Literature DB >> 25922899

The theory behind, and the challenges of, conserving nature's stage in a time of rapid change.

Joshua J Lawler1, David D Ackerly2, Christine M Albano3, Mark G Anderson4, Solomon Z Dobrowski5, Jacquelyn L Gill6, Nicole E Heller7, Robert L Pressey8, Eric W Sanderson9, Stuart B Weiss10.   

Abstract

Most conservation planning to date has focused on protecting today's biodiversity with the assumption that it will be tomorrow's biodiversity. However, modern climate change has already resulted in distributional shifts of some species and is projected to result in many more shifts in the coming decades. As species redistribute and biotic communities reorganize, conservation plans based on current patterns of biodiversity may fail to adequately protect species in the future. One approach for addressing this issue is to focus on conserving a range of abiotic conditions in the conservation-planning process. By doing so, it may be possible to conserve an abiotically diverse "stage" upon which evolution will play out and support many actors (biodiversity). We reviewed the fundamental underpinnings of the concept of conserving the abiotic stage, starting with the early observations of von Humboldt, who mapped the concordance of abiotic conditions and vegetation, and progressing to the concept of the ecological niche. We discuss challenges posed by issues of spatial and temporal scale, the role of biotic drivers of species distributions, and latitudinal and topographic variation in relationships between climate and landform. For example, abiotic conditions are not static, but change through time-albeit at different and often relatively slow rates. In some places, biotic interactions play a substantial role in structuring patterns of biodiversity, meaning that patterns of biodiversity may be less tightly linked to the abiotic stage. Furthermore, abiotic drivers of biodiversity can change with latitude and topographic position, meaning that the abiotic stage may need to be defined differently in different places. We conclude that protecting a diversity of abiotic conditions will likely best conserve biodiversity into the future in places where abiotic drivers of species distributions are strong relative to biotic drivers, where the diversity of abiotic settings will be conserved through time, and where connectivity allows for movement among areas providing different abiotic conditions.
© 2015 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abiotic factors; cambio climático; climate change; condiciones abióticas; conservation planning; ecological theory; planses de conservación; teoría ecolótigico

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25922899     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  16 in total

1.  A Geographic Mosaic of Climate Change Impacts on Terrestrial Vegetation: Which Areas Are Most at Risk?

Authors:  David D Ackerly; William K Cornwell; Stuart B Weiss; Lorraine E Flint; Alan L Flint
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Climate change velocity underestimates climate change exposure in mountainous regions.

Authors:  Solomon Z Dobrowski; Sean A Parks
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Predicted rarity-weighted richness, a new tool to prioritize sites for species representation.

Authors:  Fábio Albuquerque; Paul Beier
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  An empirical, hierarchical typology of tree species assemblages for assessing forest dynamics under global change scenarios.

Authors:  Jennifer K Costanza; John W Coulston; David N Wear
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Global patterns of protection of elevational gradients in mountain ranges.

Authors:  Paul R Elsen; William B Monahan; Adina M Merenlender
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Towards connecting biodiversity and geodiversity across scales with satellite remote sensing.

Authors:  Phoebe L Zarnetske; Quentin D Read; Sydne Record; Keith D Gaddis; Stephanie Pau; Martina L Hobi; Sparkle L Malone; Jennifer Costanza; Kyla M Dahlin; Andrew M Latimer; Adam M Wilson; John M Grady; Scott V Ollinger; Andrew O Finley
Journal:  Glob Ecol Biogeogr       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 7.144

Review 7.  Conservation in the face of climate change: recent developments.

Authors:  Joshua Lawler; James Watson; Edward Game
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2015-10-28

8.  Ecologically-Relevant Maps of Landforms and Physiographic Diversity for Climate Adaptation Planning.

Authors:  David M Theobald; Dylan Harrison-Atlas; William B Monahan; Christine M Albano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effects of topoclimatic complexity on the composition of woody plant communities.

Authors:  Meagan F Oldfather; Matthew N Britton; Prahlad D Papper; Michael J Koontz; Michelle M Halbur; Celeste Dodge; Alan L Flint; Lorriane E Flint; David D Ackerly
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.276

10.  Northern protected areas will become important refuges for biodiversity tracking suitable climates.

Authors:  Dominique Berteaux; Marylène Ricard; Martin-Hugues St-Laurent; Nicolas Casajus; Catherine Périé; Frieda Beauregard; Sylvie de Blois
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.