Literature DB >> 25923233

Money makes the (medical assessment) world go round: The cost of components of a summative final year Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE).

Craig Brown1, Sarah Ross1, Jennifer Cleland1, Kieran Walsh2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The widely used Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is undoubtedly expensive. Cost-effectiveness is one of the components of the assessment utility index defining its usefulness. Our current financial climate demands increased transparency in the costs associated with medical education and it is now vital to ascertain how much is spent on assessments, such as the OSCE, and in particular costs associated with the different types of stations within the OSCE.
METHODS: A retrospective case-study approach was used to identify all costs associated with the development, production, administration and post-examination phases of the 2013 final year MBChB OSCE at the University of Aberdeen, Scotland. This 15 station OSCE was held over 2 days for 185 students.
RESULTS: This OSCE cost £65,328 to run. Costs per station ranged from £3108 (prescribing) to £6577 (eye examination). The cost per student was £355. DISCUSSION: The costs of a "high stakes" OSCE are sobering. The bulk of costs identified are not modifiable in light of what is currently known about the metrics of OSCE utility, particularly reliability and validity.
CONCLUSION: Providers, and funders, of medical education must be prepared to assign significant resource to OSCE assessment and centres should be encouraged to calculate precise costs associated with assessment to inform resource allocation decisions.

Year:  2015        PMID: 25923233     DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1033389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  8 in total

1.  Perspective of junior doctors on the cost and value in e-learning.

Authors:  Kieran Walsh
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2018-11-29

2.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Performance Assessments: A Case Study of the Objective Structured Clinical Examination.

Authors:  Zhehan Jiang; Jinying Ouyang; Li Li; Yuting Han; Lingling Xu; Ren Liu; Junhua Sun
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2022-12

3.  Does selection pay off? A cost-benefit comparison of medical school selection and lottery systems.

Authors:  Sanne Schreurs; Jennifer Cleland; Arno M M Muijtjens; Mirjam G A Oude Egbrink; Kitty Cleutjens
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 6.251

4.  Entrustability levels of general internal medicine residents.

Authors:  Mostafa Dehghani Poudeh; Aeen Mohammadi; Rita Mojtahedzadeh; Nikoo Yamani
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Early Pre-clerkship Clinical Skills Assessments Predict Clerkship Performance.

Authors:  Lindsay C Strowd; Hong Gao; Donna M Williams; Timothy R Peters; Jennifer Jackson
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2022-03-01

6.  How well do final year undergraduate medical students master practical clinical skills?

Authors:  Sylvère Störmann; Melanie Stankiewicz; Patricia Raes; Christina Berchtold; Yvonne Kosanke; Gabrielle Illes; Peter Loose; Matthias W Angstwurm
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2016-08-15

7.  Issues of cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness for simulation in health professions education.

Authors:  Stephen Maloney; Terry Haines
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2016-05-17

8.  "You can't always get what you want…": economic thinking, constrained optimization and health professions education.

Authors:  J A Cleland; J Foo; D Ilic; S Maloney; Y You
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.853

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.