Literature DB >> 25924074

Case studies of conservation plans that incorporate geodiversity.

M G Anderson1, P J Comer2, P Beier3, J J Lawler4, C A Schloss5, S Buttrick6, C M Albano7, D P Faith8.   

Abstract

Geodiversity has been used as a surrogate for biodiversity when species locations are unknown, and this utility can be extended to situations where species locations are in flux. Recently, scientists have designed conservation networks that aim to explicitly represent the range of geophysical environments, identifying a network of physical stages that could sustain biodiversity while allowing for change in species composition in response to climate change. Because there is no standard approach to designing such networks, we compiled 8 case studies illustrating a variety of ways scientists have approached the challenge. These studies show how geodiversity has been partitioned and used to develop site portfolios and connectivity designs; how geodiversity-based portfolios compare with those derived from species and communities; and how the selection and combination of variables influences the results. Collectively, they suggest 4 key steps when using geodiversity to augment traditional biodiversity-based conservation planning: create land units from species-relevant variables combined in an ecologically meaningful way; represent land units in a logical spatial configuration and integrate with species locations when possible; apply selection criteria to individual sites to ensure they are appropriate for conservation; and develop connectivity among sites to maintain movements and processes. With these considerations, conservationists can design more effective site portfolios to ensure the lasting conservation of biodiversity under a changing climate.
© 2015 Society for Conservation Biology.

Keywords:  abiotic surrogates; conservación del estado de la naturaleza; conservation planning; conserving nature's stage; geodiversidad; geodiversity; planeación de la conservación; sustituta abiótica

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25924074     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  3 in total

1.  Species-free species distribution models describe macroecological properties of protected area networks.

Authors:  Jason L Robinson; James A Fordyce
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Towards connecting biodiversity and geodiversity across scales with satellite remote sensing.

Authors:  Phoebe L Zarnetske; Quentin D Read; Sydne Record; Keith D Gaddis; Stephanie Pau; Martina L Hobi; Sparkle L Malone; Jennifer Costanza; Kyla M Dahlin; Andrew M Latimer; Adam M Wilson; John M Grady; Scott V Ollinger; Andrew O Finley
Journal:  Glob Ecol Biogeogr       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 7.144

3.  Biodiversity and ecosystem functions depend on environmental conditions and resources rather than the geodiversity of a tropical biodiversity hotspot.

Authors:  Christine I B Wallis; Yvonne C Tiede; Erwin Beck; Katrin Böhning-Gaese; Roland Brandl; David A Donoso; Carlos I Espinosa; Andreas Fries; Jürgen Homeier; Diego Inclan; Christoph Leuschner; Mark Maraun; Katrin Mikolajewski; Eike Lena Neuschulz; Stefan Scheu; Matthias Schleuning; Juan P Suárez; Boris A Tinoco; Nina Farwig; Jörg Bendix
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.