Alain Toledano1, Elisabeth Luporsi2, Jean François Morere3, Florian Scotté4, Kamel Laribi5, Jérôme Barrière6, Philippe Huot-Marchand7, Ladan Duvillié8, Victor Hugo Concas8, Roland Bugat9. 1. American Hospital of Paris, 63, Bd Victor Hugo, 92200, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France. alain.toledano@ahparis.org. 2. Centre Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France. 3. Hôpital Avicenne, Bobigny, France. 4. Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Paris, France. 5. Centre Hospitalier Le Mans Cedex 9, Le Mans, France. 6. Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France. 7. ICTA, Fontaine-les-Dijon, France. 8. Vifor Pharma, Neuilly-sur-Seine Cedex, France. 9. Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study collected data on the use of ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) in a cancer patient population in France to evaluate the feasibility and the conditions of use of FCM in routine clinical practice beyond the limiting criteria of clinical trials. METHODS: This observational, prospective study of patients with a solid tumour or a haematological malignancy who have received treatment with FCM after 01 July 2011 evaluated data about the circumstances of iron administration, concomitant medication and laboratory tests in the period from 3 months prior to the first FCM administration (baseline) until 3 months post-baseline. RESULTS: Data from 367 FCM-treated patients were analysed. FCM was mainly given as a single dose at baseline (69.2%) and without additional erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA, 64.3%). The median total iron dose was 1000 mg per patient. Median haemoglobin (Hb) levels of FCM-treated patients improved from 10.3 g/dL (interquartile range 9.5, 11.1 g/dL) at baseline to 11.8 g/dL (11.1, 13.0 g/dL) until the end of the 3-month observational period. Patients treated with FCM alone or additional ESA achieved similar median Hb increase (1.3 [0.4, 2.1] g/dL and 1.4 [0.4, 2.5] g/dL, respectively). Patients with baseline Hb up to 11.0 g/dL and serum ferritin up to 500 ng/mL and beyond achieved stable median Hb levels ≥11.0 g/dL without signs of iron overload. No severe or serious adverse reaction and no hypersensitivity reactions were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this observational study confirm the effectiveness and tolerability of FCM when given in clinical routine practice alone or in combination with an ESA.
PURPOSE: This study collected data on the use of ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) in a cancerpatient population in France to evaluate the feasibility and the conditions of use of FCM in routine clinical practice beyond the limiting criteria of clinical trials. METHODS: This observational, prospective study of patients with a solid tumour or a haematological malignancy who have received treatment with FCM after 01 July 2011 evaluated data about the circumstances of iron administration, concomitant medication and laboratory tests in the period from 3 months prior to the first FCM administration (baseline) until 3 months post-baseline. RESULTS: Data from 367 FCM-treated patients were analysed. FCM was mainly given as a single dose at baseline (69.2%) and without additional erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA, 64.3%). The median total iron dose was 1000 mg per patient. Median haemoglobin (Hb) levels of FCM-treated patients improved from 10.3 g/dL (interquartile range 9.5, 11.1 g/dL) at baseline to 11.8 g/dL (11.1, 13.0 g/dL) until the end of the 3-month observational period. Patients treated with FCM alone or additional ESA achieved similar median Hb increase (1.3 [0.4, 2.1] g/dL and 1.4 [0.4, 2.5] g/dL, respectively). Patients with baseline Hb up to 11.0 g/dL and serum ferritin up to 500 ng/mL and beyond achieved stable median Hb levels ≥11.0 g/dL without signs of iron overload. No severe or serious adverse reaction and no hypersensitivity reactions were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this observational study confirm the effectiveness and tolerability of FCM when given in clinical routine practice alone or in combination with an ESA.
Authors: Bernard Favrat; Katharina Balck; Christian Breymann; Michael Hedenus; Thomas Keller; Anna Mezzacasa; Christoph Gasche Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-04-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Heinz Ludwig; M Aapro; C Bokemeyer; J Glaspy; M Hedenus; T J Littlewood; A Österborg; B Rzychon; D Mitchell; Y Beguin Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: J Coussirou; A Debourdeau; A Stancu; C Jean; W Azouza; B Chanet; F De Crozals; R Boustany; P Debourdeau Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: J Bordini; S Galvan; M Ponzoni; M T S Bertilaccio; M Chesi; P L Bergsagel; C Camaschella; A Campanella Journal: Leukemia Date: 2016-11-24 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Elisabeth Luporsi; Alain Toledano; Dominique Spaeth; Florian Scotté; Marc Espié; Stéphanie Perot; Ladan Duvillié; Isabelle Pithois Merli; Roland Bugat Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-12-03 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Joana Lima; Patrícia Gago; Mariana Rocha; Inês Grilo; Rosa Gomes; Michael Luís; Teresa Sarmento; Antonio Teira; Marta Sousa; Miguel Barbosa Journal: Int J Gen Med Date: 2018-08-22
Authors: John A Glaspy; Michelle Z Lim-Watson; Michael A Libre; Swagata S Karkare; Nandini Hadker; Aleksandra Bajic-Lucas; William E Strauss; Naomi V Dahl Journal: Ther Clin Risk Manag Date: 2020-04-08 Impact factor: 2.423