Literature DB >> 25921824

Risk Factors of Membrane Perforation and Postoperative Complications in Sinus Floor Elevation Surgery: Review of 407 Augmentation Procedures.

Linda Schwarz1, Vanessa Schiebel1, Markus Hof2, Christian Ulm3, Georg Watzek4, Bernhard Pommer5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To test patient- and sinus-related risk factors for an association with intraoperative membrane perforation and postoperative complications after sinus floor augmentation surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sinus floor elevation procedures using a lateral approach were retrospectively analyzed for patients' medical history and sinus anatomy on computed tomographic scans. Complications per sinus after membrane elevation and augmentation using a mixture of autologous bone and deproteinized bovine bone substitute (Bio-Oss) were recorded. Logic regression (adjusted using the generalized estimation equation approach) was performed to analyze the influence of patient age, gender, smoking habits, sinus septa, residual bone height, and mesiodistal elevation width.
RESULTS: Of 407 sinus grafts in 300 patients (mean age, 56 yr), perforation of the Schneiderian membrane occurred in 35 sinuses (8.6%) and was significantly associated to the presence of sinus septa (odds ratio [OR] = 4.8; P = .002) and decreased residual bone height (OR = 0.01; P < .001). Smoking increased the risk of membrane perforation (OR = 4.8; P = .002), sinusitis (OR = 12.3; P < .001), and wound dehiscence (OR = 16.1; P = .005). Cases of sinus membrane perforation had higher odds for postoperative sinusitis (OR = 10.5; P < .001). The probability of wound dehiscence increased with the size of the elevated area (OR = 3; P < .001).
CONCLUSION: The results of the study suggest that the presence of sinus septa and residual bone height less than 3.5 mm are the main risk factors increasing sinus membrane perforation rates. There was a higher prevalence for sinusitis in cases of membrane perforation (31.4%) despite intraoperative closure with resorbable membranes (Bio-Guide). Smokers generally exhibited greater chances for complications.
Copyright © 2015 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25921824     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.01.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  17 in total

1.  [Comparison of stripping of steep sheep maxillary sinus mucosal with new-type memory elastic silk sleeve stripper and umbrella stripper].

Authors:  Chang-Jian Li; Yuan Lü; Yan-Feng Li; Jia-Dong Fan; Le Liu; Yue Zhang
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2018-10-01

Review 2.  Short implants versus bone grafting and standard-length implants placement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Juan A V Palacios; Jaime Jiménez Garcia; João M M Caramês; Marc Quirynen; Duarte Nuno da Silva Marques
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Prevalence and anatomical variations of maxillary sinus septa: A cone-beam computed tomography analysis.

Authors:  Farida Abesi; Samaneh Motaharinia; Ehsan Moudi; Sina Haghanifar; Soraya Khafri
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2022-09-01

Review 4.  Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation: a Review of Selected Treatment Modalities.

Authors:  Thomas Starch-Jensen; Janek Dalsgaard Jensen
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2017-09-30

5.  Morphometric analysis of sinus depth in the posterior maxilla and proposal of a novel classification.

Authors:  Florian Wagner; Gabriella Dvorak; Stefan Nemec; Peter Pietschmann; Hannes Traxler; Kurt Schicho; Rudolf Seemann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Complications During Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Associated with Interfering Septa: A New Classification of Septa.

Authors:  Tassos Irinakis; Valentin Dabuleanu; Salwa Aldahlawi
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2017-03-22

Review 7.  Influence of exposing dental implants into the sinus cavity on survival and complications rate: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gian Maria Ragucci; Basel Elnayef; Fernando Suárez-López Del Amo; Hom-Lay Wang; Federico Hernández-Alfaro; Jordi Gargallo-Albiol
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2019-02-05

Review 8.  Management of Schneiderian membrane perforations during maxillary sinus floor augmentation with lateral approach in relation to subsequent implant survival rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Luis Alfredo Díaz-Olivares; Jorge Cortés-Bretón Brinkmann; Natalia Martínez-Rodríguez; José María Martínez-González; Juan López-Quiles; Isabel Leco-Berrocal; Cristina Meniz-García
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-07-12

Review 9.  What is the frequency of anatomical variations and pathological findings in maxillary sinuses among patients subjected to maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography? A systematic review.

Authors:  J Ata-Ali; J-V Diago-Vilalta; M Melo; L Bagán; M-C Soldini; C Di-Nardo; F Ata-Ali; J-F Mañes-Ferrer
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2017-07-01

10.  Management of Schneiderian Membrane Perforations during Sinus Augmentation Procedures: A Preliminary Comparison of Two Different Approaches.

Authors:  Horia Mihail Barbu; Stefania Andrada Iancu; Iasmin Jarjour Mirea; Michele Davide Mignogna; Nachum Samet; José Luis Calvo-Guirado
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.