little information currently available to allow for genetic testing and counseling to be performed for those affected by this syndrome. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE AND DURATION: This was a case-series genetic study. A total of seven consecutive unrelated women with type 1 MRKH were enrolled. The enrollment and experimental procedures were performed over a 2-year period. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: Whole exome-targeted next-generation sequencing and SNP array (Affymetrix Genome-Wide Human SNP Array 6.0) were performed on the first five unrelated women with type 1 MRKH syndrome. The data were combined, and the '3-hit principal' was applied on a genome-wide scale to search for the common causative genes. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) and Sanger sequencing were used to validate the identified genomic copy number losses and variants. Replication tests using direct Sanger sequencing and qPCR were performed on the remaining two women with type 1 MRKH syndrome to support the credibility of the potential candidate genes and deletions. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 3443 damaging variants based on WES were shown to intersect with 1336 copy number variations (deletions) derived from the SNP array. Four highly recurrent deletions at 15q11.2 (80%), 19q13.31 (40%), 1p36.21 (40%) and 1q44 (40%) were identified in the first five women with type 1 MRKH syndrome and were considered to be novel candidate aberrations. A previously reported 1q21.1 deletion was also recurrent in two of the first five women with type 1 MRKH syndrome. The 1q44 and 19q13.31 deletions were present in at least one of the two additional patients. Damaging variants were detected in HNRNPCL1 (heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein C-like 1), OR2T2 (olfactory receptor, family 2, subfamily T, member 2), OR4M2, ZNF816 (zinc finger protein 816), and PDE11A in several of the initial five patients. Among these, the damaging variants of OR4M2 (located at 15q11.2) and PDE11A were found in at least one of the two additional patients with type 1 MRKH. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: In this study, we only searched for the deletions or damaging variants causing loss-of-function of genes in at least three of the initial five patients (3-hit criteria). Therefore, the study was designed to only detect common causative genes. Genomic duplications and/or rare individual mutations that may have also contributed to MRKH syndrome were not investigated. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: This study demonstrated the feasibility of the use of combined data from both WES and SNP arrays for the identification of possible common causative genetic aberrations in patients with type 1 MRKH syndrome on a genome-wide scale. Further validation of our found causative genes is required before applying on genetic testing and counseling. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: The study was supported by grants from the National Science Council of Taiwan (NSC98-2314-B002-105-MY3 and NSC 100-2314-B002-027-MY3). The funding sources had no involvement in the design or analysis of the study. The authors have no competing interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome; Müllerian aplasia; next-generation sequencing; single nucleotide polymorphism array; whole-exome sequencing

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25924657     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  8 in total

Review 1.  A tale of two tracts: history, current advances, and future directions of research on sexual differentiation of reproductive tracts†.

Authors:  Fei Zhao; Humphrey Hung-Chang Yao
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 4.285

Review 2.  The Increasing Importance of Gene-Based Analyses.

Authors:  Elizabeth T Cirulli
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 5.917

3.  Copy number variation and regions of homozygosity analysis in patients with MÜLLERIAN aplasia.

Authors:  Durkadin Demir Eksi; Yiping Shen; Munire Erman; Lynn P Chorich; Megan E Sullivan; Meric Bilekdemir; Elanur Yılmaz; Guven Luleci; Hyung-Goo Kim; Ozgul M Alper; Lawrence C Layman
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  Detection of de novo genetic variants in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome by whole genome sequencing.

Authors:  Hong-Xin Pan; Guang-Nan Luo; Sheng-Qing Wan; Cheng-Lu Qin; Jie Tang; Meng Zhang; Min Du; Ke-Ke Xu; Jin-Qiu Shi
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X       Date:  2019-08-02

Review 5.  Identification of Genetic Causes in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) Syndrome: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Varvara Ermioni Triantafyllidi; Despoina Mavrogianni; Andreas Kalampalikis; Michael Litos; Stella Roidi; Lina Michala
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-27

6.  Molecular Actions Underlying Wolffian Duct Regression in Sexual Differentiation of Murine Reproductive Tracts.

Authors:  Fei Zhao; Sara A Grimm; Humphrey H-C Yao
Journal:  Sex Dev       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 1.824

Review 7.  Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome: a comprehensive update.

Authors:  Morten Krogh Herlin; Michael Bjørn Petersen; Mats Brännström
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 4.123

Review 8.  Studying Müllerian duct anomalies - from cataloguing phenotypes to discovering causation.

Authors:  Laura Santana González; Mara Artibani; Ahmed Ashour Ahmed
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 5.758

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.