Literature DB >> 25922251

Prospective, randomized comparison of 2 methods of cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps.

Akira Horiuchi1, Kenji Hosoi2, Masashi Kajiyama1, Naoki Tanaka1, Kenji Sano3, David Y Graham4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Both cold-only snare and hot polypectomy snare are used for the removal of small colorectal polyps.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of cold snare polypectomy of small colorectal polyps with a snare exclusively designed as a cold snare versus cold snare polypectomy by using a traditional polypectomy snare.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled study.
SETTING: Municipal hospital in Japan.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients with colorectal polyps 10 mm or smaller in diameter were randomized to dedicated cold snare (dedicated cold snare group) or traditional cold snare (traditional cold snare group). The primary outcome measure was complete resection rates by cold snaring based on pathological examination. Secondary outcomes included bleeding within 2 weeks after polypectomy and identification of submucosal arteries and injured arteries in the resected specimens.
RESULTS: Seventy-six patients having 210 eligible polyps were randomized: dedicated cold snare group, N = 37 (98 polyps) and traditional cold snare group, N = 39 (112 polyps). Patient demographic characteristics including the number, size, and shape of the polyps removed were similar in the 2 groups. The complete resection rate was significantly greater with the dedicated cold than with the traditional cold snare (91% [89/98] vs 79% [88/112], P = .015), with a marked difference with 8- to 10-mm polyps, both flat and pedunculated. Immediate bleeding and hematochezia rates were similar (19% vs 21%, P = .86; 5.4% vs 7.7%, P = .69). No delayed bleeding occurred. Histology demonstrated a similar prevalence of arteries and injured arteries in the submucosa (33% [32/96] vs 30% [31/104], P = .59; 3.1% [3/96] vs 6.7% [7/104], P = .24). LIMITATIONS: Small sample size, single-center study.
CONCLUSION: Polypectomy by using a dedicated cold snare resulted in complete polyp removal more often than did cold snaring with a traditional snare, especially polyps 8 to 10 mm in diameter, whether flat or pedunculated. ( CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02036047.)
Copyright © 2015 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25922251     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  29 in total

1.  Feasibility of cold snare polypectomy in Japan: A pilot study.

Authors:  Yoji Takeuchi; Takeshi Yamashina; Noriko Matsuura; Takashi Ito; Mototsugu Fujii; Kengo Nagai; Fumi Matsui; Tomofumi Akasaka; Noboru Hanaoka; Koji Higashino; Hiroyasu Iishi; Ryu Ishihara; Henrik Thorlacius; Noriya Uedo
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-11-25

2.  Meaningless comparison of resection depth between cold snare polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection.

Authors:  Mitsunobu Matsushita; Akiyoshi Nishio; Kazuichi Okazaki
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 7.527

3.  Pushing the Limit: How to Get the Most Out of Cold Snares.

Authors:  Daniel von Renteln; Heiko Pohl
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Comparative efficacy of cold polypectomy techniques for diminutive colorectal polyps: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yoon Suk Jung; Chan Hyuk Park; Eunwoo Nam; Chang Soo Eun; Dong Il Park; Dong Soo Han
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Adoption of Optimal Small (6-9 mm) Colorectal Polyp Resection Technique Over Time.

Authors:  Larissa Muething; Bill Quach; Derek E Smith; Dexiang Gao; Joshua A Smith; Robert T Simril; Amanda Tompkins; Jeannine Espinoza; Michelle L Cowan; Hazem Hammad; Sachin Wani; Swati G Patel
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Effect of cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Qing-Qing Meng; Min Rao; Pu-Jun Gao
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 1.534

7.  Polyp Resection and Removal Procedures: Insights From the 2017 Digestive Disease Week.

Authors:  Carol Burke; Vivek Kaul; Heiko Pohl
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2017-09

8.  Underwater versus conventional endoscopic resection of nondiminutive nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: a prospective randomized controlled trial (with video).

Authors:  Andrew W Yen; Joseph W Leung; Machelle D Wilson; Felix W Leung
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Dedicated Cold Snare vs. Traditional Snare for Polypectomy of Diminutive and Small Lesions in a Porcine Model: A Research Group for Endoscopic Instruments and Stents (REIS) Study.

Authors:  Han Hee Lee; Bo-In Lee; Jung-Wook Kim; Hyun Lim; Si Hyung Lee; Jun-Hyung Cho; Yunho Jung; Kyoung Oh Kim; Chan Gyoo Kim; Kee Myung Lee; Jong-Jae Park; Myung-Gyu Choi; Hoon Jai Chun; Ho Gak Kim
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2020-09-10

10.  Endoscopic polypectomy devices.

Authors:  Vinay Chandrasekhara; Nikhil A Kumta; Barham K Abu Dayyeh; Manoop S Bhutani; Pichamol Jirapinyo; Kumar Krishnan; John T Maple; Joshua Melson; Rahul Pannala; Mansour A Parsi; Amrita Sethi; Guru Trikudanathan; Arvind J Trindade; David R Lichtenstein
Journal:  VideoGIE       Date:  2021-04-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.