BACKGROUND: Much attention has been paid to neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) as a new strategy especially for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC). However, the optimal indication of NAT remains undetermined. METHODS: We analyzed 248 patients with pancreatic cancer (PC). One hundred resectable tumors were classified as R group. Sixty-nine tumors with venous involvement were classified as BR-P group, while 31 tumors with arterial involvement were classified as BR-A group. Ninety-nine patients received NAT. Furthermore, 48 unresectable locally advanced PC served as controls (LAPC group). Among them, 11 patients received adjuvant surgery afterwards (Ad-surg group). RESULTS: The overall median survival time in the R, BR-P and BR-A groups was 45.3, 24.8 and 16.8 months. In the R and BR-P groups, patients treated with NAT had a better prognosis than those without. In contrast, NAT had no impact on prognosis in the BR-A group. Patients treated with NAT in the BR-P, but not BR-A group, had a better prognosis than patients in the LAPC group. Furthermore, patients in the Ad-surg group had a significantly better prognosis than patients in the BR-A group. CONCLUSIONS: Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer with venous involvement, but without arterial involvement, may be a good indication for NAT. Our data highlight the importance of preoperative resectability assessment to evaluate the indication and efficacy of NAT.
BACKGROUND: Much attention has been paid to neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) as a new strategy especially for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC). However, the optimal indication of NAT remains undetermined. METHODS: We analyzed 248 patients with pancreatic cancer (PC). One hundred resectable tumors were classified as R group. Sixty-nine tumors with venous involvement were classified as BR-P group, while 31 tumors with arterial involvement were classified as BR-A group. Ninety-nine patients received NAT. Furthermore, 48 unresectable locally advanced PC served as controls (LAPC group). Among them, 11 patients received adjuvant surgery afterwards (Ad-surg group). RESULTS: The overall median survival time in the R, BR-P and BR-A groups was 45.3, 24.8 and 16.8 months. In the R and BR-P groups, patients treated with NAT had a better prognosis than those without. In contrast, NAT had no impact on prognosis in the BR-A group. Patients treated with NAT in the BR-P, but not BR-A group, had a better prognosis than patients in the LAPC group. Furthermore, patients in the Ad-surg group had a significantly better prognosis than patients in the BR-A group. CONCLUSIONS: Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer with venous involvement, but without arterial involvement, may be a good indication for NAT. Our data highlight the importance of preoperative resectability assessment to evaluate the indication and efficacy of NAT.
Authors: E Versteijne; J A Vogel; M G Besselink; O R C Busch; J W Wilmink; J G Daams; C H J van Eijck; B Groot Koerkamp; C R N Rasch; G van Tienhoven Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2018-04-30 Impact factor: 6.939