Literature DB >> 25922982

The effectiveness of marine reserve systems constructed using different surrogates of biodiversity.

P R Sutcliffe1, C J Klein1, C R Pitcher2, H P Possingham1.   

Abstract

Biological sampling in marine systems is often limited, and the cost of acquiring new data is high. We sought to assess whether systematic reserves designed using abiotic domains adequately conserve a comprehensive range of species in a tropical marine inter-reef system. We based our assessment on data from the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. We designed reserve systems aiming to conserve 30% of each species based on 4 abiotic surrogate types (abiotic domains; weighted abiotic domains; pre-defined bioregions; and random selection of areas). We evaluated each surrogate in scenarios with and without cost (cost to fishery) and clumping (size of conservation area) constraints. To measure the efficacy of each reserve system for conservation purposes, we evaluated how well 842 species collected at 1155 sites across the Great Barrier Reef seabed were represented in each reserve system. When reserve design included both cost and clumping constraints, the mean proportion of species reaching the conservation target was 20-27% higher for reserve systems that were biologically informed than reserves designed using unweighted environmental data. All domains performed substantially better than random, except when there were no spatial or economic constraints placed on the system design. Under the scenario with no constraints, the mean proportion of species reaching the conservation target ranged from 98.5% to 99.99% across all surrogate domains, whereas the range was 90-96% across all domains when both cost and clumping were considered. This proportion did not change considerably between scenarios where one constraint was imposed and scenarios where both cost and clumping constraints were considered. We conclude that representative reserve systems can be designed using abiotic domains; however, there are substantial benefits if some biological information is incorporated.
© 2015 Society for Conservation Biology.

Keywords:  abiotic domain; conservar el estado de la naturaleza; conservation planning; conserving nature's stage; diseño de reservas; dominio abiótico; inter-reef seabed; lecho marino inter-arrecifal; planeación de la conservación; reserve design

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25922982     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  6 in total

1.  Modeling demersal fish and benthic invertebrate assemblages in support of marine conservation planning.

Authors:  John M O'Brien; Ryan R E Stanley; Nicholas W Jeffery; Susan G Heaslip; Claudio DiBacco; Zeliang Wang
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 6.105

2.  Improving spatial prioritisation for remote marine regions: optimising biodiversity conservation and sustainable development trade-offs.

Authors:  Cordelia H Moore; Ben T Radford; Hugh P Possingham; Andrew J Heyward; Romola R Stewart; Matthew E Watts; Jim Prescott; Stephen J Newman; Euan S Harvey; Rebecca Fisher; Clay W Bryce; Ryan J Lowe; Oliver Berry; Alexis Espinosa-Gayosso; Errol Sporer; Thor Saunders
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Factoring economic costs into conservation planning may not improve agreement over priorities for protection.

Authors:  Paul R Armsworth; Heather B Jackson; Seong-Hoon Cho; Melissa Clark; Joseph E Fargione; Gwenllian D Iacona; Taeyoung Kim; Eric R Larson; Thomas Minney; Nathan A Sutton
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 17.694

4.  A strategy for the conservation of biodiversity on mid-ocean ridges from deep-sea mining.

Authors:  Daniel C Dunn; Cindy L Van Dover; Ron J Etter; Craig R Smith; Lisa A Levin; Telmo Morato; Ana Colaço; Andrew C Dale; Andrey V Gebruk; Kristina M Gjerde; Patrick N Halpin; Kerry L Howell; David Johnson; José Angel A Perez; Marta Chantal Ribeiro; Heiko Stuckas; Philip Weaver
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 14.136

5.  The role of rarity as a surrogate of marine fish species representation.

Authors:  Fabio Albuquerque; Yaiyr Astudillo-Scalia
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Evaluating surrogates of genetic diversity for conservation planning.

Authors:  Jeffrey O Hanson; Ana Veríssimo; Guillermo Velo-Antón; Adam Marques; Miguel Camacho-Sanchez; Íñigo Martínez-Solano; Helena Gonçalves; Fernando Sequeira; Hugh P Possingham; Silvia B Carvalho
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 6.560

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.