Literature DB >> 25924205

A 2.5-million-year perspective on coarse-filter strategies for conserving nature's stage.

Jacquelyn L Gill1,2, Jessica L Blois3, Blas Benito4, Solomon Dobrowski5, Malcolm L Hunter6, Jenny L McGuire7.   

Abstract

Climate change will require novel conservation strategies. One such tactic is a coarse-filter approach that focuses on conserving nature's stage (CNS) rather than the actors (individual species). However, there is a temporal mismatch between the long-term goals of conservation and the short-term nature of most ecological studies, which leaves many assumptions untested. Paleoecology provides a valuable perspective on coarse-filter strategies by marshaling the natural experiments of the past to contextualize extinction risk due to the emerging impacts of climate change and anthropogenic threats. We reviewed examples from the paleoecological record that highlight the strengths, opportunities, and caveats of a CNS approach. We focused on the near-time geological past of the Quaternary, during which species were subjected to widespread changes in climate and concomitant changes in the physical environment in general. Species experienced a range of individualistic responses to these changes, including community turnover and novel associations, extinction and speciation, range shifts, changes in local richness and evenness, and both equilibrium and disequilibrium responses. Due to the dynamic nature of species responses to Quaternary climate change, a coarse-filter strategy may be appropriate for many taxa because it can accommodate dynamic processes. However, conservationists should also consider that the persistence of landforms varies across space and time, which could have potential long-term consequences for geodiversity and thus biodiversity.
© 2015 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cuaternario; Quaternary; biodiversidad; biodiversity; cambio climático; climate change; conservación del estado de la naturaleza; conserving nature's stage; facetas del suelo; geodiversidad; geodiversity; geomorfología; geomorphology; land facets; paleo-ecología; paleoecology

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25924205     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  6 in total

Review 1.  Biodiversity and Topographic Complexity: Modern and Geohistorical Perspectives.

Authors:  Catherine Badgley; Tara M Smiley; Rebecca Terry; Edward B Davis; Larisa R G DeSantis; David L Fox; Samantha S B Hopkins; Tereza Jezkova; Marjorie D Matocq; Nick Matzke; Jenny L McGuire; Andreas Mulch; Brett R Riddle; V Louise Roth; Joshua X Samuels; Caroline A E Strömberg; Brian J Yanites
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Insights from the past: unique opportunity or foreign country?

Authors:  Samuel T Turvey; Erin E Saupe
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Predicted rarity-weighted richness, a new tool to prioritize sites for species representation.

Authors:  Fábio Albuquerque; Paul Beier
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Species-free species distribution models describe macroecological properties of protected area networks.

Authors:  Jason L Robinson; James A Fordyce
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Towards connecting biodiversity and geodiversity across scales with satellite remote sensing.

Authors:  Phoebe L Zarnetske; Quentin D Read; Sydne Record; Keith D Gaddis; Stephanie Pau; Martina L Hobi; Sparkle L Malone; Jennifer Costanza; Kyla M Dahlin; Andrew M Latimer; Adam M Wilson; John M Grady; Scott V Ollinger; Andrew O Finley
Journal:  Glob Ecol Biogeogr       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 7.144

6.  Limited reciprocal surrogacy of bird and habitat diversity and inconsistencies in their representation in Romanian protected areas.

Authors:  Julia C Geue; Paula J Rotter; Caspar Gross; Zoltán Benkő; István Kovács; Ciprian Fântână; Judit Veres-Szászka; Cristi Domșa; Emanuel Baltag; Szilárd J Daróczi; Gábor M Bóné; Viorel D Popescu; Henri A Thomassen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.