Literature DB >> 25924182

Considerations in the use of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and confocal laser scanning microscopy to characterize rumen methanogens and define their spatial distributions.

Edith R Valle1, Gemma Henderson, Peter H Janssen, Faith Cox, Trevor W Alexander, Tim A McAllister.   

Abstract

In this study, methanogen-specific coenzyme F420 autofluorescence and confocal laser scanning microscopy were used to identify rumen methanogens and define their spatial distribution in free-living, biofilm-, and protozoa-associated microenvironments. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with temperature-controlled hybridization was used in an attempt to describe methanogen diversity. A heat pretreatment (65 °C, 1 h) was found to be a noninvasive method to increase probe access to methanogen RNA targets. Despite efforts to optimize FISH, 16S rRNA methanogen-specific probes, including Arch915, bound to some cells that lacked F420, possibly identifying uncharacterized Methanomassiliicoccales or reflecting nonspecific binding to other members of the rumen bacterial community. A probe targeting RNA from the methanogenesis-specific methyl coenzyme M reductase (mcr) gene was shown to detect cultured Methanosarcina cells with signal intensities comparable to those of 16S rRNA probes. However, the probe failed to hybridize with the majority of F420-emitting rumen methanogens, possibly because of differences in cell wall permeability among methanogen species. Methanogens were shown to integrate into microbial biofilms and to exist as ecto- and endosymbionts with rumen protozoa. Characterizing rumen methanogens and defining their spatial distribution may provide insight into mitigation strategies for ruminal methanogenesis.

Keywords:  FISH; biofilm; confocal laser; endosymbiont; endosymbiote; laser confocal; methanogens; méthanogènes; protozoa; protozoaire; rumen

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25924182     DOI: 10.1139/cjm-2014-0873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Microbiol        ISSN: 0008-4166            Impact factor:   2.419


  7 in total

Review 1.  Rumen methanogens and mitigation of methane emission by anti-methanogenic compounds and substances.

Authors:  Amlan Patra; Tansol Park; Minseok Kim; Zhongtang Yu
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2017-01-26

2.  Inhibition of the Rumen Ciliate Entodinium caudatum by Antibiotics.

Authors:  Tansol Park; Tea Meulia; Jeffrey L Firkins; Zhongtang Yu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  A Pine Enhanced Biochar Does Not Decrease Enteric CH4 Emissions, but Alters the Rumen Microbiota.

Authors:  Stephanie A Terry; Gabriel O Ribeiro; Robert J Gruninger; Alex V Chaves; Karen A Beauchemin; Erasmus Okine; Tim A McAllister
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-09-17

4.  Cross-reactivity of antibodies to different rumen methanogens demonstrated using immunomagnetic capture technology.

Authors:  Sofia Khanum; Joanna M Roberts; Rosemary W Heathcott; Stefanie Bagley; Tania Wilson; Sandeep K Gupta; Michelle R Kirk; Axel Heiser; Peter H Janssen; D Neil Wedlock
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 6.064

5.  Do Ruminal Ciliates Select Their Preys and Prokaryotic Symbionts?

Authors:  Tansol Park; Zhongtang Yu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  The transcriptome of the rumen ciliate Entodinium caudatum reveals some of its metabolic features.

Authors:  Lingling Wang; Anas Abu-Doleh; Johanna Plank; Umit V Catalyurek; Jeffrey L Firkins; Zhongtang Yu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 7.  Anaerobic Fungi: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Matthias Hess; Shyam S Paul; Anil K Puniya; Mark van der Giezen; Claire Shaw; Joan E Edwards; Kateřina Fliegerová
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.