| Literature DB >> 25921832 |
Matt J Silver1, Karen D Corbin1, Garrett Hellenthal1, Kerry-Ann da Costa1, Paula Dominguez-Salas1, Sophie E Moore1, Jennifer Owen1, Andrew M Prentice1, Branwen J Hennig1, Steven H Zeisel2.
Abstract
Choline is an essential nutrient, and the amount needed in the diet is modulated by several factors. Given geographical differences in dietary choline intake and disparate frequencies of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in choline metabolism genes between ethnic groups, we tested the hypothesis that 3 SNPs that increase dependence on dietary choline would be under negative selection pressure in settings where choline intake is low: choline dehydrogenase (CHDH) rs12676, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 1 (MTHFD1) rs2236225, and phosphatidylethanolamine-N-methyltransferase (PEMT) rs12325817. Evidence of negative selection was assessed in 2 populations: one in The Gambia, West Africa, where there is historic evidence of a choline-poor diet, and the other in the United States, with a comparatively choline-rich diet. We used 2 independent methods, and confirmation of our hypothesis was sought via a comparison with SNP data from the Maasai, an East African population with a genetic background similar to that of Gambians but with a traditional diet that is higher in choline. Our results show that frequencies of SNPs known to increase dependence on dietary choline are significantly reduced in the low-choline setting of The Gambia. Our findings suggest that adequate intake levels of choline may have to be reevaluated in different ethnic groups and highlight a possible approach for identifying novel functional SNPs under the influence of dietary selective pressure.Entities:
Keywords: adequate intake levels; choline dehydrogenase; diet and selection; methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase; phosphatidylethanolamine-N-methyltransferase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25921832 PMCID: PMC4511208 DOI: 10.1096/fj.15-271056
Source DB: PubMed Journal: FASEB J ISSN: 0892-6638 Impact factor: 5.191
Figure 1.Metabolic pathways modulated by CHDH, PEMT, and MTHFD1. Choline is oxidized to form betaine by CHDH. Betaine is used as a methyl donor in the formation of methionine. MTHFD catalyzes the formation of methyltetrahydrofolate, which is an alternative methyl donor in the formation of methionine. Methionine is used to form S-adenosylmethionine, which is necessary in the methylation of phosphatidylethanolamine to form phosphatidylcholine. Genetic polymorphisms in CHDH, PEMT, and MTHFD1 increase dependence on dietary choline by modulating the formation of choline and its utilization as a methyl donor.
Pairwise r2 coefficients for 3 CD SNPs in each cohort
| SNPs | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| rs12325817 | 0.020 | 0.024 | 0.003 |
| rs2236225, rs12676 | 0.008 | 0.006 | 0.028 |
| rs12325817 | 0.003 | 0.000 | 0.005 |
MKK imputed allele.
Figure 2.Cross-cohort comparisons confirm that GAM and MKK individuals are more closely related genetically than are EUR individuals. Plots illustrate the first 2 principal components from (A–C) 1-, (E–G) 2-, or (D) 3-cohort PCAs. PCAs illustrate interindividual differences at 144 SNPs across the 3 cohorts.
Figure 3.Cross-cohort MAF distributions illustrate MAF differences at CD SNPs compared to genetic background. MAF comparisons are shown for (A) GAM vs. EUR, (C) GAM vs. MKK, and (E) MKK vs. EUR. Note that the minor allele is defined for the EUR cohort, so that, in the top and bottom plots, the EUR MAF, mEUR ≤ 0.5 for all SNPs, and the possible change in MAF for SNP j in the non-EUR cohort ranges from −0.5 to 1. SNPs with reduced MAF in (A, C) GAM and (E) MKK are located to the left of the dashed black line of parity. These include the 3 CD SNPs (filled circles). B, D, F) distribution of MAF differences, δm for each cross-cohort comparison. In each case, δm is defined as the SNP MAF in the cohort on the y-axis subtracted from the SNP MAF for the cohort on the x-axis. Solid black vertical lines illustrate δm for the 3 CD SNPs.
Minor allele frequencies at 3 CD SNPs in the GAM, MKK, and EUR cohorts
| SNPs | Minor (major) allele from EUR data | MAF_GAM | MAF_MKK | MAF_EUR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs12676 | T(G) | 0.09 | 0.23 | 0.29 |
| rs2236225 | A(G) | 0.18 | 0.40 | 0.46 |
| rs12325817 | C(G) | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.43 |
MKK-imputed allele.
Reported based on the reverse genome strand, because these genes are transcribed from that strand (dbSNP build 141).
Statistical tests for evidence of negative selection at 3 CD SNPs, according to cross-cohort comparison method 1
| Comparison | Null hypothesis tested | SNPs tested
( | Unadjusted | Variance-adjusted
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GAM | CD SNP MAFs are not significantly reduced in GAM compared with EUR | 174 | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| GAM | CD SNP MAFs are not significantly reduced in GAM compared with MKK | 149 | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| MKK | CD SNP MAFs are not significantly reduced in MKK compared with EUR | 141 | 0.03 | 0.04 |
Statistical tests for evidence of negative selection at 3 CD SNPs, according to population genetic model-based method 2
| Comparison | Null hypothesis tested | SNPs tested
( | Permutation
|
|---|---|---|---|
| GAM | CD SNP MAFs are not significantly reduced in GAM compared with EUR and MKK | 144 | 0.008 |
| MKK | CD SNP MAFs are not significantly reduced in MKK compared with EUR and GAM | 144 | 0.7 |