Sally Ozonoff1, Gregory S Young1, Rebecca J Landa2, Jessica Brian3, Susan Bryson4, Tony Charman5, Katarzyna Chawarska6, Suzanne L Macari6, Daniel Messinger7, Wendy L Stone8, Lonnie Zwaigenbaum9, Ana-Maria Iosif10. 1. MIND Institute, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA. 2. Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA. 3. Bloorview Research Institute, University of Toronto, ON, Canada. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada. 5. Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, UK. 6. Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. 7. Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA. 8. Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 9. Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. 10. Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) made before age 3 has been found to be remarkably stable in clinic- and community-ascertained samples. The stability of an ASD diagnosis in prospectively ascertained samples of infants at risk for ASD due to familial factors has not yet been studied, however. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends intensive surveillance and screening for this high-risk group, which may afford earlier identification. Therefore, it is critical to understand the stability of an ASD diagnosis made before age 3 in young children at familial risk. METHODS: Data were pooled across seven sites of the Baby Siblings Research Consortium. Evaluations of 418 later-born siblings of children with ASD were conducted at 18, 24, and 36 months of age and a clinical diagnosis of ASD or Not ASD was made at each age. RESULTS: The stability of an ASD diagnosis at 18 months was 93% and at 24 months was 82%. There were relatively few children diagnosed with ASD at 18 or 24 months whose diagnosis was not confirmed at 36 months. There were, however, many children with ASD outcomes at 36 months who had not yet been diagnosed at 18 months (63%) or 24 months (41%). CONCLUSIONS: The stability of an ASD diagnosis in this familial-risk sample was high at both 18 and 24 months of age and comparable with previous data from clinic- and community-ascertained samples. However, almost half of the children with ASD outcomes were not identified as being on the spectrum at 24 months and did not receive an ASD diagnosis until 36 months. Thus, longitudinal follow-up is critical for children with early signs of social-communication difficulties, even if they do not meet diagnostic criteria at initial assessment. A public health implication of these data is that screening for ASD may need to be repeated multiple times in the first years of life. These data also suggest that there is a period of early development in which ASD features unfold and emerge but have not yet reached levels supportive of a diagnosis.
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) made before age 3 has been found to be remarkably stable in clinic- and community-ascertained samples. The stability of an ASD diagnosis in prospectively ascertained samples of infants at risk for ASD due to familial factors has not yet been studied, however. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends intensive surveillance and screening for this high-risk group, which may afford earlier identification. Therefore, it is critical to understand the stability of an ASD diagnosis made before age 3 in young children at familial risk. METHODS: Data were pooled across seven sites of the Baby Siblings Research Consortium. Evaluations of 418 later-born siblings of children with ASD were conducted at 18, 24, and 36 months of age and a clinical diagnosis of ASD or Not ASD was made at each age. RESULTS: The stability of an ASD diagnosis at 18 months was 93% and at 24 months was 82%. There were relatively few children diagnosed with ASD at 18 or 24 months whose diagnosis was not confirmed at 36 months. There were, however, many children with ASD outcomes at 36 months who had not yet been diagnosed at 18 months (63%) or 24 months (41%). CONCLUSIONS: The stability of an ASD diagnosis in this familial-risk sample was high at both 18 and 24 months of age and comparable with previous data from clinic- and community-ascertained samples. However, almost half of the children with ASD outcomes were not identified as being on the spectrum at 24 months and did not receive an ASD diagnosis until 36 months. Thus, longitudinal follow-up is critical for children with early signs of social-communication difficulties, even if they do not meet diagnostic criteria at initial assessment. A public health implication of these data is that screening for ASD may need to be repeated multiple times in the first years of life. These data also suggest that there is a period of early development in which ASD features unfold and emerge but have not yet reached levels supportive of a diagnosis.
Authors: Catherine Lord; Eva Petkova; Vanessa Hus; Weijin Gan; Feihan Lu; Donna M Martin; Opal Ousley; Lisa Guy; Raphael Bernier; Jennifer Gerdts; Molly Algermissen; Agnes Whitaker; James S Sutcliffe; Zachary Warren; Ami Klin; Celine Saulnier; Ellen Hanson; Rachel Hundley; Judith Piggot; Eric Fombonne; Mandy Steiman; Judith Miles; Stephen M Kanne; Robin P Goin-Kochel; Sarika U Peters; Edwin H Cook; Stephen Guter; Jennifer Tjernagel; Lee Anne Green-Snyder; Somer Bishop; Amy Esler; Katherine Gotham; Rhiannon Luyster; Fiona Miller; Jennifer Olson; Jennifer Richler; Susan Risi Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2011-11-07
Authors: Sally Ozonoff; Gregory S Young; Alice Carter; Daniel Messinger; Nurit Yirmiya; Lonnie Zwaigenbaum; Susan Bryson; Leslie J Carver; John N Constantino; Karen Dobkins; Ted Hutman; Jana M Iverson; Rebecca Landa; Sally J Rogers; Marian Sigman; Wendy L Stone Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2011-08-15 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Danilo R Moura; Jaderson C Costa; Iná S Santos; Aluísio J D Barros; Alicia Matijasevich; Ricardo Halpern; Samuel Dumith; Simone Karam; Fernando C Barros Journal: J Paediatr Child Health Date: 2010-04-16 Impact factor: 1.954
Authors: Emma van Daalen; Chantal Kemner; Claudine Dietz; Sophie H N Swinkels; Jan K Buitelaar; Herman van Engeland Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2009-05-07 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Amy S Weitlauf; Alison C Vehorn; Wendy L Stone; Deborah Fein; Zachary E Warren Journal: J Dev Behav Pediatr Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 2.225
Authors: Tony Charman; Gregory S Young; Jessica Brian; Alice Carter; Leslie J Carver; Katarzyna Chawarska; Suzanne Curtin; Karen Dobkins; Mayada Elsabbagh; Stelios Georgiades; Irva Hertz-Picciotto; Ted Hutman; Jana M Iverson; Emily J Jones; Rebecca Landa; Suzanne Macari; Daniel S Messinger; Charles A Nelson; Sally Ozonoff; Celine Saulnier; Wendy L Stone; Helen Tager-Flusberg; Sara Jane Webb; Nurit Yirmiya; Lonnie Zwaigenbaum Journal: Autism Res Date: 2016-07-15 Impact factor: 5.216
Authors: Meagan R Talbott; Sarah Dufek; Lonnie Zwaigenbaum; Susan Bryson; Jessica Brian; Isabel M Smith; Sally J Rogers Journal: J Autism Dev Disord Date: 2020-09