Literature DB >> 25922285

Is there any advantage in placing an additional calcar screw in locked nailing of proximal humeral fractures?

J C Katthagen1, M Schwarze2, L Bauer3, J Meyer-Kobbe3, C Voigt3, C Hurschler2, H Lill3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical effect of an additional unlocked calcar screw compared to a standard setting with three proximal humeral head screws alone for fixation of an unstable 2-part fracture of the surgical neck. HYPOTHESIS: The additional calcar screw improves stiffness and failure load.
METHODS: Fourteen fresh frozen humeri were randomized into two equal sized groups. An unstable 2-part fracture of the surgical neck was simulated and all specimens were fixed with the MultiLoc(®)-nail. Group I represented a basic screw setup, with three locked head screws and two unlocked shaft screws. Group II was identical with a supplemental unlocked calcar screw (CS). Stiffness tests were performed in torsional loading, as well as in axial and in 20° abduction/20° adduction modes. Subsequently cyclic loading and load-to-failure tests were performed. Resulting stiffness, displacement under cyclic load and ultimate load were compared between groups using the t-test for independent variables (α=0.05).
RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between the groups in any of the biomechanical parameters. Backing out of the CS was observed in three cases. DISCUSSION: The use of an additional unlocked calcar screw does not provide mechanical benefit in locked nailing of an unstable 2-part fracture of the surgical neck.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Calcar screw; Fracture; Locked nail; MultiLoc(®); Proximal humerus

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25922285     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.01.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  3 in total

1.  Biomechanical evaluation of straight antegrade nailing in proximal humeral fractures: the rationale of the "proximal anchoring point".

Authors:  Simon A Euler; Maximilian Petri; Melanie B Venderley; Grant J Dornan; Werner Schmoelz; Travis Lee Turnbull; Michael Plecko; Franz S Kralinger; Peter J Millett
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Predictive Indicators for Complications of Proximal Humerus Fractures Treated with Locking Plate or Intramedullary Nail Fixation.

Authors:  Hanzhou Wang; Yang Liu; Dong Wang; Yuanming He; Peifeng Yao; Tianchao Lu; Junlin Zhou
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Biomechanical evaluation of hybrid double plate osteosynthesis using a locking plate and an inverted third tubular plate for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Jan Theopold; Stefan Schleifenbaum; Mirijam Müller; Michael Werner; Niels Hammer; Christoph Josten; Pierre Hepp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.